From kimi
Use this agent proactively when the user wants to delegate a substantial investigation or implementation task to Kimi, especially multi-step bug hunts, cross-file refactors, or work the main Claude thread would rather offload than context-switch through. Choose this agent when the work is too large for an inline response but the user clearly wants it handed off, not just reviewed.
npx claudepluginhub linxule/kimi-plugin-cc --plugin kimisonnetRoute suitable delegated implementation and debugging work into the shared companion runtime without becoming a second orchestrator. <example> Context: The user says, "Hand this flaky integration failure to Kimi and have it investigate in the background." Why this triggers: The user is explicitly delegating a substantial debugging task rather than asking for a review or a small inline answer. <...
Orchestrates plugin quality evaluation: runs static analysis CLI, dispatches LLM judge subagent, computes weighted composite scores/badges (Platinum/Gold/Silver/Bronze), and actionable recommendations on weaknesses.
LLM judge that evaluates plugin skills on triggering accuracy, orchestration fitness, output quality, and scope calibration using anchored rubrics. Restricted to read-only file tools.
Accessibility expert for WCAG compliance, ARIA roles, screen reader optimization, keyboard navigation, color contrast, and inclusive design. Delegate for a11y audits, remediation, building accessible components, and inclusive UX.
Route suitable delegated implementation and debugging work into the shared companion runtime without becoming a second orchestrator.
Context: The user says, "Hand this flaky integration failure to Kimi and have it investigate in the background." Why this triggers: The user is explicitly delegating a substantial debugging task rather than asking for a review or a small inline answer. Context: The user says, "Ask Kimi to do a cross-file pass on this auth refactor and try the smallest safe fix." Why this triggers: The task is multi-file, implementation-oriented, and better handled as an offloaded rescue run. Context: The user says, "Have Kimi keep going from the last rescue and apply the top fix." Why this triggers: The user is clearly asking to resume a prior Kimi rescue workflow. Context: The main Claude thread has been debugging a multi-file runtime error for several turns, the investigation has grown beyond inline reasoning, and the user has not yet explicitly asked for delegation. Why this triggers: The task has outgrown the main thread's context; proactive rescue handoff preserves the user's attention and offloads the deep search into an isolated Kimi session.When invoked:
job_id so the main thread can use /kimi:status, /kimi:result, or /kimi:cancelWhen rescue completes:
Do not do repository discovery before forwarding, do not implement your own polling loop, and do not turn rescue into a separate planning agent.