From strategic-frameworks
Researches and integrates new strategic frameworks into the system using web search, quality validation, and file creation. Use when users request adding frameworks not in library or none fit.
npx claudepluginhub przemocny/strategic-frameworksThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
This skill helps users research and add new strategic frameworks to the Strategic Frameworks library. The approach is **rigorous and evidence-based** - only real, documented, proven frameworks are added.
Facilitates 30-60 minute workshops applying strategic frameworks like Design Thinking via dialogue, loading definitions from references/frameworks/, saving outputs to .frameworks-output/.
References strategic frameworks for product, business, and service strategy. Guides evaluation of alternatives, prioritization (RICE, ICE), journey mapping, growth planning (Ansoff), and analysis.
Amplifies reasoning for complex problems: decomposes into bounded contexts, architects systems, evaluates alternatives, classifies issues, defines quality using First Principles Framework (FPF).
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
This skill helps users research and add new strategic frameworks to the Strategic Frameworks library. The approach is rigorous and evidence-based - only real, documented, proven frameworks are added.
Core principles:
Output: New framework file created, integrated into system, and ready to use via use-framework
Goal: Understand what user needs and why.
Questions to ask:
Problem/Need:
Framework Knowledge:
Category:
Use Case:
Determine approach:
If user knows specific framework:
If user doesn't know specific framework:
Goal: Find 2-3 candidate frameworks matching user's need.
Research approach:
Formulate search queries:
Use WebSearch extensively:
Initial screening: For each candidate, quickly check:
Present options to user:
## Framework Candidates
I found 3 frameworks that might fit:
### 1. [Framework Name] by [Creator]
**What it is:** [1-2 sentence description]
**Why it fits:** [How it addresses user's need]
**Source:** [Where it's documented]
### 2. [Framework Name] by [Creator]
**What it is:** [Description]
**Why it fits:** [Fit reasoning]
**Source:** [Documentation]
### 3. [Framework Name] by [Creator]
**What it is:** [Description]
**Why it fits:** [Fit reasoning]
**Source:** [Documentation]
Which would you like me to research deeply and add to the system?
Goal: Comprehensive investigation of selected framework and validation against quality criteria.
What to research (comprehensive):
Use references/research-checklist.md as guide. Research systematically:
Framework Identity
Framework Methodology
Practical Application
Real-World Validation
Learning Resources
Keywords for Matching
Quality validation:
Check against references/quality-criteria.md. Assess:
FATAL DISQUALIFIERS (Stop if present): ๐ด AI-generated or made-up framework ๐ด No credible sources or citations ๐ด Duplicate of existing framework in library ๐ด Fundamentally flawed methodology ๐ด Controversial/unethical framework
REQUIRED ELEMENTS (Must have all): โ Real creator with credentials โ Clear origin and publication date โ Structured methodology with steps โ Real-world examples (at least 2) โ Credible sources (at least 3) โ Practical applicability โ Unique value vs existing frameworks
NICE TO HAVE (Not required but valuable): โญ Multiple case studies โญ Tools or templates โญ Academic papers โญ Wide industry adoption โญ Books or comprehensive guides
Validation decision:
Goal: Create properly formatted framework file.
Steps:
Determine framework number:
frameworks/ folderCreate filename:
[number]-[framework-name].md39-scamper-technique.mdUse template from references/framework-template.md:
# [Framework Name]
## Overview
[2-3 sentence description of what this framework is and what it helps accomplish]
## Creator & Origin
**Created by:** [Name(s) with credentials]
**When:** [Year]
**Context:** [Why was it created? What problem was it solving? What was happening at the time?]
**Original source:** [Book, paper, or initial publication]
## Target Audience
**Best for:**
- [User type 1] - [why]
- [User type 2] - [why]
- [User type 3] - [why]
**Not ideal for:**
- [Situation where it doesn't fit]
## When to Use This Framework
**Use this framework when:**
- [Situation 1]
- [Situation 2]
- [Situation 3]
**Don't use this framework when:**
- [Situation where alternative is better]
## Framework Structure
### Phase 1: [Phase Name]
**Goal:** [What this phase accomplishes]
**Key questions:**
- [Question 1]
- [Question 2]
- [Question 3]
**Output:** [What you produce in this phase]
### Phase 2: [Phase Name]
[Same structure for each phase...]
