Applies a consistent, opinionated founder writing voice to newsletter content. Activates when the user wants to write in founder voice, match their style, rewrite content to sound more authentic, or needs newsletter prose that reads like a real founder — not a marketer. Covers tone calibration, sentence rhythm, opinion injection, practical framing, and anti-patterns.
From founder-osnpx claudepluginhub thecloudtips/founder-os --plugin founder-osThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
references/voice-examples.mdDesigns and optimizes AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, observation formats, error recovery, and context for higher task completion rates.
Enables AI agents to execute x402 payments with per-task budgets, spending controls, and non-custodial wallets via MCP tools. Use when agents pay for APIs, services, or other agents.
Compares coding agents like Claude Code and Aider on custom YAML-defined codebase tasks using git worktrees, measuring pass rate, cost, time, and consistency.
Apply a consistent, opinionated writing voice to newsletter content. Used by: /founder-os:newsletter:draft and /newsletter commands when composing or editing newsletter sections. This skill defines the tone, rhythm, opinion style, and structural patterns that distinguish a founder-written newsletter from generic content marketing.
Write as a founder who has built things, made mistakes, and is sharing lessons with peers — not as a marketer, journalist, or academic. The voice sits at the intersection of three qualities:
Professional: Demonstrate domain expertise. Use precise terminology where it matters. Back claims with specifics — numbers, timelines, named tools, real outcomes. Never dumb down for the sake of accessibility.
Conversational: Write the way a smart founder talks to another founder over coffee. Use contractions. Ask rhetorical questions. Interrupt a point to add a sidebar. Let personality show through. Address the reader directly but sparingly — prefer "most founders" over "you" when making generalizations.
Opinionated: Take a position and own it. Do not hedge with "it depends" unless genuinely explaining a trade-off. State what works, what does not, and why. Readers subscribe for perspective, not for balanced summaries they could get from a search engine.
Calibrate between two failure modes:
| Too Corporate | Target Zone | Too Casual |
|---|---|---|
| "We are pleased to present our analysis of market trends" | "Three things changed this month that every SaaS founder should know about" | "lol this blew up on Twitter so here we go" |
| "Stakeholders should consider the implications" | "If you are running a team under 20, this changes how you hire" | "honestly idk but it seems kinda wild" |
| "It is worth noting that industry consensus suggests" | "Most founders I talk to are getting this wrong. Here is why." | "hot take but whatever" |
The target zone is authoritative without being stiff, direct without being sloppy.
Alternate between short, punchy sentences (4-10 words) and longer explanatory ones (15-25 words). Short sentences carry the opinion. Long sentences carry the evidence.
Pattern: Statement. Expansion. Statement. Evidence. Transition.
Open every section or major point with a strong declarative sentence. Follow it with context, reasoning, or a specific example that earns the claim.
When introducing a development, trend, or tool, follow this sequence:
Variant trigger phrases for opinion injection:
Every piece of news, trend, or insight must answer: "What does this mean for the reader, and what should they do about it?"
After presenting information, insert a practical bridge before moving on:
Open with a brief personal anecdote (2-4 sentences) that illustrates a problem or realization. Transition with a bridge sentence. Deliver the lesson.
Structure:
Show the contrast between the old way and the new way. Make the reader feel the pain of "before" and the relief of "after."
Structure:
State a problem the reader likely faces. Validate it. Present a solution with implementation detail.
Structure:
Reject the following patterns in all newsletter content. When encountered in draft text, rewrite to eliminate them.
Remove or replace these phrases on sight:
| Jargon | Replacement |
|---|---|
| "leverage" (as verb) | "use" |
| "synergize" / "synergies" | name the specific benefit |
| "move the needle" | "increase [specific metric] by [amount]" |
| "at the end of the day" | cut the phrase entirely |
| "circle back" | "revisit" or "follow up on" |
| "deep dive" | "detailed look at" or "breakdown of" |
| "paradigm shift" | describe the actual change |
| "best-in-class" | name what makes it better and than what |
| "thought leadership" | never use — show expertise through content, do not label it |
| "scalable solution" | name the specific capability and its limit |
| "ecosystem" (unless literally) | name the actual components |
| "robust" | name the specific quality: reliable, fast, handles edge cases |
Never open a newsletter or section with:
Use active voice by default. Passive voice is acceptable only when the actor is genuinely unknown or irrelevant (e.g., "The feature was deprecated" when the company has not been named). If an agent or subject exists, name it.
Limit passive constructions to no more than one per five sentences.
Never structure an entire newsletter as a numbered list of items with no connecting narrative. Lists are tools, not structures. A newsletter is a narrative with lists inside it, not a list with narrative dressing.
Rules for list usage:
Remove weak qualifiers that undermine authority:
Refer to ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/newsletter/founder-voice/references/voice-examples.md for detailed before-and-after rewrite examples demonstrating how to transform generic content marketing into founder voice.