Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From legal
Triages an incoming NDA against screening criteria and classifies for routing: standard approval, counsel review, or full legal review.
npx claudepluginhub 8gg-git/claude --plugin legalHow this command is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/legal:triage-nda <NDA file or text>The summary Claude sees in its command listing — used to decide when to auto-load this command
# /triage-nda -- NDA Pre-Screening > If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](../CONNECTORS.md). Rapidly triage incoming NDAs against standard screening criteria. Classify the NDA for routing: standard approval, counsel review, or full legal review. ## Invocation ## Workflow ### Step 1: Accept the NDA Accept the NDA in any format: - **File upload**: PDF, DOCX, or other document format - **URL**: Link to the NDA in a document system - **Pasted text**: NDA text pasted directly If no NDA is provided, prompt the user to supply o...
/triage-ndaTriages an incoming NDA against screening criteria and classifies for routing: standard approval, counsel review, or full legal review.
/draft-ndaDrafts a customized Non-Disclosure Agreement for specified parties and context, with jurisdiction clauses, review flags, and plain-language summary.
/contract-summaryGenerates a structured contract review summary highlighting key terms, obligations, risks, and unusual provisions for attorney review.
/discovery-holdTriage documents for privilege review, relevance mapping, and litigation-hold scope. Produces a draft privilege-log table, spoliation-risk flags, and next-step recommendations.
/legal-draftDrafts common legal documents including contracts, demand letters, discovery responses, motions, and legal memoranda based on user-provided case details.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Rapidly triage incoming NDAs against standard screening criteria. Classify the NDA for routing: standard approval, counsel review, or full legal review.
/triage-nda
Accept the NDA in any format:
If no NDA is provided, prompt the user to supply one.
Look for NDA screening criteria in local settings (e.g., legal.local.md).
The NDA playbook should define:
If no NDA playbook is configured:
Evaluate the NDA against each screening criterion:
| Criterion | Check |
|---|---|
| Mutual vs. Unilateral | Are obligations mutual? If unilateral, is that appropriate for the relationship? |
| Definition of Confidential Information | Reasonable scope? Not overbroad (e.g., "all information of any kind")? |
| Term | Within acceptable range? Reasonable for the type of information? |
| Standard Carveouts | All required carveouts present? (independent development, public knowledge, third-party receipt, legal compulsion) |
| Permitted Disclosures | Can share with employees, advisors, contractors who need to know? |
| Return/Destruction | Reasonable obligations on termination? Allows retention of legal/compliance copies? |
| Residuals | If present, narrowly scoped to unaided memory? |
| Non-Solicitation | Any non-solicit provisions embedded? |
| Non-Compete | Any non-compete provisions embedded? |
| Injunctive Relief | Reasonable or one-sided? Pre-determined damages? |
| Governing Law | Acceptable jurisdiction? |
| Assignment | Reasonable assignment provisions? |
| Unusual Provisions | Any non-standard clauses that don't belong in an NDA? |
Based on the screening results, assign a classification:
All criteria met. NDA is market-standard with no unusual provisions.
One or more criteria have minor deviations that need review but are potentially acceptable:
One or more criteria have material deviations that pose risk:
Output a structured report:
## NDA Triage Report
**Classification**: [GREEN / YELLOW / RED]
**Parties**: [party names]
**Type**: [Mutual / Unilateral (disclosing) / Unilateral (receiving)]
**Term**: [duration]
**Governing Law**: [jurisdiction]
**Review Basis**: [Playbook / Default Standards]
## Screening Results
| Criterion | Status | Notes |
|-----------|--------|-------|
| Mutual Obligations | [PASS/FLAG/FAIL] | [details] |
| Definition Scope | [PASS/FLAG/FAIL] | [details] |
| Term | [PASS/FLAG/FAIL] | [details] |
| Standard Carveouts | [PASS/FLAG/FAIL] | [details] |
| [etc.] | | |
## Issues Found
### [Issue 1 -- YELLOW/RED]
**What**: [description]
**Risk**: [what could go wrong]
**Suggested Fix**: [specific language or approach]
[Repeat for each issue]
## Recommendation
[Specific next step: approve, send for review with specific notes, or reject/counter]
## Next Steps
1. [Action item 1]
2. [Action item 2]
Based on the classification: