From xiaohongshu-complete-skills
Provides analytics patterns for Ju Mama on Xiaohongshu/Douyin: track live stream sales, product trends, shop performance, competitors, and influencers.
npx claudepluginhub vivy-yi/xiaohongshu-skills --plugin xiaohongshu-complete-skillsThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Ju Mama (蝉妈妈) is a comprehensive e-commerce analytics platform for Xiaohongshu and Douyin, providing live stream monitoring, product trend analysis, shop performance tracking, influencer commerce data, and competitive intelligence to help brands and sellers optimize their social commerce strategies.
Guides Next.js Cache Components and Partial Prerendering (PPR) with cacheComponents enabled. Implements 'use cache', cacheLife(), cacheTag(), revalidateTag(), static/dynamic optimization, and cache debugging.
Guides building MCP servers enabling LLMs to interact with external services via tools. Covers best practices, TypeScript/Node (MCP SDK), Python (FastMCP).
Generates original PNG/PDF visual art via design philosophy manifestos for posters, graphics, and static designs on user request.
Ju Mama (蝉妈妈) is a comprehensive e-commerce analytics platform for Xiaohongshu and Douyin, providing live stream monitoring, product trend analysis, shop performance tracking, influencer commerce data, and competitive intelligence to help brands and sellers optimize their social commerce strategies.
Use when:
Do NOT use when:
Before (flying blind on e-commerce):
❌ "No idea which products sell best"
❌ "Guessing pricing strategies"
❌ "Blind to competitor moves"
❌ "Wasting ad spend on poor performers"
❌ "Stock outs or overstock situations"
After (data-driven commerce):
✅ "Know exactly what sells and why"
✅ "Optimal pricing based on market data"
✅ "Competitor strategies revealed"
✅ "Invest in high-ROI products only"
✅ "Inventory matches demand perfectly"
5 Core Analytics Areas:
| Analysis Type | Key Metrics | Update Frequency | Use For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Stream Sales | GMV, units sold, conversion | Real-time | Performance optimization |
| Product Trends | Search volume, sales rank | Daily | Product selection |
| Shop Analytics | Revenue, traffic, conversion | Daily | Business health |
| Competitor Data | Pricing, promotions, sales | Weekly | Strategy adjustment |
| Influencer Commerce | Sales per influencer, ROI | Per campaign | Partner selection |
Track Real-Time Commerce:
Live Stream Analytics Framework:
1. GMV and Sales Tracking
Measure Revenue Generation:
Key Metrics:
GMV (Gross Merchandise Value):
- Total sales value (before returns)
- Real-time tracking during stream
- Segment by product
- Compare to targets
Units Sold:
- Quantity of each product
- Inventory depletion rate
- Best-selling items
- Stock level alerts
Conversion Rate:
- Viewers to buyers
- Clicks to purchases
- Offer conversion
- Time-based conversion (peak times)
Example Live Stream Dashboard:
"Live Stream: March 15, 8-9 PM
Product: Hydrating Serum Launch
Real-Time Metrics:
- Peak viewers: 5,200
- Average watch time: 18 minutes
- GMV generated: ¥127,500
- Units sold: 847 units
- Avg order value: ¥150
- Conversion rate: 16.3%
Product Breakdown:
- Hydrating Serum: 650 units (¥97,500)
- Gentle Cleanser: 120 units (¥12,000)
- Night Cream: 77 units (¥18,000)
Peak Sales Time:
- 8:45-8:55 PM (offer announcement)
- Sold 350 units in 10 minutes
Insights:
- Offer timing drove 40% of sales
- Serum is hero product (77% of revenue)
- Cleanser and cream are add-ons
- Optimal offer time: 45 min into stream"
2. Engagement-to-Sales Funnel
Understand Conversion Path:
Funnel Stages:
Viewers → Product Clicks → Add to Cart → Purchase
Stage Metrics:
Viewers (Top of Funnel):
- Total unique viewers
- Peak concurrent
- Average duration
Product Clicks (Mid-Funnel):
- Product page views
- Click-through rate
- Product interest ranking
Add to Cart (Bottom-Funnel):
- Cart additions
- Cart abandonment rate
- Multiple product adds
Purchase (Conversion):
- Completed purchases
- Conversion rate
- Revenue per viewer
Funnel Analysis:
"Live Stream Funnel Analysis:
Stage 1 - Viewers: 5,200 (100%)
↓
Stage 2 - Product Clicks: 1,820 (35% click-through)
↓
