Stats
Actions
Tags
Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From archora-research
Generates devil's advocate critiques from methodological, theoretical, and practical perspectives to stress-test research claims before writing or submitting.
npx claudepluginhub richard-kim-79/archora-skillsHow this skill is triggered โ by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/archora-research:counterargumentThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing โ used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Generate adversarial critiques to stress-test research claims before writing or submitting.
Critiques research papers evaluating methodology, claims-evidence alignment, and contribution significance. Activates on 'critique this paper', 'review this research', 'analyze this study' queries.
Challenges ideas, plans, decisions, and proposals using structured critical reasoning modes: devil's advocate, pre-mortem, red team, Socratic questioning, and evidence falsification.
Analyzes claims by mapping arguments, auditing evidence quality, detecting logical fallacies and biases, and issuing verdicts. For evaluating research or technical arguments.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Generate adversarial critiques to stress-test research claims before writing or submitting.
| Perspective | Icon | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Methodological | ๐ฌ | Study design, measurement validity, statistical approach, reproducibility |
| Theoretical | ๐ | Conceptual framework, alternative explanations, literature gaps |
| Practical | โ๏ธ | Feasibility, generalizability, real-world applicability, ethical concerns |
# โ๏ธ Counterargument Analysis
## Summary
[2โ3 sentences: overall assessment of the research's vulnerability to critique]
## Counterarguments
### ๐ Theoretical Critique โ [SHORT TITLE]
**Challenged Claim:** [Exact claim being challenged]
**Critique:** [Specific, evidence-grounded critique. Reference timescales, measurement limits,
alternative frameworks, or published contradictory evidence where possible.]
**Rebuttal Strategy:** [Concrete suggestion: what experiment, analysis, or argument would
address this critique]
---
### ๐ฌ Methodological Critique โ [SHORT TITLE]
...
Weak: "The sample size might be too small."
Strong: "The proposed sample of n=15 animals achieves 80% power only for effect sizes of ฮทยฒโฅ0.25. Given the typical effect sizes in STDP studies (ฮทยฒ=0.10โ0.15, e.g., Bi & Poo 1998), this is underpowered. A power analysis targeting ฮทยฒ=0.12 would require n=38 per condition."