Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From career-navigator
Benchmarks job search pipeline performance against industry norms for conversion rates, response timelines, ATS scores, and compensation.
npx claudepluginhub tmargolis/career-navigator --plugin career-navigatorHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/career-navigator:benchmarkThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Benchmark the user's pipeline performance against industry norms for their role, level, company size, and geography.
Runs four career analyst operations — outcome pattern analysis, transferable strengths, AI displacement assessment, and market benchmark — then produces a unified insight report and opens an interactive D3 pipeline dashboard. Invoke via /report or prompt triggers like 'run the analyst'.
Compares 2-4 assessment files from job applications across folders to analyze candidate performance patterns and generate strategic hiring recommendations.
Evaluates job postings (JD text or URL) against your profile with A-F match score, archetype analysis, compensation research, positioning strategy, and interview prep.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Benchmark the user's pipeline performance against industry norms for their role, level, company size, and geography.
Read {user_dir}/CareerNavigator/tracker.json. Count the total number of applications (any status). If fewer than 5:
"You need at least 5 applications to run a meaningful benchmark — you have {n} so far. Keep logging applications via
/career-navigator:track-applicationand run this again once you have more history."
Stop here if below threshold.
If ≥5 but fewer than 10 resolved outcomes, proceed with a note that results are preliminary.
Hand off to the analyst agent with:
CareerNavigator/tracker.jsonCareerNavigator/artifacts-index.jsonCareerNavigator/profile.mdUse the output from the analyst to render:
**Benchmark Report** — {today's date}
Data confidence: {Preliminary / Directional / Moderate / High} ({n} applications, {n} resolved outcomes)
PIPELINE CONVERSION
App → Response: {user%} (norm: {low}–{high}% · {above/below/at norm})
Response → Screen: {user%} (norm: {low}–{high}% · {above/below/at norm})
Screen → Interview: {user%} (norm: {low}–{high}% · {above/below/at norm})
Interview → Offer: {user%} (norm: {low}–{high}% · {above/below/at norm})
TIMELINES
Avg days to response: {n} days (norm: {low}–{high} days for {company size mix})
Ghosting rate: {user%} (norm: {low}–{high}% · {above/below/at norm})
ATS SCORES
Avg artifact score: {n}/100 (competitive threshold: 70+ · {above/below})
Lowest artifact: {score} — {filename}
MARKET CONTEXT
{1–2 sentences on geographic competitiveness and role-level supply/demand for user's target}
GAPS TO ADDRESS
{Numbered list of the 1–3 metrics most below norm, with a one-line interpretation each}
STRENGTHS
{1–2 metrics above norm — acknowledge what's working}
If a metric cannot be calculated (e.g., no offers yet, so interview → offer rate is undefined), show — and note why.
Based on the lowest-performing metric:
/career-navigator:resume-score against your weakest-performing artifact."/career-navigator:pattern-analysis to see which ExperienceLibrary units are in stalled applications."/career-navigator:track-application to ensure follow-ups are scheduled."/career-navigator:ats-optimization to surface the highest-impact fixes on your active artifacts."