From xiaohongshu-complete-skills
Guides data-driven product selection for Xiaohongshu e-commerce, evaluating demand, competition, profitability, suppliers for live streams, content, and inventory.
npx claudepluginhub vivy-yi/xiaohongshu-skills --plugin xiaohongshu-complete-skillsThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Product selection is the data-driven process of identifying and choosing profitable, marketable products that align with your audience's needs, have sufficient demand, and offer viable profit margins for Xiaohongshu e-commerce success.
Guides Next.js Cache Components and Partial Prerendering (PPR) with cacheComponents enabled. Implements 'use cache', cacheLife(), cacheTag(), revalidateTag(), static/dynamic optimization, and cache debugging.
Guides building MCP servers enabling LLMs to interact with external services via tools. Covers best practices, TypeScript/Node (MCP SDK), Python (FastMCP).
Generates original PNG/PDF visual art via design philosophy manifestos for posters, graphics, and static designs on user request.
Product selection is the data-driven process of identifying and choosing profitable, marketable products that align with your audience's needs, have sufficient demand, and offer viable profit margins for Xiaohongshu e-commerce success.
Use when:
Do NOT use when:
Before (guessing what will sell):
❌ "This product looks cool, I think my audience will like it"
❌ "Everyone's selling this, I should too"
❌ "Low price means high sales, right?"
❌ "I'll just copy competitors' products"
After (data-driven selection):
✅ "Search volume for 'skincare for oily skin' up 300%, low competition"
✅ "Product cost ¥15, market price ¥59-89, 50-80% margin viable"
✅ "Supplier has 95% positive rating, can ship within 48h"
✅ "My audience (women 22-28) matches this product's target demographic perfectly"
✅ "10 competitors selling this, but only 2 focus on budget-friendly positioning"
4 Product Selection Framework:
| Selection Factor | What to Check | Good Benchmark | Analysis Tools |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demand | Search volume, trends | 1000+ searches/month | Xiaohongshu search, Qiangua |
| Competition | Number of sellers | <20 direct competitors | Manual search, Qiangua |
| Price Spread | Cost vs market price | 3-5x markup potential | 1688, market research |
| Margin | Profit after all costs | >40% gross margin | Excel calculator |
| Supplier Rating | Reliability score | >95% positive | 1688 reviews, sample orders |
Before researching products, establish your selection criteria:
Audience Alignment:
Primary audience: Women 22-28, urban professionals
Price sensitivity: Mid-range (¥50-200 acceptable)
Quality expectations: Premium, not cheapest option
Pain points: Time-poor, stress-prone, seeking convenience
Business Goals:
Target margin: Minimum 50% gross margin
Price point: ¥50-200 per product
Order volume: Handle 10-50 orders/day initially
Inventory capacity: Can invest ¥5,000-10,000 in initial stock
Shipping: Must ship within 48 hours
Red Flags (automatically disqualify):
Xiaohongshu Search Analysis:
Search Volume Indicators:
High Demand Signals:
- Keyword appears in "热门搜索" (trending searches)
- 100+ new posts/day using keyword
- Top posts have 10,000+ views
- Multiple accounts successfully selling related products
Low Demand Signals:
- <10 new posts/day using keyword
- Top posts have <1,000 views
- No product tags or shopping links in posts
Qiangua Data Demand Analysis:
Trend Identification:
Rising Trends (prioritize):
- Search volume growing >50% month-over-month
- Sudden spike in social media mentions
- New product category gaining traction
- Seasonal demand approaching (e.g., summer skincare)
Declining Trends (avoid):
- Search volume falling >30% month-over-month
- Product category saturated with sellers
- Negative sentiment increasing in reviews
Count Direct Competitors:
Method 1: Xiaohongshu Search
- Search product name/keywords
- Filter by "商品" (products) tag
- Count unique accounts selling in last 30 days
- Note: <10 = low competition, 10-50 = moderate, >50 = saturated
Method 2: Manual Market Scan
- Search top 10 related hashtags
- Identify accounts with shopping links
- Categorize by size (micro, mid, macro influencers)
- Note their positioning and pricing
Competitive Advantage Analysis:
For each top 5 competitor, analyze:
