Preamble

Environment Detection

mkdir -p ~/.omni-skills/sessions
_PROACTIVE=$(~/.claude/skills/superomni/bin/config get proactive 2>/dev/null || echo "true")
_BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
_TEL_START=$(date +%s)
echo "Branch: $_BRANCH | PROACTIVE: $_PROACTIVE"

PROACTIVE Mode

If PROACTIVE is false: do NOT proactively suggest skills. Only run skills the user explicitly invokes. If you would have auto-invoked, say: "I think [skill-name] might help here — want me to run it?" and wait.

Completion Status Protocol

Report status using one of these at the end of every skill session:

• DONE — All steps completed. Evidence provided.
• DONE_WITH_CONCERNS — Completed with issues. List each concern explicitly.
• BLOCKED — Cannot proceed. State what blocks you and what was tried.
• NEEDS_CONTEXT — Missing information. State exactly what you need.

Auto-Advance Rule

Pipeline stage order: THINK → PLAN → REVIEW → BUILD → VERIFY → SHIP → REFLECT

REVIEW is the only human gate. All other stages auto-advance on DONE.

Status	At REVIEW stage	At all other stages
DONE	STOP — present review summary, wait for user input (Y / N / revision notes)	Auto-advance — print [STAGE] DONE → advancing to [NEXT-STAGE] and immediately invoke next skill
DONE_WITH_CONCERNS	STOP — present concerns, wait for user decision	STOP — present concerns, wait for user decision
BLOCKED / NEEDS_CONTEXT	STOP — present blocker, wait for user	STOP — present blocker, wait for user

When auto-advancing:

1. Write the session artifact to docs/superomni/
2. Print: [STAGE] DONE → advancing to [NEXT-STAGE] ([skill-name])
3. Immediately invoke the next pipeline skill

Session Continuity

When the user sends a follow-up message after a completed session, before doing anything else:

1. Scan for prior session context:

   ls docs/superomni/specs/spec-*.md docs/superomni/plans/plan-*.md docs/superomni/ .superomni/ 2>/dev/null | head -20
   git log --oneline -3 2>/dev/null
   

   To find the latest spec or plan:

   _LATEST_SPEC=$(ls docs/superomni/specs/spec-*.md 2>/dev/null | sort | tail -1)
   _LATEST_PLAN=$(ls docs/superomni/plans/plan-*.md 2>/dev/null | sort | tail -1)
   

2. If context exists → re-engage the skill framework. Pick the skill that matches the current stage (see workflow skill for stage → skill mapping) and announce: "Continuing in superomni mode — picking up at [stage] using [skill-name]."
3. If no context → treat as a fresh session and offer the relevant skill from the Quick Reference table in using-skills/SKILL.md.

Question Confirmation Protocol

When asking the user a question, match the confirmation requirement to the complexity of the response:

Question type	Confirmation rule
Single-choice — user picks one option (A/B/C, 1/2/3, Yes/No)	The user's selection IS the confirmation. Do NOT ask "Are you sure?" or require a second submission.
Free-text input — user types a value and presses Enter	The submitted text IS the confirmation. No secondary prompt needed.
Multi-choice — user selects multiple items from a list	After the user lists their selections, ask once: "Confirm these selections? (Y to proceed)" before acting.
Complex / open-ended discussion — back-and-forth clarification	Collect all input, then present a summary and ask: "Ready to proceed with the above? (Y/N)" before acting.

Rule: never add a redundant confirmation layer on top of a single-choice or text-input answer.

Custom Input Option Rule: Whenever you present a predefined list of choices (A/B/C, numbered options, etc.), always append a final "Other" option that lets the user describe their own idea:

  [last letter/number + 1]) Other — describe your own idea: ___________

When the user selects "Other" and provides their custom text, treat that text as the chosen option and proceed exactly as you would for any other selection. If the custom text is ambiguous, ask one clarifying question before proceeding.

Context Window Management

Load context progressively — only what is needed for the current phase:

Phase	Load these	Defer these
Planning	Latest docs/superomni/specs/spec-*.md, constraints, prior decisions	Full codebase, test files
Implementation	Latest docs/superomni/plans/plan-*.md, relevant source files	Unrelated modules, docs
Review/Debug	diff, failing test output, minimal repro	Full history, specs

If context pressure is high: summarize prior phases into 3-5 bullet points, then discard raw content.

Output Directory

All skill artifacts are written to docs/superomni/ (relative to project root). See the Document Output Convention in CLAUDE.md for the full directory map.

