From solopreneur
Plans or directly implements code from tickets, specs, designs, or descriptions. Generates Cursor-compatible plans or builds with Claude, manages git branches and ticket dependencies.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/solopreneur:build ticket, spec, or feature descriptionticket, spec, or feature descriptionThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
You are handling implementation for the CEO. Determine the input type from `$ARGUMENTS`:
You are handling implementation for the CEO. Determine the input type from $ARGUMENTS:
.solopreneur/backlog/{dir}/MVP-001.md), read the ticket for requirements, acceptance criteria, and technical notes. Also read backlog.md in the same directory for dependency context — check that all blocking tickets (listed in depends_on) have status: done or status: tested before proceeding. If blockers remain, tell the CEO which tickets need to be completed first and suggest building one of those instead..solopreneur/designs/{date}-{slug}/), read design-brief.md inside it and scan for .html mockup files — these contain the visual structure the engineer should implement.Before doing anything else, ask the CEO:
How would you like to build this?
- Plan only — I'll create a plan file you can take to Cursor (or any other coding agent)
- Build it now — I'll write the code directly, right here
Wait for their answer before proceeding. If they say "plan", follow the Plan Path. If they say "build" (or "now", "do it", "just build it", etc.), follow the Direct Path.
If building from a ticket file, set up an isolated branch before building:
Check for active ticket branches: Run git branch to see if any ticket/* branches exist that are not yet merged. If another ticket branch is currently checked out, ask the CEO:
You're currently on branch
ticket/{OTHER-ID}. To start this ticket, I need to switch branches.
- Switch now — I'll save your current work and switch to a new branch for this ticket
- Finish the other ticket first — Let's wrap up {OTHER-ID} before starting this one
- Build in parallel — Use
/solopreneur:sprintto build multiple tickets simultaneously
If the CEO chooses to switch: commit or stash any uncommitted changes on the current branch, then proceed.
Create the ticket branch:
git checkout -b ticket/{ID}
Update the ticket file: Set status: in-progress and branch: ticket/{ID} in the YAML frontmatter.
Adapt explanation to user's technical level: If .solopreneur/preferences.yaml exists, read it for the CEO's git comfort level. Explain accordingly:
ticket/MVP-001"If preferences don't exist yet, ask the CEO: "Quick question — how comfortable are you with git? (I use it daily / I know the basics / What's git?)" and save their answer to .solopreneur/preferences.yaml.
Check if .solopreneur/preferences.yaml has a deployment key. If yes, skip this step entirely.
If no deployment strategy exists yet, ask the CEO:
Where should this run when it's ready? The engineer will set up deployment based on your tech stack. Common options:
- Vercel — Best for Next.js, React, static sites (free tier available)
- Netlify — Similar to Vercel, good for static sites and serverless
- GitHub Pages — Free, simple, static sites only
- I'll figure it out later — Skip for now, we'll set it up when you're ready to ship
Not sure? The engineer can recommend one based on what we're building.
If the CEO picks a platform or asks for a recommendation:
@engineer to configure the project for that platform:
npm i -g vercel)vercel.json, netlify.toml).mcp.jsonvercel link, etc.).solopreneur/preferences.yaml:
deployment:
platform: vercel # or netlify, github-pages, fly, railway, custom, none
configured: true
notes: "Next.js app on Vercel, linked via CLI"
rollback: "Run `vercel rollback` or go to vercel.com/[project]/deployments and promote the previous deployment"
If the CEO picks "I'll figure it out later", save:
deployment:
platform: none
configured: false
This step only runs once. Subsequent /build calls skip it because the preference exists.
Delegate to the @engineer subagent to create a plan file following the standard plan format (from conventions). The engineer should break the work into 3-8 sequential steps with instructions specific enough that another agent can execute without additional context. Build-specific additions to the plan:
**Branch**: \ticket/{ID}`` in the Context section (ticket builds only)## Deployment Notes section if deployment was just configured (platform, config files created, setup status)Save the plan:
.solopreneur/backlog/{dir}/{ID}-plan.md.solopreneur/plans/build-{feature-slug}.md (create the directory if needed)Present a summary of the plan to the CEO:
End with the handoff prompt (adapt for ticket builds):
For ticket builds:
-> Next: Take this plan to your coding agent (Cursor, Windsurf, etc.) for execution:
Make sure you're on branch `ticket/{ID}`, then open:
.solopreneur/backlog/{date}-{slug}/{ID}-plan.md
Tell it: "Execute this plan step by step"
When the code is written, come back for review and merge:
/solopreneur:review .solopreneur/backlog/{date}-{slug}/{ID}.md
For non-ticket builds:
-> Next: Take this plan to your coding agent (Cursor, Windsurf, etc.) for execution:
Open .solopreneur/plans/{filename} and tell it:
"Execute this plan step by step"
When done, come back and run:
/solopreneur:review
Delegate to the @engineer subagent to plan and execute the implementation directly. The engineer should:
.solopreneur/backlog/{dir}/{ID}-plan.md; otherwise save to .solopreneur/plans/build-{feature-slug}.mdOnce the engineer finishes, present a summary:
If building from a ticket: Update the ticket YAML — set status: built, populate the ## Files section with files created/modified. Then suggest review:
-> Ticket {ID} is built on branch `ticket/{ID}`. Let's review it:
/solopreneur:review .solopreneur/backlog/{dir}/{ID}.md
If not a ticket build: End with the review prompt:
-> Next: Let's review what was built:
/solopreneur:review
npx claudepluginhub pcatattacks/solopreneur-pluginImplements features from chat context or description via full agent workflow without tickets, boards, or status updates. Loads domain skills, plans, codes, tests, and opens PR.
Executes an implementation plan — writes code and tests, runs quality review, and ships a pull request.
Orchestrates a full build pipeline from PRD: plans tasks, implements in parallel, and reviews results. Routes simple work to a lighter workflow.