npx claudepluginhub waterplanai/agentic-config --plugin ac-qaThis skill is limited to using the following tools:
Review the GitHub pull request with comprehensive validation using multi-agent orchestration.
Reviews GitHub pull requests end-to-end using gh CLI: analyzes diffs, commits, CI/CD checks; provides blocking/suggestion/nit/praise feedback and submits review. Use for assigned PRs, self-reviews, or post-merge audits.
Reviews GitHub PRs: fetches diff via gh CLI, runs repo-specific checks, launches 3 parallel agents for correctness/conventions/efficiency, validates findings, drafts review.
Reviews pull requests autonomously with parallel multi-agent analysis for security, performance, testing, architecture, and style on changed files.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Review the GitHub pull request with comprehensive validation using multi-agent orchestration.
https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123)tmp/mux/{date}-{uuid}/PR-{PR_NUMBER}-{UUID}.md)$1tmp/mux/{date}-{uuid}/Use gh CLI to gather PR information:
gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json title,body,author,state,baseRefName,headRefName,files,additions,deletions,commits
gh pr diff <PR_NUMBER>
gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json comments,reviews
gh pr checks <PR_NUMBER>
Store PR metadata for agent context.
Use the Task tool to spawn 5 agents in parallel. Each agent writes findings to its output file.
Subagent type: general-purpose
Task: Compare PR diff against expected changes: $2
{OUTPUT_DIR}/01_expected_changes.mdSubagent type: general-purpose
Task: Security review of PR diff
{OUTPUT_DIR}/02_security.mdSubagent type: general-purpose
Task: Code quality review of PR diff
{OUTPUT_DIR}/03_code_quality.mdSubagent type: general-purpose
Task: Discover and run tests from PR
{OUTPUT_DIR}/04_tests.mdSubagent type: general-purpose
Model: opus (requires deep reasoning)
Task: Critical evaluation of logic changes and bug introduction risk
For each issue found:
[SEVERITY] - [Category]
Location: file:line
Issue: [description]
Why it's a bug: [reasoning]
Fix suggestion: [if applicable]
{OUTPUT_DIR}/05_logic_bugs.mdAfter ALL agents complete:
{OUTPUT_DIR}/*.mdCreate report at: $3 or tmp/mux/{date}-{uuid}/PR-{PR_NUMBER}-{UUID}.md
# PR Review: #{PR_NUMBER}
**URL**: {PR_URL}
**Title**: {PR_TITLE}
**Author**: {AUTHOR}
**Branch**: {HEAD} -> {BASE}
**Review Session**: {UUID}
**Date**: {TIMESTAMP}
---
## Executive Summary
{Overall assessment: APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES / NEEDS_DISCUSSION}
### Scores
| Category | Score | Status |
|----------|-------|--------|
| Expected Changes Alignment | X/10 | {emoji} |
| Logic & Bug Risk | X/10 | {emoji} |
| Security | X/10 | {emoji} |
| Code Quality | X/10 | {emoji} |
| Tests | X/10 | {emoji} |
---
## Detailed Findings
### Expected Changes
{From Agent 1}
### Logic & Bug Risk (CRITICAL)
{From Agent 5 - This section requires careful review}
#### Logic Issues Found
{List of logic correctness problems}
#### Potential Bugs Introduced
{List of bug risks with severity and reasoning}
#### Impact Assessment
{Downstream effects and contract changes}
### Security
{From Agent 2}
### Code Quality
{From Agent 3}
### Test Results
{From Agent 4}
---
## PR Review Comments
| File | Line | Severity | Comment |
|------|------|----------|---------|
| path/file.py | 42 | ERROR | Issue description |
---
## PR Review Message
{Copy-paste ready message for GitHub PR comment}
### Recommendation
- APPROVE: Ready to merge
- REQUEST_CHANGES: Must address before merge
- COMMENT: No blocking issues
---
## Next Steps
{Actionable recommendations}
Output summary to user:
PR REVIEW COMPLETE
PR: #{PR_NUMBER} - {TITLE}
Report: {REPORT_PATH}
Top Issues:
{Critical findings}
Proposed Actions:
1. Post review: gh pr review {PR_NUMBER} --comment --body-file {REPORT}
2. Request changes: gh pr review {PR_NUMBER} --request-changes
3. Approve: gh pr review {PR_NUMBER} --approve
Which action?