From autonoma-marketing
Autonoma's quality assurance system: 6-dimension scoring rubric, peer-review process, threshold enforcement, and degradation protection. Use whenever evaluating, scoring, or improving content quality. This is what makes Autonoma different from every other marketing tool.
npx claudepluginhub savinoo/autonoma-marketing-pluginThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
The core differentiator of the Autonoma marketing pipeline. Every piece of content goes through a structured quality gate before delivery.
Provides Ktor server patterns for routing DSL, plugins (auth, CORS, serialization), Koin DI, WebSockets, services, and testApplication testing.
Conducts multi-source web research with firecrawl and exa MCPs: searches, scrapes pages, synthesizes cited reports. For deep dives, competitive analysis, tech evaluations, or due diligence.
Provides demand forecasting, safety stock optimization, replenishment planning, and promotional lift estimation for multi-location retailers managing 300-800 SKUs.
The core differentiator of the Autonoma marketing pipeline. Every piece of content goes through a structured quality gate before delivery.
Most AI content tools generate and deliver. Autonoma generates, then reviews from a different perspective, then delivers only what passes quality thresholds. This mirrors how real marketing teams work: a copywriter writes, an editor reviews.
The key insight: the same AI can produce much better content when it systematically critiques its own work from a different perspective (Creator vs Reviewer).
| # | Dimension | Weight | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hook Power | 20% | If nobody reads past line 1, nothing else matters |
| 2 | Authenticity | 20% | AI-generated slop is instantly recognizable and ignored |
| 3 | Value Density | 20% | Every sentence must earn its place |
| 4 | Engagement Potential | 15% | Content that doesn't spark interaction is wasted |
| 5 | Credibility | 15% | Claims without evidence damage trust |
| 6 | Platform Optimization | 10% | Wrong format = algorithmic burial |
Two conditions must BOTH be met:
weighted_average >= 4.0 (overall quality bar)
min(all_dimensions) >= 3.0 (no catastrophic weakness)
Content that scores 4.5 average but has a 2.0 on authenticity FAILS — because one weak dimension undermines the whole piece.
Full creative freedom, following brand voice and platform guidelines.
Switch to a completely different perspective. The Reviewer:
| Scenario | Apply? | Threshold |
|---|---|---|
/autonoma:generate (new content) | Yes | >= 4.0 |
/autonoma:review (existing content) | Score only | N/A (informational) |
/autonoma:distribute (adaptations) | Yes | >= 3.5 (lower for adaptations) |
| Quick edits or tweaks | No | N/A |
Bad feedback: "Make it more engaging" Good feedback: "Add a specific metric in paragraph 2. Replace the generic closing with a provocative question about whether AI agents will replace marketing teams within 2 years."
Feedback must be: