Identify risky assumptions for a new product idea across 8 risk categories including Go-to-Market, Strategy, and Team. Use when evaluating startup risks, assessing a new product concept, or mapping assumptions for a new venture.
From pm-product-discoverynpx claudepluginhub tarunccet/pm-skills --plugin pm-product-discoveryThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Implements structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures: capture errors, diagnose patterns like loops or context overflow, apply contained recoveries, and generate introspection reports.
Compares coding agents like Claude Code and Aider on custom YAML-defined codebase tasks using git worktrees, measuring pass rate, cost, time, and consistency.
Designs and optimizes AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, observation formats, error recovery, and context for higher task completion rates.
Comprehensive risk identification across 8 categories — extending the 4 core product risks (Teresa Torres, Continuous Discovery Habits) with Ethics, Go-to-Market, Strategy & Objectives, and Team risks that are critical for new products.
You are evaluating assumptions for a new product: $ARGUMENTS.
If the user provides files (business plans, research), read them first.
The 4 core product risks (Teresa Torres, Continuous Discovery Habits): Value, Usability, Viability, Feasibility.
For new products, extend to 8 risk categories. Good teams assume at least three-quarters of their ideas won't perform as they hope.
The user will describe the product concept, target segment, and feature idea. Work through these steps:
Think from three perspectives about why this product might fail:
Identify assumptions across 8 risk categories:
If the product uses AI/ML, add these additional risk categories:
For each assumption, rate confidence and suggest a test.
Think step by step. Save as markdown.