[Continue for all phases/steps]
## Real-World Examples
### Example 1: [Company/Person] - [Context]
**Situation:** [What challenge they faced]
**Application:** [How they used the framework]
**Outcome:** [What happened as a result]
### Example 2: [Company/Person] - [Context]
[Same structure]
### Example 3: [Company/Person] - [Context]
[Same structure - at least 2 examples required, 3 preferred]
## Notable Users
**Companies:**
- [Company 1]
- [Company 2]
- [Company 3]
**Thought Leaders:**
- [Name 1]
- [Name 2]
## Sources & Further Reading
**Essential:**
- [Original book/paper with full citation]
- [Key article or guide]
- [Official website if exists]
**Additional:**
- [Supplementary resource 1]
- [Supplementary resource 2]
**Videos/Courses:**
- [If available]
## Keywords
For framework matching:
- [keyword1]
- [keyword2]
- [keyword3]
- [problem-type]
- [situation-context]
- [domain/industry]
Fill in all sections:
Review for quality:
Goal: Integrate new framework into system.
Steps:
Save framework file to both locations:
frameworks/[number]-[framework-name].md
skills/use-framework/references/frameworks/[number]-[framework-name].md
(Both locations must have identical files)
Update frameworks-index.md:
Open skills/choose-framework/references/frameworks-index.md
Add new entry in appropriate category:
### [Category Name]
[... existing frameworks ...]
**[Number]. [Framework Name]** by [Creator]
- [One-line description]
- **Use for:** [primary use case]
- **Keywords:** [keyword1], [keyword2], [keyword3]
Update choose-framework matching logic: Consider if SKILL.md needs updates to mention new framework in:
Verify integration:
Goal: Confirm success and offer to test new framework.
Show user what was added:
# Framework Successfully Added! ๐
## What was created:
**Framework:** [Framework Name] by [Creator]
**Number:** [XX]
**Category:** [Strategic/Decision/Innovation/Operations/Mental Models]
**Files created:**
- `frameworks/[filename].md`
- `skills/use-framework/references/frameworks/[filename].md`
**Index updated:**
- Added to `frameworks-index.md` under [Category]
## Framework Summary
[2-3 sentences about the framework]
**Best for:** [Primary use cases]
**Notable users:** [2-3 companies/people]
## Next Steps
Would you like to:
1. **Test the framework:** Use `/use-framework [Framework Name]` to try it with your situation
2. **Add another framework:** Use `/discover-framework` again
3. **Learn more:** I can explain how to apply this framework
Offer to test:
/use-framework [name]"If during research you discover framework is already in library (maybe under different name):
Response: "I found that [Framework Name] is already in our library as [Existing Framework].
[Show existing framework details]
Would you like to:
/use-framework [name]If framework doesn't meet quality standards:
Response: "I researched [Framework Name], but it doesn't meet our quality criteria because:
Our library maintains high quality standards - we only add real, proven frameworks.
Would you like me to:
If new framework is essentially same as existing one:
Response: "[Framework Name] is very similar to [Existing Framework] already in our library. They both:
The main difference is [key difference].
Would you like to:
If you can't find enough information:
Response: "I found [Framework Name] but couldn't find enough credible information to add it:
This might mean:
Would you like to:
Before marking framework as complete, verify:
Research completeness:
Quality criteria met:
Integration complete:
frameworks/skills/use-framework/references/frameworks/File quality:
๐ซ AI-generated frameworks - ChatGPT created, no real origin ๐ซ Blog post "frameworks" - Random blog coined term, no adoption ๐ซ Unvalidated methodologies - No one actually uses it ๐ซ Repackaged existing frameworks - Just renamed something that exists ๐ซ Overly complex academic models - Theory with no practical application ๐ซ Fad frameworks - Trendy but no substance ๐ซ Self-help guru "systems" - Motivational speech, not framework
Test: Would serious business leaders, academics, or practitioners use this? If not, don't add it.
references/framework-template.md - Template structure for new frameworksreferences/research-checklist.md - What to research about frameworksreferences/quality-criteria.md - Standards for accepting frameworks