/adversarial-review

Invoke the `multi:codex-review` subagent via the `Agent` tool, forwarding the user's request as the prompt and signaling ADVERSARIAL intent so the subagent routes to the companion's `adversarial-review` subcommand (not plain `review`). This runs Codex as a skeptical reviewer: it stress-tests the design decision, looks for the strongest counter-argument, and surfaces risks rather than rubber-stamping. Read-only — Codex never edits files. Use this when you want your approach challenged ("is this the right design?", "what am I missing?"), not just a line-by-line diff review. Raw user reques...

Invoke the multi:codex-review subagent via the Agent tool, forwarding the user's request as the prompt and signaling ADVERSARIAL intent so the subagent routes to the companion's adversarial-review subcommand (not plain review).

This runs Codex as a skeptical reviewer: it stress-tests the design decision, looks for the strongest counter-argument, and surfaces risks rather than rubber-stamping. Read-only — Codex never edits files.

Use this when you want your approach challenged ("is this the right design?", "what am I missing?"), not just a line-by-line diff review.

Raw user request: $ARGUMENTS

Execution:

Preserve --wait/--background/--base/--scope for the forwarded command.
Tell the subagent explicitly this is an ADVERSARIAL review so it selects the adversarial-review subcommand.

Return Codex's review output verbatim.

Use this when you want your approach challenged ("is this the right design?", "what am I missing?"), not just a line-by-line diff review.

Raw user request: $ARGUMENTS

Execution:

Preserve --wait/--background/--base/--scope for the forwarded command.
Tell the subagent explicitly this is an ADVERSARIAL review so it selects the adversarial-review subcommand.

Return Codex's review output verbatim.

Invocation

Tool Access

Context Preview

Command Content