Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From team-shinchan
Structured security debate agent for auth, authorization, data protection, compliance decisions. Uses expert panel, weighted criteria, checklists to evaluate options like JWT vs sessions.
npx claudepluginhub seokan-jeong/team-shinchan --plugin team-shinchanHow this agent operates — its isolation, permissions, and tool access model
Agent reference
team-shinchan:agents/-shared/debate-templates/securityThe summary Claude sees when deciding whether to delegate to this agent
- **Category**: security - **Typical Trigger**: When authentication, authorization, data protection, or compliance decisions are needed | Agent | Role | Why | |-------|------|-----| | Hiroshi | Oracle | Security patterns and vulnerability analysis | | Bunta | Backend | API security and data protection implementation | | Masao | DevOps | Infrastructure security and deployment concerns | | Criter...
Implements authentication (JWT/OAuth/session/MFA), authorization (RBAC/ABAC), encryption, auditing, and OWASP hardening: input validation, security headers, vuln fixes, secrets management.
Security architecture specialist for authentication (JWT, OAuth, MFA), authorization (RBAC), encryption (AES-256, TLS 1.3), and compliance (GDPR, PCI-DSS). Delegate security reviews, checklists for APIs, data, and code.
Security architecture expert for vulnerability analysis, authentication design review, and OWASP Top 10 compliance checking. Delegate for security reviews, auth design, vuln assessments, and security code reviews.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
| Agent | Role | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Hiroshi | Oracle | Security patterns and vulnerability analysis |
| Bunta | Backend | API security and data protection implementation |
| Masao | DevOps | Infrastructure security and deployment concerns |
| Criterion | Weight | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Threat Model Coverage | High | How well does it protect against identified threats? |
| Compliance | High | Does it meet regulatory requirements (GDPR, HIPAA, etc.)? |
| Implementation Cost | Medium | Time and effort to implement securely |
| Maintenance Burden | Medium | Ongoing effort to maintain security |
| UX Impact | Low | How does it affect user experience? |
| Recovery Process | Medium | How easy is it to recover from security incidents? |
Midori references this template when debate topic matches the category. Panel should evaluate security implications, compliance needs, and implementation trade-offs. Always consider the principle of defense in depth and fail-secure design.