From research-forge
Generate a polished, investor-ready due diligence report. Supports remote URLs, local directories, and local files as analysis targets.
npx claudepluginhub tercel/tercel-claude-plugins --plugin research-forgeThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Generate a formal, polished due diligence report ready for sharing.
Guides Next.js Cache Components and Partial Prerendering (PPR) with cacheComponents enabled. Implements 'use cache', cacheLife(), cacheTag(), revalidateTag(), static/dynamic optimization, and cache debugging.
Guides building MCP servers enabling LLMs to interact with external services via tools. Covers best practices, TypeScript/Node (MCP SDK), Python (FastMCP).
Generates original PNG/PDF visual art via design philosophy manifestos for posters, graphics, and static designs on user request.
Generate a formal, polished due diligence report ready for sharing.
/research-forge:report/research-forge:report <target> [--lang zh|en] [--output path/to/output.md]
./research-reports/[project-name]-due-diligence-[date].md/research-forge:analyze workflow internally.Generate a formal document with the following sections:
# [Project Name] — Due Diligence Report
> Analysis Date: [Date] | Analyst: Research-Forge | Verdict: [Verdict]
> Target: [URL or Local Path]
## Executive Summary
[3-5 sentence overview with key finding and recommendation]
## 1. Project Overview
- Name, URL/path, founding date, team size
- One-paragraph description
- Key metrics snapshot table
## 2. Business & Market Analysis
### 2.1 Problem & Solution
### 2.2 Business Model & Monetization
### 2.3 Market Size & Timing
### 2.4 Competitive Landscape
### 2.5 Adoption & Community Traction
**Business Score: X.X / 5.0**
## 3. Technical & Architecture Analysis
### 3.1 Tech Stack & Architecture
### 3.2 Technical Moat
### 3.3 Code & Engineering Quality
### 3.4 Scalability & Performance
### 3.5 Security & Reliability
**Technical Score: X.X / 5.0**
## 4. Investment Thesis
### 4.1 Bull Case
### 4.2 Bear Case / Key Risks
### 4.3 Team Assessment
### 4.4 Comparable Outcomes
## 5. Scorecard
| Dimension | Rating | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Acuteness | X/5 | ... |
| Solution Fit | X/5 | ... |
| Business Model Clarity | X/5 | ... |
| Market Timing | X/5 | ... |
| Competitive Position | X/5 | ... |
| Adoption Momentum | X/5 | ... |
| Architecture Quality | X/5 | ... |
| Technical Moat | X/5 | ... |
| Engineering Culture | X/5 | ... |
| Scalability | X/5 | ... |
| Security Posture | X/5 | ... |
| Documentation | X/5 | ... |
| **Overall** | **X.X / 5.0** | |
## 6. Verdict & Recommendation
[Final verdict with confidence level and recommended next steps]
## Appendix
- Data sources and references
- Methodology notes
- Disclaimer