Feedback Signal Protocol

Agent failures are harness signals — not reasons to retry the same approach:

• 1 failure → retry with a different approach
• 2 failures → surface to user: "Tried [A] and [B], both failed. Recommend [C]."
• 3 consecutive failures → STOP. Report BLOCKED. Treat as a harness deficiency signal. Recommended: invoke harness-engineering skill to update the harness before retrying.
• Uncertain about security → STOP and report NEEDS_CONTEXT
• Scope exceeds verification capacity → STOP and flag blast radius

It is always OK to stop and say "this is too hard for me." Escalation is expected, not penalized.

Performance Checkpoint

After completing any skill session, run a 3-question self-check before writing the final status:

1. Process — Did I follow all defined phases? If any were skipped, state why.
2. Evidence — Is every claim backed by a test result, command output, or file reference? If not, gather the missing evidence now.
3. Scope — Did I stay within the task boundary? If I touched files outside the original scope, flag them explicitly.

If any answer is NO, address it before reporting DONE. If it cannot be addressed, report DONE_WITH_CONCERNS and name the gap.

For a full performance evaluation spanning the entire sprint, use the self-improvement skill.

Telemetry (Local Only)

_TEL_END=$(date +%s)
_TEL_DUR=$(( _TEL_END - _TEL_START ))
~/.claude/skills/superomni/bin/analytics-log "SKILL_NAME" "$_TEL_DUR" "OUTCOME" 2>/dev/null || true

Nothing is sent to external servers. Data is stored only in ~/.omni-skills/analytics/.

Brainstorming & Specification

Goal: Transform a fuzzy idea into a concrete, reviewable spec document.

Iron Law: Search Before Building

Before designing anything:

1. Layer 1 — Tried and true: Does a well-established solution already exist?
2. Layer 2 — New and popular: Is there a recently popular approach? Evaluate carefully.
3. Layer 3 — First principles: Only design from scratch if nothing fits.

Run: grep -r "similar functionality" . --include="*.md" -l to check existing docs.

Phase 1: Problem Crystallization

Ask ONE clarifying question at a time. Do not ask multiple questions at once.

Required understanding before proceeding:

• What is the problem being solved? (not the solution)
• Who experiences this problem?
• What does success look like? (measurable outcome)
• What constraints exist? (time, technology, team size)
• What already exists that's related?

Rule: Ask one question. Wait for answer. Then ask the next. Confirmation rule: each answer (text input or single-choice) is an immediate confirmation — do NOT re-ask or add a "confirm?" prompt after the user replies.

Phase 2: Solution Space Exploration

Generate 3 candidate approaches, then always offer an "Other" option for the user's own idea:

Option A: [name] — [1-sentence description]
  Pro: ...
  Con: ...
  Effort: [S/M/L]

Option B: [name] — [1-sentence description]
  Pro: ...
  Con: ...
  Effort: [S/M/L]

Option C: [name] — [1-sentence description]
  Pro: ...
  Con: ...
  Effort: [S/M/L]

Option D (Other): describe your own approach — ___________

Apply the 6 Decision Principles when evaluating:

• Prefer completeness (covers more cases)
• Prefer DRY (reuses existing)
• Prefer explicit over clever

Surface only TASTE decisions to the user. Decide MECHANICAL ones silently.

Phase 3: Visual Companion (if applicable)

For UI or architecture work, produce a text diagram or ASCII wireframe. See visual-companion.md for diagram formats.

Frontend Design Integration: If the spec involves UI components, pages, or visual design:

• Note in the spec: "This involves UI work — recommend running the frontend-design skill during BUILD to ensure design quality."
• When generating acceptance criteria, include: "Passes designer agent review at 7+/10 on all dimensions"

Phase 4: Spec Document Output

mkdir -p docs/superomni/specs
_BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null | tr '/' '-' || echo "unknown")
_SESSION="<auto-generate-kebab-case-from-context>"  # e.g., auth-refactor, vibe-skill
_DATE=$(date +%Y%m%d)
_SPEC_FILE="docs/superomni/specs/spec-${_BRANCH}-${_SESSION}-${_DATE}.md"

Produce docs/superomni/specs/spec-[branch]-[session]-[date].md with this structure:

# [Feature Name] — Spec

## Problem
[1 paragraph: what is broken or missing and for whom]

## Goals
- [Measurable outcome 1]
- [Measurable outcome 2]

## Non-Goals (YAGNI)
- [What we are explicitly NOT building]

## Proposed Solution
[Selected approach + rationale]

## Key Design Decisions
| Decision | Choice | Rationale | Principle Applied |

## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] [Testable criterion 1]
- [ ] [Testable criterion 2]

## Open Questions
- [Any unresolved taste decisions requiring user input]

Phase 5: Spec Review

Pass the spec to spec-document-reviewer-prompt.md for structured review.

Report status: DONE — spec written and reviewed. Path: [spec file path]