test-plan-case-implement

Test Case Implementation Generator

Generate executable test automation code (pytest, etc.) from TC-*.md test case specification files, with intelligent auto-placement in component repos or downstream E2E repo.

Usage

/test-plan-case-implement <FEATURE_SOURCE> [--test-cases TC-API-001,TC-API-002] [--target-repo ~/Code/opendatahub-tests]

Examples:

• /test-plan-case-implement features/notebooks/RHAISTRAT-400-notebook-spawning
• /test-plan-case-implement https://github.com/fege/collection-tests/pull/7 (GitHub PR)
• /test-plan-case-implement test-plan/RHAISTRAT-400 (GitHub branch)
• /test-plan-case-implement https://github.com/fege/collection-tests/pull/7 --test-cases TC-API-001,TC-API-002 (selective)
• /test-plan-case-implement features/notebooks/RHAISTRAT-400 --target-repo ~/Code/opendatahub-tests

Note: After publishing a test plan, artifacts only exist on the PR branch. Pass the PR URL:

/test-plan-publish
/test-plan-case-implement https://github.com/fege/collection-tests/pull/7

Inputs

From arguments

Parse $ARGUMENTS to extract:

1. First argument (required): Feature source - local directory, GitHub PR URL, or GitHub branch containing test case artifacts
   • Local path: features/notebooks/RHAISTRAT-400-notebook-spawning
   • GitHub PR: https://github.com/org/repo/pull/7
   • GitHub branch: https://github.com/org/repo/tree/test-plan/RHAISTRAT-400 or test-plan/RHAISTRAT-400
2. --test-cases (optional): Comma-separated list of test case IDs to implement (e.g., TC-API-001,TC-API-002,TC-E2E-001)
3. --target-repo (optional): Override auto-detected target repository path or URL

If the first argument is missing or starts with --, fail with usage error showing required format and PR/local path examples.

Process

Step 0: Pre-flight Checks

0.0 Python dependencies

Install the test-plan package (makes all scripts importable):

(cd $(git -C ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} rev-parse --show-toplevel) && uv sync --extra dev)

If installation fails, inform the user and do NOT proceed.

0.1 Locate feature directory

Parse the first argument from $ARGUMENTS (strip any leading/trailing whitespace, ignore flags).

If no feature source provided or first arg starts with --, exit with the error message from the "From arguments" section above.

If feature source is a GitHub branch or PR URL:

(cd $(git -C ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} rev-parse --show-toplevel) && uv run python scripts/repo.py locate-feature-dir "<feature_source>")

Extract feature_dir from the JSON result.

If feature source is a local path, use it directly as feature_dir.

0.2 Run preflight checks

Run unified preflight validation and detection:

(cd $(git -C ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} rev-parse --show-toplevel) && uv run python scripts/preflight.py "$feature_dir")

The script returns JSON with:

• valid (bool) - If false, show error and stop
• feature_dir, tc_count, testplan_frontmatter
• frontmatter_components, content_components, all_components
• repos (component → repo mapping)
• unique_repos (list of detected repositories)
• repos_from_frontmatter (repos from Jira components - highest priority)
• odh_test_context_path (or null if not found)

Extract values from the JSON result as needed for subsequent steps.

0.3 Handle odh-test-context if not found

If odh_test_context_path == "null", ask user via AskUserQuestion:

odh-test-context not found. Provides test conventions for ~162 opendatahub-io repos.

1. Specify path to existing clone
2. Clone from GitHub to ~/Code/
3. Proceed without it (slower, less accurate)

Handle user choice.

0.4 Confirm target repository

Based on unique_repos from preflight:

If 1 repo: Ask "Proceed with {repo}?" (yes/specify-different)

If multiple repos: Show list prioritized by frontmatter components, ask user to choose

If no repos: Ask user to specify repository manually

Store: code_repo (e.g., opendatahub-io/notebooks)

0.5 Locate code repository

Find code repo locally:

code_repo_path=$(cd $(git -C ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} rev-parse --show-toplevel) && uv run python scripts/repo.py find-target "$code_repo")

If not found, ask to clone or specify path.

Step 1: Load Testing Context

IMPORTANT: When analyzing code_repo_path: Read code files and use grep/bash. Do NOT import target repo dependencies (not in test-plan venv) or use inspect.signature().

1.0 Load odh-test-context for code repository

Call load_repo_test_context(repo_name, odh_test_context_path) from scripts/utils/repo_utils.py.