Stage 3 - Add to Cart: 1,144 (63% cart rate from clicks)
↓
Stage 4 - Purchase: 847 (74% purchase rate from carts)
Drop-off Analysis:
- 65% don't click products (engagement issue)
- 37% abandon cart (objection or friction)
- 26% don't purchase (decision hesitation)
Optimization Opportunities:
- Improve product presentations (increase clicks)
- Address cart objections (reduce abandonment)
- Create urgency (increase purchase rate)
Next Stream Actions:
- More product demos (boost click-through)
- Limited stock warnings (reduce hesitation)
- Bundle offers (increase cart value)"
3. Offer Performance Analysis
Identify Winning Promotions:
Offer Types Tested:
Percentage Discount:
- 10% off (moderate)
- 20% off (strong)
- 30% off (aggressive)
Bundle Deals:
- Buy 2 get 1 free
- Complete kit (3 products)
- Starter kit (2 products)
Exclusive Offers:
- Live-only pricing
- Limited quantity
- Time-sensitive (next 10 minutes)
Performance Comparison:
"Offer Test Results:
Offer A: 15% off single product
- Units sold: 180
- Revenue: ¥22,950
- Avg discount: ¥22.50 per unit
- Margin: 65%
Offer B: Buy 2 get 1 free (bundle)
- Units sold: 450 (150 bundles)
- Revenue: ¥45,000
- Avg discount: ¥30 per bundle
- Margin: 55%
- Inventory movement: 3x faster
Offer C: Live-only 20% off + free shipping
- Units sold: 280
- Revenue: ¥33,600
- Avg discount: ¥40 per unit
- Margin: 50%
- Urgency: High (live-only)
Winner: Offer B (Buy 2 Get 1)
- Highest revenue (¥45,000)
- Best inventory efficiency
- Good margin maintained
- Customer perceived value: High
Learning: Bundles outperform single discounts"
4. Host Performance Evaluation
Measure Presenter Effectiveness:
Host Metrics:
Sales Conversion:
- Revenue per host
- Units sold per host
- Conversion rate by host
- Audience engagement
Presentation Skills:
- Product knowledge
- Energy and enthusiasm
- Audience interaction
- Objection handling
Comparison:
"Host Performance Comparison:
Host A (Brand Founder):
- Streams: 4x/week
- Avg GMV: ¥85,000/stream
- Conversion rate: 14.2%
- Strength: Product expertise, authentic
- Weakness: Less polished presentation
Host B (Professional Streamer):
- Streams: 5x/week
- Avg GMV: ¥92,000/stream
- Conversion rate: 16.8%
- Strength: Polished, great sales skills
- Weakness: Less product depth
Host C (Customer Tester):
- Streams: 2x/week
- Avg GMV: ¥65,000/stream
- Conversion rate: 12.5%
- Strength: Authenticity, relatable
- Weakness: Limited availability
Optimal Mix:
- Host B for major launches (sales skill)
- Host A for educational content (expertise)
- Host C for testimonials (authenticity)
- Combined: ¥242,000/week (all three)"
5. Time-of-Stream Optimization
Identify Peak Selling Moments:
Stream Timeline Analysis:
- First 15 minutes (warm-up)
- 15-45 minutes (peak selling)
- 45-60 minutes (recovery)
- Last 15 minutes (final push)
Peak Identification:
"Time-Based Sales Analysis:
Timeline: 8:00 PM - 9:00 PM
8:00-8:15 PM: Warm-up
- Viewers joining: 0 → 2,000
- Sales: 45 units (¥6,750)
- Activity: Building rapport, intro
8:15-8:45 PM: Peak Performance
- Viewers: 2,000 → 5,200 (peak)
- Sales: 520 units (¥78,000)
- Activity: Product demos, offers
- Key moment: 8:45 PM (150 units in 5 min)
8:45-9:00 PM: Final Push
- Viewers: 5,200 → 3,800
- Sales: 282 units (¥42,300)
- Activity: Last chance offers, urgency
Insights:
- Peak selling: 8:30-9:00 PM (63% of sales)
- Best offer placement: 8:45 PM
- Viewer retention: 73% for full hour
Optimization:
- Build anticipation first 15 min
- Make key offers at 30-45 min mark
- Save best deals for final 15 min
- Extend stream if momentum strong"
Identify Market Opportunities:
Product Trend Analysis Framework:
1. Rising Product Categories
Spot Emerging Demand:
Trend Metrics:
Search Volume Growth:
- Week-over-week change
- Month-over-month change
- Seasonal patterns
- Long-term trajectory
Sales Velocity:
- Units sold per day
- Days to sell out (inventory)
- Restock frequency
- Growth rate
Price Trends:
- Average selling price
- Price distribution
- Discount frequency
- Premium vs. budget split
Category Analysis:
"Rising Categories (March 2026):
Skincare: Hydrating Serums
- Search volume: +180% (past month)
- Sales growth: +150%
- Avg price: ¥150-200
- Top brands: [List]
- Key ingredients: HA, ceramides
- Opportunity: High demand, low competition
Beauty: Clean Makeup
- Search volume: +95% (past month)
- Sales growth: +85%
- Avg price: ¥120-180
- Trend: Natural, minimal
- Opportunity: Rising fast
Wellness: Stress Relief
- Search volume: +65% (past month)
- Sales growth: +70%
- Avg price: ¥80-150
- Trend: Aromatherapy, teas
- Opportunity: Emerging niche
Action: Prioritize hydrating serum inventory"
2. Competitor Product Analysis
Benchmark and Differentiate:
Analysis Elements:
Product Mix:
- What competitors sell
- Price points
- Product features
- Bundle strategies
- Unique selling propositions
Performance Data:
- Best-selling products
- Sales velocity
- Customer ratings
- Review sentiment
- Return rates
Pricing Intelligence:
"Competitor Product Pricing:
Our Hydrating Serum: ¥199
Competitor A: ¥179
- Features: 5% HA only
- Positioning: Budget
- Sales: High volume, low margin
Competitor B: ¥249
- Features: HA + peptides
- Positioning: Premium
- Sales: Moderate volume, high margin
Competitor C: ¥189
- Features: HA + ceramides
- Positioning: Mid-tier
- Sales: High volume, good margin
Our Positioning:
- Price: ¥199 (mid-range)
- Features: HA + ceramides + peptides
- Value: More ingredients than C at same price
- Differentiation: Superior formulation
Pricing Strategy:
- Competitive but not cheapest
- Emphasize ingredient quality
- Bundle for better value
- Premium positioning justified"
3. Seasonal Product Trends
Plan Inventory Calendar:
Seasonal Patterns:
Spring (March-May):
- Lightweight moisturizers
- Sun protection (SPF)
- Brightening products
- Flower-based ingredients
Summer (June-August):
- After-sun care
- Oil-control products
- Sweat-resistant makeup
- Body care
Autumn (September-November):
- Rich moisturizers
- Repair products
- Anti-aging focus
- Nourishing treatments
Winter (December-February):
- Heavy hydration
- Barrier repair
- Soothing products
- Gift sets
Seasonal Planning:
"Q2 Product Planning (April-June):
April: Spring Transition
Trending: Lightweight moisturizers (+80%)
Action: Stock 500 units
Forecast: Sell out by May 15
May: Sun Protection Prep
Trending: SPF products (+150%)
Action: Stock 1,000 units
Forecast: Sell out by June 30
June: Summer Hydration
Trending: Gel moisturizers (+120%)
Action: Stock 800 units
Forecast: Sell out by August
Inventory Investment:
- Total units: 2,300
- Total value: ¥345,000 (wholesale)
- Expected revenue: ¥805,000 (retail)
- ROI: 2.3x
Risk Management:
- Overstock risk: Low (strong trends)
- Stockout risk: Moderate (high demand)
- Strategy: 20% buffer stock"
4. Product Feature Analysis
Identify Winning Attributes:
Feature Performance:
Ingredient Popularity:
- Hyaluronic acid (always popular)
- Vitamin C (seasonal spikes)
- Retinol (steady demand)
- Niacinamide (rising fast)
- Ceramides (growing)
Packaging Trends:
- Pump bottles (convenience)
- Sustainable packaging (premium)
- Travel sizes (trial)
- Gift sets (gifting)
Feature Analysis:
"Product Feature Correlation:
High-Selling Products Share:
1. 'Contains hyaluronic acid' (87%)
2. 'Fragrance-free' (72%)
3. 'Suitable for sensitive skin' (68%)
4. 'Pump included' (65%)
5. 'Travel size available' (54%)
Low-Selling Products:
1. 'Strong fragrance' (only 23% have)
2. 'Jar packaging' (only 31% have)
3. 'No size options' (only 42% have)
Insights:
- HA is table stakes (must-have)
- Fragrance-free is expectation
- Sensitive skin friendly = broader market
- Pump preferred over jar
- Size options increase appeal
Product Development:
New formulation must include:
✓ Hyaluronic acid (primary ingredient)
✓ Fragrance-free
✓ 'Safe for sensitive skin' claim
✓ Pump dispenser
✓ Multiple size options
Avoid:
✗ Heavy fragrance
✗ Jar packaging
✗ Single size only"
5. Price Point Optimization
Find Sweet Spot:
Price Analysis:
Price Band Performance:
Under ¥100:
- Volume: Very high
- Margin: Low (30-40%)
- Competition: Intense
¥100-¥150:
- Volume: High
- Margin: Good (50-60%)
- Competition: Moderate
¥150-¥200:
- Volume: Medium-high
- Margin: Very good (65-75%)
- Competition: Manageable
¥200-¥300:
- Volume: Medium
- Margin: Excellent (75-85%)
- Competition: Low
Over ¥300:
- Volume: Low
- Margin: Excellent (80%+)
- Competition: Very low
Optimization:
"Current Price: ¥199
Band: ¥150-¥200 (sweet spot)
Performance at ¥199:
- Units sold/month: 800
- Revenue: ¥159,200
- Margin: 70%
- Profit: ¥111,440
Test ¥179 (lower band):
Projected units: 1,100 (+37%)
Projected revenue: ¥196,900 (+24%)
Projected margin: 65%
Projected profit: ¥127,985 (+15%)
Test ¥219 (upper band):
Projected units: 550 (-31%)
Projected revenue: ¥120,450 (-24%)
Projected margin: 75%
Projected profit: ¥90,338 (-19%)
Decision: Stay at ¥199
Current price maximizes profit
Moving to ¥179 increases volume but decreases
margin and profit per unit
Moving to ¥219 reduces volume significantly
Alternative: Keep ¥199, offer bundle discount
Bundle: ¥349 for 2 (effectively ¥174.50 each)
Increases units, maintains margin perception"
E-commerce Health Check:
Shop Analytics Framework:
1. Revenue and Traffic Analysis
Measure Shop Health:
Key Metrics:
Daily Revenue:
- Gross merchandise value (GMV)
- Net revenue (after returns)
- Average order value (AOV)
- Revenue by traffic source
Traffic Metrics:
- Unique visitors
- Page views
- Traffic sources (organic, paid, social)
- Bounce rate
Conversion Metrics:
- Conversion rate (visitors to buyers)
- Add-to-cart rate
- Checkout completion rate
- Cart abandonment rate
Dashboard Example:
"Shop Performance Dashboard (March 2026):
Traffic:
- Unique visitors: 12,500
- Page views: 45,000 (3.6 pages/visitor)
- Bounce rate: 42%
- Avg session duration: 4:32
Traffic Sources:
- Xiaohongshu organic: 45%
- Live streams: 30%
- Paid ads: 15%
- Direct: 10%
Revenue:
- Gross revenue: ¥458,000
- Returns: ¥23,000 (5%)
- Net revenue: ¥435,000
- Avg order value: ¥186
Conversion:
- Overall conversion: 3.8%
- Add-to-cart: 12%
- Checkout completion: 68%
- Cart abandonment: 32%
Performance Grade: B+
- Traffic: Good
- Conversion: Above average (3.5% benchmark)
- AOV: Healthy
- Returns: Low (good)"
2. Product Performance Ranking
Identify Winners and Losers:
Product Metrics:
Sales Velocity:
- Units sold per day
- Days in stock
- Sell-through rate
- Restock frequency
Profitability:
- Revenue per product
- Margin per product
- ROI ranking
- Inventory turn rate
Customer Satisfaction:
- Rating (1-5 stars)
- Review sentiment
- Return rate
- Repeat purchase rate
Product Ranking:
"Product Performance Report:
A-Tier (Superstars):
1. Hydrating Serum
- Monthly sales: 650 units (¥129,500)
- Margin: 72%
- Rating: 4.8/5
- Returns: 3%
- Verdict: Hero product, scale inventory
2. Gentle Cleanser
- Monthly sales: 420 units (¥46,200)
- Margin: 68%
- Rating: 4.7/5
- Returns: 4%
- Verdict: Strong performer, good add-on
B-Tier (Steady Sellers):
3. Night Cream
- Monthly sales: 280 units (¥56,000)
- Margin: 70%
- Rating: 4.6/5
- Returns: 5%
- Verdict: Consistent, keep in stock
4. Vitamin C Serum
- Monthly sales: 220 units (¥57,200)
- Margin: 65%
- Rating: 4.5/5
- Returns: 8%
- Verdict: Seasonal, increase in summer
C-Tier (Underperformers):
5. Eye Cream
- Monthly sales: 80 units (¥18,400)
- Margin: 62%
- Rating: 4.2/5
- Returns: 12%
- Verdict: Consider discontinuing
Action Plan:
- Increase A-Tier inventory by 50%
- Bundle B-Tier with A-Tier
- Discontinue C-Tier after inventory sold"
3. Customer Acquisition Cost
Measure Marketing Efficiency:
CAC Metrics:
By Channel:
- Xiaohongshu organic: CAC = ¥15
- Live streams: CAC = ¥25
- Paid ads: CAC = ¥45
- Influencer partnerships: CAC = ¥35
Lifetime Value (LTV):
- Avg customer lifetime: 18 months
- Avg monthly spend: ¥120
- Total LTV: ¥2,160
LTV:CAC Ratio:
- Organic: 2,160 / 15 = 144 (excellent)
- Live stream: 2,160 / 25 = 86.4 (very good)
- Paid ads: 2,160 / 45 = 48 (good)
- Influencers: 2,160 / 35 = 61.7 (good)
Optimization:
"CAC Analysis (March 2026):
Total marketing spend: ¥25,000
New customers acquired: 850
Blended CAC: ¥29.41
Channel Performance:
Organic (Xiaohongshu):
- Spend: ¥5,000 (content creation)
- Customers: 350
- CAC: ¥14.29 ✓ (best)
Live Streams:
- Spend: ¥8,000 (host fees, platform)
- Customers: 320
- CAC: ¥25.00 ✓ (good)
Paid Ads:
- Spend: ¥7,000
- Customers: 155
- CAC: ¥45.16 (acceptable)
Influencer Partnerships:
- Spend: ¥5,000 (product + fees)
- Customers: 140
- CAC: ¥35.71 ✓ (good)
Optimization:
1. Shift budget to organic (lowest CAC)
2. Increase live stream frequency (good CAC)
3. Optimize paid ads (currently high CAC)
4. Maintain influencer partnerships
Target: Blended CAC under ¥25"
4. Return and Refund Analysis
Understand Product Issues:
Return Metrics:
Overall Return Rate:
- Target: Under 5%
- Current: 4.2% ✓ (good)
- Trend: Stable
By Product:
- Hydrating Serum: 2.8% (low)
- Night Cream: 5.0% (acceptable)
- Vitamin C Serum: 8.0% (high ⚠️)
By Reason:
- Didn't work: 45%
- Skin reaction: 25%
- Wrong product: 15%
- Damaged shipping: 10%
- Changed mind: 5%
Analysis:
"Return Rate Analysis (Q1 2026):
Total returns: 87 units
Total sales: 2,068 units
Return rate: 4.2%
Product Breakdown:
Hydrating Serum: 18 returns (2.8%)
- Reasons: Didn't work (70%), Skin reaction (30%)
- Action: Improve description, manage expectations
Night Cream: 14 returns (5.0%)
- Reasons: Didn't work (60%), Skin reaction (40%)
- Action: Add sample sizes for trial
Vitamin C Serum: 22 returns (8.0%)
- Reasons: Skin reaction (80%), Didn't work (20%)
- Action: Reformulate (lower concentration), improve patch test advice
Cost of Returns:
- Refund amount: ¥15,660
- Shipping loss: ¥2,610
- Restocking cost: ¥1,305
- Total cost: ¥19,575 (4.5% of revenue)
Reduction Strategies:
1. Better product descriptions
2. Ingredient education
3. Sample sizes for trial
4. Patch test guidance
5. Improved packaging"
5. Inventory Optimization
Balance Stock and Demand:
Inventory Metrics:
Turnover Rate:
- Fast: Under 30 days
- Healthy: 30-60 days
- Slow: 60-90 days
- Dead stock: Over 90 days
Stockout Analysis:
- Frequency: How often out of stock
- Duration: How long out of stock
- Sales lost: Revenue missed
- Customer impact: Negative reviews
Overstock Risk:
- Aging inventory
- Holding costs
- Discounting required
- Obsolescence risk
Inventory Health:
"Inventory Analysis (March 31, 2026):
Fast-Movers (under 30 days):
- Hydrating Serum: 12 days ✓
- Stock: 200 units
- Monthly sales: 650
- Days of inventory: 9
- Action: Reorder 800 units
Healthy (30-60 days):
- Gentle Cleanser: 45 days ✓
- Stock: 150 units
- Monthly sales: 420
- Days of inventory: 11
- Action: Reorder 500 units
Slow-Movers (60-90 days):
- Night Cream: 75 days ⚠️
- Stock: 120 units
- Monthly sales: 280
- Days of inventory: 13
- Action: Bundle with serum, create promo
At Risk (over 90 days):
- Eye Cream: 120 days ⚠️
- Stock: 80 units
- Monthly sales: 80
- Days of inventory: 30
- Action: 50% off sale, consider discontinuing
Stockout Impact:
- February: Out of stock 5 days
- Missed sales: 108 units (¥21,492)
- Customer complaints: 15
- Negative reviews: 3
Action Plan:
1. Increase safety stock to 15 days
2. Improve demand forecasting
3. Reduce lead times with suppliers
4. Implement pre-order for backorders"
Benchmark and Outsmart:
Competitor Analysis Framework:
1. Shop Performance Benchmarking
Compare E-commerce Metrics:
Competitor Selection:
Direct Competitors:
- Similar products
- Same price range
- Overlapping audience
- Comparable size
Aspirational Competitors:
- Market leaders
- Larger operations
- Best practices to learn
Benchmark Metrics:
Revenue Comparison:
- Monthly GMV
- Growth rate
- Market share
- Year-over-year
Traffic Comparison:
- Monthly visitors
- Traffic sources
- Engagement rate
- Conversion rate
Example Benchmark:
"Shop Comparison (March 2026):
Your Shop:
- Monthly GMV: ¥435,000
- Growth: +15% from Feb
- Visitors: 12,500
- Conversion: 3.8%
- AOV: ¥186
Competitor A:
- Monthly GMV: ¥620,000
- Growth: +12%
- Visitors: 18,000
- Conversion: 4.2%
- AOV: ¥178
Competitor B:
- Monthly GMV: ¥380,000
- Growth: +18%
- Visitors: 10,000
- Conversion: 4.5%
- AOV: ¥195
Analysis:
Strengths:
- Higher AOV (¥186 vs ¥178 vs ¥195)
- Solid growth (15%)
- Competitive conversion (3.8%)
Opportunities:
- Increase traffic to match Competitor A
- Improve conversion to match Competitor B
- Launch new products to increase GMV
Gap to Competitor A:
GMV gap: ¥185,000
To close gap: Need 42% more revenue
Strategy: Increase conversion to 4.5% + traffic by 20%"
2. Pricing Strategy Analysis
Monitor and React:
Price Tracking:
Competitor Price Changes:
- Product pricing
- Bundle pricing
- Discount patterns
- Sale timing
Price Matching:
- Are we priced higher?
- Can we justify premium?
- Should we match or beat?
- Value differentiation
Competitive Response:
"Price Monitoring (Weekly):
Our Hydrating Serum: ¥199
Competitor A Similar Product: ¥179
- Price difference: ¥20 (10%)
- Their ingredients: HA only
- Our ingredients: HA + ceramides + peptides
- Differentiation: Superior formulation
- Strategy: Maintain price, emphasize quality
Competitor B Similar Product: ¥189
- Price difference: ¥10 (5%)
- Their ingredients: HA + ceramides
- Our ingredients: HA + ceramides + peptides
- Differentiation: Additional peptides
- Strategy: Slight premium justified
Competitor C Similar Product: ¥249
- Price difference: -¥50 (we're lower)
- Their ingredients: HA + ceramides + vitamin C
- Our ingredients: HA + ceramides + peptides
- Differentiation: Different value prop
- Strategy: Highlight our lower price
Pricing Strategy:
- Maintain ¥199 (sweet spot)
- Emphasize ingredient quality
- Bundle for better perceived value
- Never race to bottom (price war)
Price Elasticity Test:
- Tested ¥189 (10% off) for 1 week
- Result: 30% more sales, but 22% less profit
- Conclusion: Current pricing optimizes profit"
3. Promotional Strategy Monitoring
Learn from Competitor Campaigns:
Campaign Tracking:
Promotion Types:
- Percentage discounts
- Bundle deals
- Free gifts
- Flash sales
- Holiday specials
Timing Patterns:
- When they run promotions
- Duration of promotions
- Frequency of promotions
- Response to your promotions
Campaign Analysis:
"Competitor Promotion Calendar (March 2026):
Competitor A:
- March 1-7: 20% off everything
- March 15-17: Flash sale (48 hours)
- March 25-31: Buy 2 get 1 free
- Frequency: Aggressive
Competitor B:
- March 8-14: Spring sale (15% off)
- March 22-24: Weekend deal (25% off)
- Frequency: Moderate
Competitor C:
- March 5: Single-day promo (30% off)
- March 20-22: Mini flash sale
- Frequency: Light
Our Promotions:
- March 10-12: Live stream exclusive (20% off)
- March 28-30: End of month bundle (buy 2 get 1)
- Frequency: Light (maintain brand value)
Competitive Response:
When Competitor A runs 20% off:
- Monitor our sales impact
- If significant: Run complementary promo
- If minimal: Hold price, emphasize quality
Strategy:
- Don't match every promotion
- Maintain brand premium
- Focus on value over price
- Promote during their quiet periods"
4. Product Launch Tracking
Anticipate Market Moves:
Launch Monitoring:
New Product Signals:
- Teaser content
- Influencer previews
- Countdown posts
- Patent filings
- Supplier changes
Launch Analysis:
"Competitor New Product Launch:
Competitor A Launch: March 15
Product: Vitamin C + Retinol Serum
Price: ¥229
Positioning: Anti-aging powerhouse
Pre-Launch Signals:
- March 1: Teaser posts (spotted)
- March 8: Influencer previews (5 partners)
- March 12: Countdown posts
Launch Performance:
- First week sales: ~1,200 units (estimated)
- Reviews: 4.3/5 average
- Social mentions: 850+
- Influencer posts: 45+
Our Response:
Wait and watch:
- Monitor customer feedback
- Identify product weaknesses
- Look for market gaps
Competitive Launch:
If product successful:
- Launch our own Vitamin C serum (differentiated)
- Emphasize our unique formula
- Price strategically
Timeline: May 2026 (6 weeks after their launch)
Strategy: Learn from their mistakes, improve on their weaknesses"
5. Market Share Analysis
Understand Position in Ecosystem:
Market Metrics:
Category Share:
- Skincare category: Total market size
- Our share: Percentage
- Competitor shares: Map landscape
- Growth trends
Segment Leadership:
- By price tier (budget, mid, premium)
- By concern (dry skin, anti-aging, etc.)
- By ingredient (HA, vitamin C, etc.)
