From wtf
Performs brutally honest code reviews identifying code smells, anti-patterns, and issues with severity ratings, then refactors proportionally using edit tools. For 'wtf is this' or refactor requests.
npx claudepluginhub pacaplan/wtf --plugin wtfThis skill is limited to using the following tools:
Look at a piece of code, tell the truth about it, and then make it better.
Reviews code for quality issues by reading files, checking patterns in references/patterns.md, identifying anti-patterns via Grep, and suggesting specific improvements. Use for reviews and refactoring, not new features.
Reviews code focusing on quality, readability, logical errors, error handling, complexity reduction, edge cases, and maintainability. Coordinates pr-review-toolkit tools if available. Use for PR reviews.
Guides Next.js Cache Components and Partial Prerendering (PPR): 'use cache' directives, cacheLife(), cacheTag(), revalidateTag() for caching, invalidation, static/dynamic optimization. Auto-activates on cacheComponents: true.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Look at a piece of code, tell the truth about it, and then make it better.
Identify the target code. Either:
$ARGUMENTS (file path, function name, class name)Deliver the honest assessment. For each issue found:
Common things to look for:
Refactor it. Don't just complain — fix it:
Deliver the verdict:
**The Diagnosis:** [One-sentence summary of the code's condition]
**What Was Wrong:**
- [Issue 1 — what it was and why it matters]
- [Issue 2 — etc.]
**What I Did About It:**
- [Change 1]
- [Change 2]
**The Prognosis:** [Is this code healthy now, or is there more to address?]
$ARGUMENTS mention a specific concern ("this class is way too long"), focus there first.