From wtf
Challenges agent's recent claims and forces genuine re-examination using code-reading tools when users push back with 'wtf are you thinking', 'that's wrong', or similar.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/wtf:are-you-thinkingThis skill is limited to the following tools:
The summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
The user is pushing back on something the agent just said. Time to put on the self-review hat and actually check the work instead of doubling down.
The user is pushing back on something the agent just said. Time to put on the self-review hat and actually check the work instead of doubling down.
Identify the claim being challenged. Look at the most recent substantive response. If $ARGUMENTS point to something specific, focus there.
Re-examine with fresh eyes. Do not defend the previous position by default. Instead:
Deliver the verdict. One of three outcomes:
If the original response was wrong: Own it completely. Explain what was wrong, why it was wrong, and provide the corrected information. No hedging, no "well, it depends."
If the original response was right but poorly explained: Acknowledge the user's confusion is justified, then re-explain with better evidence. Show the receipts — point to specific code, docs, or behavior that supports the claim.
If it's genuinely ambiguous: Lay out both sides honestly. Explain the trade-offs without pretending there's a clear winner when there isn't.
npx claudepluginhub pacaplan/wtf --plugin wtfChallenges claims by verifying accuracy, completeness, and reasoning against code, docs, or data. Use for sanity-checking decisions, evaluating assertions, or 'are you sure?' prompts.
Applies adversarial fresh-context review to non-trivial decisions in code. Use when correctness matters more than speed, in unfamiliar code, or for high-stakes operations.
Subjects non-trivial decisions to a fresh-context adversarial review before finalizing. Use for high-stakes code, unfamiliar logic, or when correctness outweighs speed.