- By demographic (age, location)
Market Analysis:
"Dry Skincare Category (March 2026):
Total Market Size: ¥45M monthly
Market Share:
Your Brand: ¥2.16M (4.8%) ← #5
Competitor A: ¥6.75M (15%) ← #2
Competitor B: ¥4.95M (11%) ← #3
Competitor C: ¥3.60M (8%) ← #4
Leader: ¥9.00M (20%) ← #1
Share Growth:
- Your brand: +0.6% points (from 4.2%)
- Leader: +0.3% points (from 19.7%)
- Competitor A: -0.4% points (from 15.4%)
- Competitor B: +0.2% points (from 10.8%)
Segment: Dry Skincare, ¥100-200 Price Range
Total segment: ¥18M
Your share: ¥1.8M (10%) ← #3 in segment
Growing faster than category (18% vs 12%)
Insights:
- Gaining market share (good trajectory)
- Strong in mid-tier segment
- Opportunity: Challenge #2 spot in category
- Strategy: Focus on segment leadership"
Data-Driven Partnerships:
Influencer Commerce Analytics:
1. Influencer Sales Performance
Measure ROI by Partner:
Sales Metrics:
Per-Influencer Tracking:
- Revenue generated
- Units sold
- Conversion rate (viewers to buyers)
- Average order value
- ROI (revenue / cost)
Engagement Quality:
- Audience match score
- Comment quality
- Follower demographics
- Authenticity rating
Performance Report:
"Influencer Commerce Performance (Q1 2026):
Top Performers:
Influencer A (25k followers):
- Partnership cost: ¥3,000
- Revenue generated: ¥27,000
- Units sold: 180
- ROI: 9.0x
- Conversion: 12.5%
- Audience match: Perfect (dry skin focus)
- Verdict: Renew, increase investment
Influencer B (50k followers):
- Partnership cost: ¥6,000
- Revenue generated: ¥42,000
- Units sold: 280
- ROI: 7.0x
- Conversion: 9.8%
- Audience match: Very good
- Verdict: Solid performer, continue
Influencer C (100k followers):
- Partnership cost: ¥12,000
- Revenue generated: ¥36,000
- Units sold: 240
- ROI: 3.0x
- Conversion: 4.2%
- Audience match: Poor (too broad)
- Verdict: Decline to renew
Influencer D (8k followers):
- Partnership cost: ¥800 (product only)
- Revenue generated: ¥9,600
- Units sold: 64
- ROI: 12.0x
- Conversion: 18.5%
- Audience match: Perfect (niche)
- Verdict: Scale up (more partners like this)
Optimal Mix:
- 60% micro-influencers (1k-10k)
- 30% mid-tier (10k-50k)
- 10% macro (50k-100k+)
- Avoid: Low ROI macro influencers"
2. Commission Structure Analysis
Optimize Affiliate Programs:
Commission Models:
Flat Rate:
- 10% commission on all sales
- Simple to understand
- Easy to track
- Works for most products
Tiered Structure:
- 10% (up to ¥5k sales)
- 12% (¥5k-15k sales)
- 15% (¥15k+ sales)
- Incentivizes performance
Product-Based:
- 8% on low-margin products
- 15% on high-margin products
- Encourages strategic promotion
Commission Analysis:
"Affiliate Program Performance:
Current Structure:
- Flat rate: 12% commission
- 50 active affiliates
- Monthly sales: ¥180,000
- Commission paid: ¥21,600
- Avg per affiliate: ¥3,600 sales
Tiered Test (March):
- 10% (under ¥5k): 35 affiliates
- 12% (¥5k-15k): 12 affiliates
- 15% (over ¥15k): 3 affiliates
Results:
- Top 3 increased effort significantly
- Sales from top 3: ¥67,500 (from ¥45k)
- Total sales: ¥198,000 (+10%)
- Commission paid: ¥24,750 (vs ¥21,600 old)
- Incremental cost: ¥3,150
- Incremental revenue: ¥18,000
- ROI on tiered: 5.7x
Decision:
- Implement tiered structure
- Motivates top performers
- Net benefit: +14,850 profit
Next optimization:
- Test product-based commissions
- Higher margin products = higher commission"
3. Live Stream Host Comparison
Find Best Sales Partners:
Host Types:
Brand Host (Founder/Employee):
- Product knowledge: Excellent
- Sales skills: Variable
- Authenticity: High
- Cost: Salary + % of sales
- Best for: Product launches, education
Professional Streamer:
- Product knowledge: Good
- Sales skills: Excellent
- Authenticity: Medium
- Cost: Flat fee + commission
- Best for: Ongoing sales, promotions
Customer/Testifier:
- Product knowledge: Personal experience
- Sales skills: Low-medium
- Authenticity: Very high
- Cost: Product + small fee
- Best for: Testimonials, social proof
Host Performance:
"Host Performance Comparison:
Host A (Brand Founder):
- Streams: 4x/month
- Avg GMV/stream: ¥85,000
- Cost: ¥15,000 (salary) + 10% commission
- Net profit: ¥61,500/stream
- ROI: 3.6x
- Strength: Expertise, authenticity
Host B (Professional Streamer):
- Streams: 8x/month
- Avg GMV/stream: ¥45,000
- Cost: ¥8,000 (flat) + 15% commission
- Net profit: ¥30,250/stream
- ROI: 2.9x
- Strength: Sales skills, frequency
Host C (Customer Testifier):
- Streams: 2x/month
- Avg GMV/stream: ¥35,000
- Cost: ¥2,000 (product + fee)
- Net profit: ¥33,000/stream
- ROI: 16.5x (!!)
- Strength: Authenticity, trust
Optimal Strategy:
- Keep Host A (expertise important)
- Reduce Host B frequency (optimize ROI)
- Scale Host C model (find more customers)
- Target: 10 customer hosts like C
Projected with 10 customer hosts:
- Each: 2x/month
- GMV: ¥35,000 × 10 × 2 = ¥700,000
- Cost: ¥2,000 × 10 × 2 = ¥40,000
- Profit: ¥660,000
- ROI: 16.5x (excellent)"
4. Co-Branded Product Analysis
Evaluate Partnership Products:
Collaboration Metrics:
Product Performance:
- Sales velocity
- Customer reception
- Return rate
- Profit margin
- Brand lift
Partnership Success:
- Revenue split (fair?)
- Marketing contribution
- Inventory management
- Communication quality
- Repeat potential
Collaboration Example:
"Co-Branded Launch:
Partner: Popular Xiaohongshu influencer
Product: 'Influencer Name x Your Brand' limited edition
Price: ¥249 (premium)
Split: 50/50 revenue share
Performance:
- Launch month sales: 800 units
- Revenue: ¥199,200
- Our share: ¥99,600
- Cost of goods: ¥40,000
- Net profit: ¥59,600
- Margin: 60% (vs 70% own products)
Marketing Contribution:
- Influencer created: 5 posts, 2 lives, 1 video
- We created: 3 posts, paid ads, email marketing
- Their reach: 250k impressions
- Our reach: 150k impressions
- Combined: 400k impressions
Customer Feedback:
- Product rating: 4.7/5
- Return rate: 6% (slightly higher)
- Repeat purchase: 22% (lower than usual)
- Acquisition: 60% new customers (good!)
Analysis:
Pros:
- New customer acquisition (60%)
- Brand exposure (400k impressions)
- Influencer authenticity (social proof)
Cons:
- Lower margin (60% vs 70%)
- Higher returns (6% vs 4%)
- Lower repeat purchase (22% vs 35%)
- Complex logistics
Verdict: Successful, repeat annually (not ongoing)"
5. Affiliate Fraud Detection
Protect Your Investment:
Fraud Signals:
Suspicious Patterns:
- Unusual spike in sales (then cancellations)
- Same customer info (fake accounts)
- High return rate from one affiliate
- Click-to-conversion ratio (too perfect)
- Coupon stacking abuse
Detection Methods:
- Manual review of suspicious orders
- IP address tracking
- Customer validation
- Return rate monitoring
- Affiliate behavior analysis
Fraud Prevention:
"Fraud Detection Case:
Red Flags Raised:
Affiliate X: New partner, strong first month
Performance:
- Month 1 sales: ¥45,000 (unusually high)
- Units: 300 units
- Orders: 120 orders (avg ¥375 each)
- Return rate: 35% (very high!)
- Customer complaints: 25 (quality issues)
Investigation:
- Analyzed customer data
- Found patterns:
* 40 orders from same 5 IP addresses
* 80 orders to same shipping address
* 25 orders with suspicious emails
- Conclusion: Fraud (fake orders to earn commission)
Action Taken:
1. Blocked affiliate from program
2. Reversed commissions (¥5,400)
3. Cancelled suspicious orders
4. Blacklisted affiliate
5. Implemented stricter verification
New Safeguards:
- Manual review of first-time affiliates
- Hold commissions for 30 days (clearing period)
- Verified customer requirement (real people)
- Minimum account age (6 months)
- Return rate monitoring (flag over 15%)
Result:
- Fraud attempts: Down 90%
- Savings: ¥8,000/month in prevented fraud
- Affiliate quality: Improved significantly"
## Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Why Happens | Fix |
|---------|-------------|-----|
| Ignoring small data sets | Focus on big numbers | Track micro-conversions (cart adds, clicks) |
| Optimizing for revenue only | Easy metric | Focus on profit margin, not just sales |
| Copying competitor pricing | Seems safe | Differentiate on value, not price |
| Overstocking best-sellers | Fear of running out | Forecast demand accurately, hold safety stock |
| Not analyzing returns | Seen as cost of business | Investigate return reasons, improve products |
| Chasing low CAC blindly | Attractive number | Balance CAC with LTV and retention |
| Ignoring seasonality | Short-term focus | Plan inventory 2-3 months ahead |
## Real-World Impact
**Case Study: Ju Mama Data-Driven Growth**
- **Before**: Guessing inventory needs, 15% stockouts, 20% overstock
- **After**: Data-driven forecasting, optimal stock levels
- **Result**: 2% stockouts, 5% overstock, 35% increase in inventory efficiency
**Data-Backed Insights**:
- Real-time live stream analytics increases sales by 25% (optimize in moment)
- Product trend data reveals opportunities 3 weeks before competitors
- Competitor pricing monitoring prevents 15% revenue loss
- Inventory optimization reduces holding costs by 40%
- Influencer ROI analysis improves partnership selection by 3x
- Seasonal planning accuracy increases to 85% (from 60%)
- Return rate analysis reduces fraud by 90%
- Data-backed pricing increases margins by 20% (without losing volume)
## Related Skills
**REQUIRED**: Use e-commerce-optimization (overall online sales strategy)
**REQUIRED**: Use data-analytics (performance tracking and insights)
**Recommended**:
- **inventory-management** (stock optimization)
- **pricing-strategy** (optimal price points)
- **live-stream-sales** (real-time selling tactics)
- **competitor-analysis** (market intelligence)