From prism-devtools
Use to systematically validate documents, stories, or processes against defined checklists. Ensures quality and completeness.
npx claudepluginhub resolve-io/.prismThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
<!-- Powered by PRISMâ„¢ Core -->
checklists/architect-checklist.mdchecklists/architecture-validation-checklist.mdchecklists/change-checklist.mdchecklists/code-quality-checklist.mdchecklists/documentation-quality-checklist.mdchecklists/peer-review-checklist.mdchecklists/po-master-checklist.mdchecklists/story-dod-checklist.mdchecklists/story-draft-checklist.mdEnables AI agents to execute x402 payments with per-task budgets, spending controls, and non-custodial wallets via MCP tools. Use when agents pay for APIs, services, or other agents.
Provides patterns for autonomous Claude Code loops: sequential pipelines, agentic REPLs, PR cycles, de-sloppify cleanups, and RFC-driven multi-agent DAGs. For continuous dev workflows without intervention.
Applies NestJS patterns for modules, controllers, providers, DTO validation, guards, interceptors, config, and production TypeScript backends with project structure and bootstrap examples.
checklists/)Systematically validate documents, stories, or processes against defined checklists to ensure quality and completeness.
Check ./checklists/ folder for:
Determine Checklist:
Choose Processing Mode:
Each checklist specifies required artifacts:
Locate documents per checklist requirements.
Interactive Mode: For each section:
YOLO Mode:
For each item:
validation:
item: "Checklist item text"
status: "[x] Complete | [ ] Missing | [!] Warning | [N/A] Not Applicable"
finding: "What was found or missing"
severity: "Critical | Major | Minor | Info"
recommendation: "Specific action if needed"
evidence: "Link to doc/section supporting status"
Some checklists include scoring:
scoring:
section_scores:
requirements: 8/10
design: 7/10
testing: 9/10
total_score: 24/30 (80%)
threshold: 75% (PASS/FAIL)
confidence: "High | Medium | Low"
Report Structure:
# Checklist Validation Report
## Summary
- Checklist: {name}
- Document: {what was validated}
- Date: {timestamp}
- Mode: {Interactive|YOLO}
- Overall Status: {PASS|FAIL|CONDITIONAL}
## Critical Findings
[List any blockers or critical issues]
## Section Results
### Section 1: {Name}
- Items Checked: X
- Passed: Y
- Warnings: Z
- Not Applicable: W
Key Findings:
- [Finding 1]
- [Finding 2]
### Section 2: {Name}
[Continue for all sections]
## Recommendations
### Immediate Actions
1. {Critical fix needed}
2. {Blocker to resolve}
### Improvements
1. {Enhancement suggestion}
2. {Process improvement}
## Metrics
- Total Items: X
- Compliance Rate: Y%
- Critical Issues: Z
- Estimated Fix Time: {hours}
## Next Steps
1. Address critical issues
2. Review with team
3. Update documentation
4. Re-run validation
For story checklists, include:
For sprint checklists:
Based on validation results:
If PASS:
If CONDITIONAL:
If FAIL: