Using Systems-Thinking (Meta-Skill Router)

Your entry point to systems thinking methodology. This skill routes you to the right combination of systems analysis skills for understanding complex, interconnected problems.

Purpose

This is a meta-skill that:

1. ✅ Routes you to the correct systems thinking skills
2. ✅ Combines multiple skills for comprehensive analysis
3. ✅ Provides workflows for common problem types
4. ✅ Explains when to use systems thinking vs other approaches

You should use this skill: When facing complex problems with feedback loops, delays, unintended consequences, or persistent failures despite interventions.

---

How to Access Reference Sheets

IMPORTANT: All reference sheets are located in the SAME DIRECTORY as this SKILL.md file.

When this skill is loaded from: skills/using-systems-thinking/SKILL.md

Reference sheets like causal-loop-diagramming.md are at: skills/using-systems-thinking/causal-loop-diagramming.md

NOT at: skills/causal-loop-diagramming.md ← WRONG PATH

When you see a link like [causal-loop-diagramming.md](causal-loop-diagramming.md), read the file from the same directory as this SKILL.md.

---

Core Philosophy: Think in Systems

The Central Idea

Linear Thinking: Problem → Solution → Fixed

• Assumes cause and effect are close in time and space
• Ignores feedback loops and delays
• Leads to "fixes that fail" and escalation
• Symptoms return or move elsewhere

Systems Thinking: Structure → Behavior → Intervention

• Recognizes feedback loops create behavior
• Delays cause intuition failures
• Small interventions at leverage points beat brute force
• Address root causes, not symptoms

When This Pack Applies

✅ Use systems-thinking when:

• Problems persist despite repeated fixes
• Solutions create new problems (unintended consequences)
• System behavior is counter-intuitive
• Multiple stakeholders with conflicting incentives
• Long delays between action and result
• "The harder we push, the harder the system pushes back"

❌ Don't use systems-thinking when:

• Simple, isolated problems with clear cause-effect
• One-time decisions with immediate results
• Pure optimization (no feedback dynamics)
• Well-understood linear processes

---

Pack Overview: 6 Core Skills

Wave 1: Foundation and Pattern Recognition

1. recognizing-system-patterns

When to use: ANY complex problem - start here Teaches: S-curves, feedback loops (reinforcing/balancing), delays, stock-flow thinking Examples: Viral growth, technical debt, burnout spirals Time: 45-60 min Key insight: Behavior patterns reveal underlying structure

2. systems-archetypes-reference

When to use: Recognize recurring problem patterns Teaches: 10 classic archetypes (Fixes that Fail, Shifting the Burden, Escalation, etc.) Examples: Feature factory, hero culture, arms race Time: 60-90 min Key insight: Most problems match known patterns with known solutions

3. leverage-points-mastery

When to use: Design interventions, prioritize where to act Teaches: Donella Meadows' 12 leverage points hierarchy Examples: Constants (weak) vs rules vs paradigms (powerful) Time: 60-75 min Key insight: Small changes at high leverage points beat large changes at low points

Wave 2: Quantitative Analysis

4. stocks-and-flows-modeling

When to use: Predict future states, calculate equilibrium, analyze accumulation dynamics Teaches: Formal notation, equilibrium analysis, time constants, delay analysis Examples: Customer churn, bug backlog, burnout accumulation Time: 75-90 min Key insight: Quantification elevates from "will get worse" to "6.7 weeks to crisis"

5. causal-loop-diagramming

When to use: Map system structure, communicate feedback dynamics, find root causes Teaches: 6-step construction process, polarity testing, loop identification Examples: Death spirals, virtuous cycles, balancing processes Time: 60-75 min Key insight: Systematic construction prevents polarity errors that change diagnosis

6. behavior-over-time-graphs

When to use: Show trajectories, compare scenarios, communicate dynamics over time Teaches: 7-step construction, 70-80% scale rule, ASCII standards, validation Examples: S-curve adoption, crisis timing, intervention impact Time: 60-75 min Key insight: "What happens over time" with concrete numbers and dates

---

Routing Logic: Which Skills Do I Need?