The function:

1. Checks for <odh_test_context_path>/tests/<repo_name>.json
2. Returns: context dict (if found) or None (if not found)
3. Context dict contains: framework, directories, commands, conventions, linting, agent_readiness, container_recipe

Set variables:

• test_context = function result (dict or None)
• use_odh_context = True if test_context is not None, else False

If test_context exists, save it to <feature_dir>/test_implementation_context.json for reference.

1.0b Load downstream E2E repository context

Call load_repo_test_context('opendatahub-tests', odh_test_context_path) from scripts/utils/repo_utils.py.

The function returns: context dict or None

Set downstream_context:

• If result is not None: use the context dict (contains framework, conventions, markers, agent_readiness)
• If result is None: use defaults: {'testing': {'framework': 'pytest'}, 'agent_readiness': 'medium'}

1.1 Detect test framework

Use scripts/utils/repo_utils.py::get_framework(test_context):

If test_context exists: returns test_context['testing']['framework']

If NOT (manual detection):

1. Checks for pytest indicators (pytest.ini, pyproject.toml, conftest.py)
2. Checks for unittest indicators (import unittest in .py files)
3. Checks for Playwright indicators (playwright.config.js/ts)
4. Checks for Robot Framework indicators (*.robot files)
5. Checks for Go testing indicators (*_test.go files, Ginkgo imports)
6. Checks for Jest indicators (jest.config.js, .spec.ts files, describe/it blocks)
7. Checks for Cypress indicators (.cy.ts/.cy.js files, cy. commands)
8. If unknown: asks user via AskUserQuestion

Returns: framework (str: pytest, unittest, playwright, robot, ginkgo, go-testing, jest, cypress)

1.2 Load test conventions

If use_odh_context == True:

Extract conventions and format as markdown:

(cd $(git -C ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} rev-parse --show-toplevel) && uv run python scripts/extract_and_format_conventions.py "$feature_dir" "$code_repo_name" "$odh_test_context_path") > <feature_dir>/test_implementation_conventions.md

The script:

• Loads test context from odh-test-context
• Saves test_implementation_context.json to feature_dir
• Extracts conventions (file patterns, markers, linting, etc.)
• Outputs formatted markdown

Set conventions_file = <feature_dir>/test_implementation_conventions.md

If use_odh_context == False (no odh-test-context available):

1. Conventions will be minimal (framework only, from Step 1.1)
2. Test generation will rely more heavily on Tiger Team pattern guides (Step 1.2b)
3. Generated tests may be less optimized for the specific repo
4. For new components: Consider contributing to odh-test-context for future use:
   • Repository: https://github.com/opendatahub-io/odh-test-context
   • Add JSON file: tests/<repo_name>.json with discovered framework, test directories, conventions, linting tools
   • See existing files in tests/ directory as examples
   • Improves test quality for all future test generation on this component

Store: conventions (dict or markdown content)

1.2b Load testing pattern guides

Load repo instructions and pattern guides:

(cd $(git -C ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} rev-parse --show-toplevel) && uv run python scripts/load_pattern_guides.py "$code_repo_path" "$framework")

Returns JSON with:

• repo_instructions_files - Found CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, CONSTITUTION.md
• repo_instructions_content - Combined content
• pattern_guide_files - Found {framework}-tests.md, testing-standards.md
• pattern_guide_content - Combined content
• needs_generation - true if no pattern guides found

If needs_generation == true:

1. Locate Tiger Team:

   (cd $(git -C ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} rev-parse --show-toplevel) && uv run python scripts/repo.py find-known tiger-team)
   

2. If found: Invoke /test-rules-generator <code_repo_path> to generate guides
3. If not found: Ask user to clone Tiger Team or proceed without guides

Pattern guides describe HOW to write tests (fixtures, naming, mocking). Passed to code generation sub-agents in Step 5.

1.3 Offer container validation

If use_odh_context == True AND test_context contains container_recipe:

1. Show user the container validation option via AskUserQuestion:

   Container validation is available using odh-test-context.