1. Product positioning (luxury, budget, professional)
2. Price range (are they competing on price or quality?)
3. Content style (educational, inspirational, promotional)
4. Engagement rate (highly engaged = loyal audience)
5. Follower count (direct size comparison)
Identify Gaps:
- "All competitors focus on premium pricing → budget positioning opportunity"
- "No competitor creates video reviews → video content differentiation"
- "Competitors ignore specific use case → niche opportunity"
Market Saturation Assessment:
Green Light (Low Competition):
- <10 direct competitors
- Clear differentiation opportunity
- Growing demand, limited supply
- Example: "Skincare for oily skin" niche
Yellow Light (Moderate Competition):
- 10-50 direct competitors
- Some differentiation possible
- Stable demand, moderate supply
- Need clear unique value proposition
Red Light (High Saturation):
- >50 direct competitors
- Commoditized product, hard to differentiate
- Declining or stagnant demand
- Only enter with significant advantage (price, supply, audience)
Calculate Total Cost:
Product Cost Breakdown:
- Purchase cost from supplier: ¥15
- Shipping to warehouse: ¥2
- Packaging materials: ¥1
- Platform commission (5-10%): ¥5 (based on ¥89 selling price)
- Marketing cost (optional): ¥10 (content creation, ads)
- Returns allowance (5%): ¥4.45
Total Cost: ¥15 + ¥2 + ¥1 + ¥5 + ¥10 + ¥4.45 = ¥37.45
Calculate Margin:
Selling Price: ¥89
Total Cost: ¥37.45
Gross Profit: ¥89 - ¥37.45 = ¥51.55
Gross Margin: 51.55 ÷ 89 = 57.9%
Break-Even Analysis:
- Fixed costs (equipment, software): ¥2,000
- Variable cost per unit: ¥37.45
- Break-even quantity: 2,000 ÷ (89 - 37.45) = 39 units
Profitability Benchmarks:
Excellent: >60% gross margin
Good: 40-60% gross margin
Acceptable: 30-40% gross margin
Poor: <30% gross margin (avoid or negotiate better pricing)
Minimum Viable Margin: 40%
(Allows room for marketing, discounts, errors)
Price Positioning Strategy:
Budget Positioning:
- Sell at 2-3x cost
- Focus on value for money
- Target price-sensitive audience
- Higher volume, lower margin
Premium Positioning:
- Sell at 5-8x cost
- Focus on quality, exclusivity
- Target affluent audience
- Lower volume, higher margin
Mid-Range Positioning (recommended for most):
- Sell at 3-5x cost
- Balance quality and affordability
- Target mass market
- Moderate volume, moderate margin
Source Suppliers:
Primary Channels:
1. 1688.com (Alibaba wholesale)
- Largest supplier base
- Price competitive
- Verify supplier rating carefully
2. Pinduoduo (for retail testing)
- Buy small quantities for testing
- Higher cost, low risk
- Validate product before bulk ordering
3. Brand Direct Partnerships
- Contact brands for distributor pricing
- Exclusive products possible
- Requires established audience
4. Local Wholesale Markets
- Physical inspection possible
- Build relationship face-to-face
- Limited to local inventory
Supplier Vetting Checklist:
Must-Have Criteria:
✅ Supplier rating >95% positive
✅ Response time <12 hours
✅ Ships within 48 hours of order
✅ Accepts sample orders
✅ Clear product photos and descriptions
✅ Minimum order quantity (MOQ) manageable for you
Nice-to-Have Criteria:
⭐ Offers branded packaging
⭐ Provides marketing materials
⭐ Has dropshipping option
⭐ Offers exclusive pricing tiers
⭐ Responsive to custom requests
Sample Order Testing:
Before committing to bulk:
1. Order sample (1-5 units)
2. Test product quality personally
3. Check packaging and presentation
4. Verify shipping speed
5. Test product for content creation (photography, video)
6. Calculate actual costs vs quoted
Sample Evaluation:
- Quality meets expectations? ✓
- Packaging photo-ready? ✓
- Can create good content with it? ✓
- Shipping as promised? ✓
- All costs accurate? ✓
If any ✗, negotiate improvements or find alternative supplier.