Decision Tree

START: What's your goal?

├─ UNDERSTAND A PROBLEM (First time encountering complexity)
│  ├─ Start here → recognizing-system-patterns
│  ├─ Does it match a known pattern? → systems-archetypes-reference
│  └─ What behavior over time? → behavior-over-time-graphs
│
├─ MAP SYSTEM STRUCTURE (How does this work?)
│  ├─ Identify feedback loops → causal-loop-diagramming
│  ├─ Calculate accumulation → stocks-and-flows-modeling
│  └─ Show dynamics → behavior-over-time-graphs
│
├─ DESIGN INTERVENTIONS (What should we do?)
│  ├─ Identify leverage points → leverage-points-mastery
│  ├─ Predict outcomes → stocks-and-flows-modeling + behavior-over-time-graphs
│  └─ Match to archetype solution → systems-archetypes-reference
│
├─ COMMUNICATE TO STAKEHOLDERS (Convince others)
│  ├─ Executive version → behavior-over-time-graphs (with $ impacts)
│  ├─ Technical version → causal-loop-diagramming + stocks-and-flows-modeling
│  └─ Pattern recognition → systems-archetypes-reference ("We're in Fixes that Fail")
│
└─ QUANTITATIVE PREDICTION (When will crisis hit? How many?)
   ├─ Calculate trajectory → stocks-and-flows-modeling
   ├─ Visualize scenarios → behavior-over-time-graphs
   └─ Validate structure → causal-loop-diagramming

---

Common Problem Types and Skill Combinations

Scenario 1: "Our Solution Keeps Failing"

Symptoms:

• Applied fix multiple times
• Problem returns or gets worse
• "We tried everything"

Routing Sequence:

1. systems-archetypes-reference → Recognize "Fixes that Fail" or "Shifting the Burden"
2. causal-loop-diagramming → Map the reinforcing loop keeping problem alive
3. leverage-points-mastery → Find intervention point (probably addressing root cause, not symptom)
4. behavior-over-time-graphs → Show "with fix" vs "without fix" vs "address root cause"

Why this sequence:

• Archetypes give you the pattern (quick recognition)
• CLD maps the specific instance
• Leverage points guide where to intervene
• BOT graphs communicate to stakeholders

Scenario 2: "Growth is Slowing / Hitting Limits"

Symptoms:

• Initial success, now plateauing
• S-curve behavior
• Limits to growth

Routing Sequence:

1. recognizing-system-patterns → Identify S-curve, find the balancing loop
2. stocks-and-flows-modeling → Calculate time to saturation, equilibrium capacity
3. systems-archetypes-reference → "Limits to Growth" archetype
4. leverage-points-mastery → Options: expand limit, find new growth, stabilize
5. behavior-over-time-graphs → Show trajectory with/without limit expansion

Why this sequence:

• Pattern recognition confirms S-curve
• Stock-flow gives you numbers (when hits limit?)
• Archetype provides intervention options
• Leverage points prioritize options
• BOT graphs show impact

Scenario 3: "We're in a Vicious Spiral"

Symptoms:

• Self-reinforcing decline
• "The harder we work, the worse it gets"
• Death spiral, burnout, quality collapse

Routing Sequence:

1. recognizing-system-patterns → Identify reinforcing loop (R)
2. causal-loop-diagramming → Map the specific reinforcing structure
3. systems-archetypes-reference → Match to "Escalation" or "Success to the Successful"
4. stocks-and-flows-modeling → Calculate time to crisis (when does morale hit 0?)
5. leverage-points-mastery → Break the loop (add balancing feedback)
6. behavior-over-time-graphs → Show crisis timing + intervention impact

Why this sequence:

