Stats
Actions
Tags
'%20stop-opacity%3D'0.16'%2F%3E%3Cstop%20offset%3D'1'%20stop-color%3D'rgb(200%2C90%2C60)'%20stop-opacity%3D'0.03'%2F%3E%3C%2FlinearGradient%3E%3C%2Fdefs%3E%3Crect%20width%3D'320'%20height%3D'200'%20fill%3D'url(%23g)'%2F%3E%3Ccircle%20cx%3D'250'%20cy%3D'56'%20r%3D'92'%20fill%3D'rgb(200%2C90%2C60)'%20fill-opacity%3D'0.06'%2F%3E%3Ccircle%20cx%3D'64'%20cy%3D'172'%20r%3D'58'%20fill%3D'rgb(200%2C90%2C60)'%20fill-opacity%3D'0.05'%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E)
From discuss
Debates implementation approaches by presenting structured arguments for at least 3 options, then recommends one with clear reasoning.
How this command is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/discuss:discussThe summary Claude sees in its command listing — used to decide when to auto-load this command
Debate implementation approaches by presenting structured arguments for multiple options. ## Steps 1. Clearly state the decision to be made and any constraints. 2. Identify at least 3 viable approaches to the problem. 3. For each approach, analyze: 4. Compare approaches against key criteria: 5. Present a recommendation with clear reasoning. 6. Identify what would change the recommendation (e.g., "if scale exceeds X, use option B"). ## Format ## Rules - Present at least 3 options; "do nothing" can be one of them. - Be honest about trade-offs; no option is perfect. - The recommendat...
Debate implementation approaches by presenting structured arguments for multiple options.
Decision: <what needs to be decided>
Options:
A. <approach> - Pros: [...] Cons: [...] Effort: <X>
B. <approach> - Pros: [...] Cons: [...] Effort: <X>
npx claudepluginhub avelikiy/awesome-claude-code-toolkit --plugin discuss/discussDebates implementation approaches by presenting structured arguments for at least 3 options, then recommends one with clear reasoning.
/brainstormFacilitates structured brainstorming sessions with multiple AI perspectives. Explores options, tradeoffs, and risks without generating code.
/discussFacilitates technical discussions and decision-making by guiding structured analysis, trade-off evaluation, and consensus building, producing documented decision rationale.
/ultrathinkExecutes a structured, step-by-step thinking process for complex tasks and decisions. Breaks down problems, analyzes from multiple perspectives, and produces evidence-based proposals.
/optionsEvaluates architectural approaches by researching existing patterns, proposing 2-3 viable options, and getting user approval through sequential questioning.
/ultrathinkExecutes a structured, step-by-step thinking process for complex problems or important decisions, yielding a reasoned analysis and conclusion.