Create scoring matrix for top 5-10 product candidates:
Product A: Budget Skincare Set
├─ Market Demand: 8/10 (high search volume, trending)
├─ Competition: 6/10 (moderate, but differentiation possible)
├─ Profitability: 9/10 (65% margin, good price point)
├─ Supply Chain: 7/10 (reliable supplier, 48h shipping)
└─ Audience Fit: 9/10 (perfect match for 25-30 professional women)
TOTAL: 39/40 → ⭐⭐⭐ TOP CHOICE
Product B: Premium Beauty Device
├─ Market Demand: 7/10 (steady demand)
├─ Competition: 4/10 (high competition, hard to differentiate)
├─ Profitability: 10/10 (80% margin)
├─ Supply Chain: 5/10 (supplier reliability concerns)
└─ Audience Fit: 6/10 (expensive for some followers)
TOTAL: 32/40 → ⭐⭐ SECOND CHOICE
[Continue for all candidates...]
Selection Decision:
Tier 1 (Immediate Selection): 38-40 points
- Launch immediately, prioritize in content
Tier 2 (Test First): 34-37 points
- Order samples, create test content
- Monitor performance before full commitment
Tier 3 (Monitor): <34 points
- Keep on radar, reassess quarterly
- Don't invest inventory or marketing yet
Initial Order Strategy:
First Order (Test Phase):
- Order 10-20 units per top product
- Enough to test content and initial sales
- Low risk if product doesn't sell
Second Order (Scale Phase):
- Reorder 50-100 units of proven sellers
- Negotiate better pricing with volume
- Invest in professional content creation
Third Order (Optimize Phase):
- 100+ units per month
- Bulk pricing, improved margins
- Expand content and marketing
Content Launch Plan:
Week 1: Educational Content
- 3 posts explaining product benefits
- Focus on pain points and solutions
- No direct selling, just value
Week 2: Social Proof
- Share personal experience with product
- Before/after results if applicable
- Build trust through authenticity
Week 3: Sales Push
- Product review with purchase link
- Limited-time discount for urgency
- Clear call-to-action
Week 4: Retargeting
- Address common questions/objections
- Share customer testimonials if available
- Remind about discount ending
| Mistake | Why Happens | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Choosing products based on personal preference | Easy, feels right | Always validate with market demand data first |
| Ignoring competition analysis | Want to believe product is unique | Research competitors before investing inventory |
| Focusing only on low cost | Assumes cheap = high sales | Balance cost with quality and margin |
| Forgetting about platform commissions | Eats into margin | Calculate total costs including 5-10% platform fee |
| Not testing samples before bulk ordering | Want to launch quickly | Always order samples, test quality and content fit |
| Over-estimating demand | Optimism bias | Use objective data (search volume, trends) not gut feel |
| Under-estimating competition | Didn't research thoroughly | Manual search + Qiangua for complete picture |
| Ignoring audience fit | Chasing trends | Product must solve audience's specific problems |
| Not having clear red flags | Want to consider everything | Define disqualifying criteria upfront, stick to them |
| One-product reliance | Found winner, stopped looking | Diversify product mix, reduce risk |
| Not tracking product performance | Busy with operations | Monitor each product's sales, margin, return rate |
| Choosing products too broad | Want mass appeal | Niche products often outperform general ones |
Case Study: Skincare Product Selection
Data-Backed Insights:
REQUIRED: Use account-positioning (ensure products align with account positioning) REQUIRED: Use user-persona-analysis (select products audience actually wants)
Recommended for deeper analysis:
Use product-selection BEFORE:
Related e-commerce skills: