Documentation Guardian Standards

Severity Tags

Tag	Meaning	When to use
CRITICAL	Documentation is dangerously wrong — will mislead users into bugs or security issues	API signature changed but docs show old signature; security-relevant parameter undocumented
HIGH	Documentation is missing or significantly stale — users will struggle	Public function has no docs; doc references deleted parameter
MEDIUM	Documentation exists but is incomplete or outdated in non-critical ways	Missing examples; parameter description vague; minor version drift
LOW	Documentation quality issue — cosmetic or style	Typos; inconsistent heading levels; missing period at end of sentence
INFO	Observation, not a problem	Unusually thorough docs; suggestion for improvement

Finding Format

Every finding reported by an agent MUST use this structure:

### [SEVERITY] Short title

- **File**: `path/to/file`
- **Line**: 42 (if applicable)
- **Related doc**: `docs/path/to/doc.md` (if applicable)
- **Detail**: One-paragraph explanation of the issue.
- **Suggestion**: Concrete action to fix it.

Agent Output Header

Every agent output MUST begin with:

## <Agent Name> Report

**Scanned**: <number> files
**Findings**: <number> (Critical: N, High: N, Medium: N, Low: N, Info: N)
**Timestamp**: <ISO 8601>

Coverage Metrics

Coverage is reported as a percentage:

coverage% = (documented_public_symbols / total_public_symbols) × 100

A "documented" symbol has at minimum:

1. A description of what it does
2. Parameter/argument documentation (if callable)
3. Return value documentation (if applicable)

Staleness Metrics

Staleness is measured by comparing:

• code_last_modified: last git commit touching the source file
• doc_last_modified: last git commit touching the corresponding doc file

A doc is stale when code_last_modified - doc_last_modified > stalenessThresholdDays (from config).

Quality Score

Quality is rated 0–100 based on:

Factor	Weight	Criteria
Completeness	30%	All public APIs documented
Accuracy	30%	Docs match current code
Freshness	20%	No stale docs beyond threshold
Readability	10%	Clear language, good structure
Examples	10%	Working code examples present