• Pattern recognition identifies reinforcing dynamic
• CLD maps exact structure (what's reinforcing what?)
• Archetype gives tested solutions
• Stock-flow calculates urgency
• Leverage points find where to break loop
• BOT graphs communicate stakes

Scenario 4: "Delay Between Action and Result"

Symptoms:

• Decisions based on old information
• Overshooting, oscillation
• "We keep over/under correcting"

Routing Sequence:

1. recognizing-system-patterns → Identify delay, oscillation pattern
2. stocks-and-flows-modeling → Calculate delay time constant, D/R ratio
3. causal-loop-diagramming → Mark delays on causal links (||)
4. systems-archetypes-reference → "Shifting the Burden to the Intervenor" (long-term fix delayed)
5. behavior-over-time-graphs → Show overshoot/undershoot pattern

Why this sequence:

• Pattern recognition confirms delay issue
• Stock-flow quantifies delay danger (D/R > 0.5 = crisis)
• CLD visualizes where delays are
• Archetype matches delay-based patterns
• BOT graphs show oscillation

Scenario 5: "Presenting to Executives"

Goal: Get buy-in for systems-based solution

Routing Sequence:

1. behavior-over-time-graphs → LEAD with this (clear, visual, $$ impacts)
   • "Current trajectory: 6.7 weeks to crisis"
   • "With intervention: stabilizes at 80% capacity"
2. systems-archetypes-reference → Frame as known pattern ("We're in Fixes that Fail")
3. leverage-points-mastery → Justify intervention choice ("This is a high-leverage point")
4. causal-loop-diagramming → BACKUP ONLY (if asked "why does this happen?")

Why this sequence:

• Executives want impact first (BOT graphs)
• Pattern names create shared language (archetypes)
• Leverage points justify resource allocation
• CLDs available if deep dive needed

Scenario 6: "Multi-Variable System (Technical Debt, Velocity, Morale)"

Symptoms:

• Many interacting variables
• Hard to see connections
• Non-obvious causality

Routing Sequence:

1. causal-loop-diagramming → Map all variables and causal links
2. stocks-and-flows-modeling → Calculate multi-stock dynamics (debt, morale, velocity all accumulate)
3. behavior-over-time-graphs → Show multi-variable trajectories (separate panels or dual-axis)
4. leverage-points-mastery → Identify highest leverage variable

Why this sequence:

• CLD handles many variables well
• Stock-flow models accumulation of each
• BOT graphs show multiple trajectories
• Leverage points prioritize where to act

---

Step-by-Step Workflows

Workflow 1: Systematic Problem Analysis (80% of use cases)

Process:

1. recognizing-system-patterns (15 min) - What patterns appear? S-curve? Reinforcing loop?
2. systems-archetypes-reference (20 min) - Does this match a known archetype?
3. causal-loop-diagramming (30 min) - Map the specific structure
4. stocks-and-flows-modeling (45 min) - Quantify key stocks, calculate time constants
5. leverage-points-mastery (20 min) - Identify high-leverage interventions
6. behavior-over-time-graphs (30 min) - Show current trajectory + intervention scenarios

Total time: ~2.5-3 hours Output: Complete systems analysis with quantitative predictions and intervention design

Workflow 2: Quick Pattern Recognition (When time-limited)

Process:

1. recognizing-system-patterns (15 min) - Quick pattern ID
2. systems-archetypes-reference (20 min) - Match to archetype, use archetype's standard solution

Total time: ~35 min Output: Pattern diagnosis + known solution approach Trade-off: No quantification, no custom structure mapping

Workflow 3: Executive Presentation Prep

Process:

1. stocks-and-flows-modeling (45 min) - Calculate key numbers (crisis timing, costs, ROI)
2. behavior-over-time-graphs (40 min) - Create executive-friendly graphs ($$ impact)
3. leverage-points-mastery (15 min) - Justify intervention choice
4. systems-archetypes-reference (10 min) - Frame with archetype name

Total time: ~110 min Output: Executive presentation with quantified impact

Workflow 4: Deep Technical Analysis

Process:

1. recognizing-system-patterns (15 min) - Pattern confirmation
2. causal-loop-diagramming (60 min) - Detailed structure mapping, polarity validation
3. stocks-and-flows-modeling (90 min) - Multi-stock equations, sensitivity analysis
4. behavior-over-time-graphs (45 min) - Multi-scenario comparison
5. leverage-points-mastery (30 min) - Evaluate intervention points

Total time: ~4 hours Output: Comprehensive technical analysis with validated structure and quantified scenarios

---

Skill Dependencies and Learning Path

Learning Path for Beginners

Start here if new to systems thinking:

1. recognizing-system-patterns (REQUIRED FIRST)

   • Foundation for all other skills
   • Teaches core concepts: stocks, flows, feedback, delays
   • Builds intuition for system behavior

2. systems-archetypes-reference (LEARN SECOND)

   • Pattern library accelerates analysis
   • Provides vocabulary (names for patterns)
   • Gives tested solutions

3. Choose path based on needs:

   • Quantitative path → stocks-and-flows-modeling → behavior-over-time-graphs
   • Structural path → causal-loop-diagramming → leverage-points-mastery

Skill Dependencies

No prerequisites:

• recognizing-system-patterns (START HERE)

Requires recognizing-system-patterns:

• systems-archetypes-reference (builds on patterns)
• causal-loop-diagramming (uses feedback loop concepts)
• stocks-and-flows-modeling (uses stock/flow distinction)
• leverage-points-mastery (uses system structure concepts)
• behavior-over-time-graphs (uses pattern recognition)

Works better together:

• stocks-and-flows-modeling + behavior-over-time-graphs (calculate, then visualize)
• causal-loop-diagramming + leverage-points-mastery (map structure, find intervention)
• systems-archetypes-reference + leverage-points-mastery (pattern → known leverage points)

---

Rationalization Resistance Table

Rationalization	Reality	Counter-Guidance	Red Flag
"Just add more resources"	Resource additions often activate balancing loops	"Route to leverage-points-mastery - this is lowest-leverage point (constants)"	Ignoring system structure
"This isn't a system, it's a simple bug"	Bugs that persist are symptoms of system structure	"Route to systems-archetypes-reference - likely 'Fixes that Fail'"	Linear thinking on complex problems
"We don't have time for analysis"	Crisis timing requires stock-flow calculation	"Route to stocks-and-flows-modeling - 15 min calculation vs wrong 6-month commitment"	Analysis paralysis fear
"Our situation is unique"	90% match archetypes	"Route to systems-archetypes-reference - most 'unique' problems aren't"	Not invented here syndrome
"Just draw a quick diagram"	Polarity errors change diagnosis (R vs B)	"Route to causal-loop-diagramming - use systematic 6-step process"	Skipping validation
"Intuition says it will get worse"	Intuition fails on delays, non-linear dynamics	"Route to stocks-and-flows-modeling - calculate, don't guess"	Overconfidence in intuition
"We need to act NOW"	Acting without understanding wastes resources	"Route to recognizing-system-patterns - 15 min pattern ID prevents months of wrong solution"	Action bias
"Too complicated to model"	Most systems can be modeled simply	"Route to stocks-and-flows-modeling - start with 1-2 stocks"	Complexity avoidance
"Graphs are for presentations, not analysis"	Graphs reveal patterns invisible in tables	"Route to behavior-over-time-graphs - construction process IS analysis"	Separating analysis from communication

---

Red Flags Checklist

Watch for these signs of incorrect approach:

• Linear Thinking: "X causes Y, so fix X" (ignoring feedback loops)
• Symptom Treating: Addressing symptoms without mapping structure
• Resource Obsession: Only considering "add more people/money" solutions
• Analysis Paralysis: Trying to model everything instead of starting simple
• Skipping Validation: Drawing CLDs without polarity double-test
• Gut-Feel Quantification: "Probably double in 6 months" without calculation
• Graph Manipulation: Tweaking scale to make problems look bigger/smaller
• Archetype Forcing: Forcing problem into wrong archetype
• Ignoring Delays: Not marking delays on CLDs or calculating time constants
• Single-Skill Fixation: Using only one tool (e.g., only CLDs, no quantification)

If any red flag triggered → STOP → Route to appropriate skill(s)

---

When NOT to Use This Pack

Clarify boundaries with other approaches:

Problem Type	Use Instead	Reason
Well-understood algorithm optimization	Standard profiling/optimization	No feedback dynamics
One-time decision with immediate result	Decision analysis, expected value	No time dynamics
Pure data analysis / statistics	Data science methods	Not about system structure
Legal/compliance requirements	Ordis security-architect	Different domain
Pure UX research	Lyra ux-designer	Different methodology
Code architecture	Axiom system-architect	Code structure, not system dynamics

Edge case: Software architecture CAN have systems dynamics (technical debt accumulation, team coordination). Use both system-architect (structure) AND systems-thinking (dynamics).

---

Integration with Other Packs

Simulation-Foundations (Yzmir)

• Use together when: Need to implement simulation based on systems model
• Workflow: systems-thinking (design) → simulation-foundations (implementation)
• Example: Model ecosystem with stocks-and-flows → implement with differential-equations-for-games

System-Architect (Axiom)

• Use together when: Software architecture decisions have feedback dynamics
• Workflow: system-architect (code structure) + systems-thinking (team/process dynamics)
• Example: Microservices architecture (static) + team coordination dynamics (systems thinking)

Deep-RL (Yzmir)

• Use together when: Training RL agents in systems with feedback
• Workflow: systems-thinking (environment analysis) → deep-rl (agent design)
• Example: Understand ecosystem dynamics with causal-loop-diagramming → train agents with actor-critic-methods

---

Summary: Start Here

First time with systems thinking? → recognizing-system-patterns (foundation skill, 45-60 min)

Problem keeps returning despite fixes? → systems-archetypes-reference → Find "Fixes that Fail" or "Shifting the Burden"

Need to predict future states? → stocks-and-flows-modeling → Calculate time to crisis, equilibrium

Need to map system structure? → causal-loop-diagramming → Visualize feedback loops

Need to design intervention? → leverage-points-mastery → Find high-leverage points

Need to communicate dynamics? → behavior-over-time-graphs → Show trajectories over time

Not sure where to start? → Use this router skill! Ask diagnostic questions:

• "Is this problem persisting despite fixes?"
• "Are there delays between action and result?"
• "Do we understand the feedback loops?"
• "What's the goal: understand, map, intervene, or communicate?"

Most common workflow: recognizing-system-patterns → systems-archetypes-reference → causal-loop-diagramming → stocks-and-flows-modeling → leverage-points-mastery → behavior-over-time-graphs

Time for complete analysis: 2.5-4 hours (depending on complexity)

Key principle: Start with patterns, match to archetypes, map structure, quantify dynamics, find leverage, visualize scenarios.

---

Systems Thinking Specialist Skills Catalog

After routing, load the appropriate specialist skill for detailed guidance:

1. recognizing-system-patterns.md - Foundation: S-curves, feedback loops, delays, stock-flow thinking, pattern recognition
2. systems-archetypes-reference.md - 10 classic archetypes: Fixes that Fail, Shifting the Burden, Escalation, recurring patterns
3. leverage-points-mastery.md - Donella Meadows' 12 leverage points, intervention design, prioritization
4. stocks-and-flows-modeling.md - Quantitative modeling: equilibrium analysis, time constants, accumulation dynamics
5. causal-loop-diagramming.md - Structure mapping: 6-step construction, polarity testing, loop identification
6. behavior-over-time-graphs.md - Trajectory visualization: 7-step construction, scenario comparison, communication