   • Base image: <container_recipe.base_image>
   • Can validate linting and test execution in isolated environment

   Validate generated tests in container after creation? [yes/no]

2. If yes: Set validate_in_container = True and store validation_recipe = test_context['container_recipe']

3. If no: Set validate_in_container = False

If container recipe NOT available:

1. Set validate_in_container = False

Step 2: Per-TC Placement Analysis

Extract repository capabilities from Step 1:

• code_repo_readiness from test_context.get('agent_readiness', 'unknown')
• code_repo_has_tests from checking if 'tests' in test_context.get('testing', {}).get('directories', [])
• downstream_readiness from downstream_context.get('agent_readiness', 'medium')

Invoke test-plan.analyze.placement forked subagent:

placement_decisions = invoke_skill_forked(
    "test-plan.analyze.placement",
    args={
        'feature_dir': feature_dir,
        'code_repo': code_repo,
        'code_repo_readiness': code_repo_readiness,
        'code_repo_has_tests': code_repo_has_tests,
        'downstream_readiness': downstream_readiness
    }
)

The subagent analyzes each TC and returns placement recommendations with:

• Test level classification (unit, integration, k8s-integration, api, e2e)
• Placement scores (same_repo, downstream, both)
• Recommended placement with reasoning
• User confirmation (accept all or review/override per TC)

Placement Philosophy (applied by subagent):

• P0 strongly prefers upstream for fast feedback (blocks PRs early)
• K8s API ≠ Full Stack: K8s integration tests can use envtest in component repo
• E2E requires appropriate stack: Mocked E2E → component repo, full-stack E2E → downstream

Store the returned placement decisions in test_cases list (each TC dict includes placement_location, level, scores, reasons).

If any TCs are placed downstream or both, locate downstream repository:

1. Find the downstream repo:

   downstream_repo_path=$(cd $(git -C ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} rev-parse --show-toplevel) && uv run python scripts/repo.py find-target "opendatahub-io/opendatahub-tests")
   

2. If NOT found (exit code 1): Ask user to clone it:

   downstream_repo_path=$(cd $(git -C ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} rev-parse --show-toplevel) && uv run python scripts/repo.py clone "<downstream_url>" "~/Code/opendatahub-tests")
   

3. Set downstream_repo_path

Step 3: Select Test Cases to Implement

3.1 Parse --test-cases argument

If --test-cases was provided:

1. Parse comma-separated list (e.g., TC-API-001,TC-API-002,TC-E2E-001)
2. Validate each TC ID exists in test_cases/
3. If any TC ID not found, inform user and stop
4. Set selected_test_cases = [parsed TC IDs]
5. Set mode = "selective"

If --test-cases was NOT provided:

1. Read all TC IDs from test_cases/INDEX.md
2. Set selected_test_cases = [all TC IDs]
3. Set mode = "batch"

Present summary:

• If selective: Implementing <N> selected test case(s): <TC IDs>
• If batch: Implementing ALL test cases for feature: <feature_name>. Total: <N> test cases

Show counts by priority (P0/P1/P2) and by category.

Ask for confirmation via AskUserQuestion: Proceed? [yes/no]

3.2 Filter already-implemented test cases

Filter test cases by automation_status:

(cd $(git -C ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} rev-parse --show-toplevel) && uv run python scripts/filter_test_cases.py "$feature_dir" $selected_test_cases)

Returns JSON with to_implement and already_implemented arrays.

If already_implemented is not empty, ask via AskUserQuestion: Re-implement these? [yes/no]

Use to_implement list for subsequent steps.

3.3 Read and parse TC files

Parse all selected test cases into structured data:

(cd $(git -C ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} rev-parse --show-toplevel) && uv run python scripts/parse_test_cases.py "$feature_dir" $selected_test_cases)

Returns JSON array of TC dicts, each containing:

• All frontmatter fields (test_case_id, source_key, priority, status, automation_status, placement_location, level, etc.)
• Parsed content: objective, preconditions, test_steps, expected_results, body

Store the parsed TCs and add placement decisions from Step 2.2 to each TC dict.

This test_cases array will be passed to the sub-agent in Step 5.

Step 4: Map Test Cases to Test Files

CRITICAL: Call map_test_files.py script - do NOT manually create mappings or read existing test files.

Determine file organization strategy from conventions:

• If test_context shows subdirectories (unit/, api/, etc.) → by-category-with-subdirs
• Default → by-category (flat structure, one file per category)
• If unclear, ask user (by-category / one-per-tc)

Call the script to generate file mapping:

(cd $(git -C ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} rev-parse --show-toplevel) && uv run python scripts/map_test_files.py \
    "$feature_dir" "$org_pattern" "$test_dir" \
    --feature-name "$feature_name" \
    --tc-ids "$(echo $selected_test_cases | tr ' ' ',')")

Parse the JSON output to extract:

• file_mapping - Array of {file_path, test_cases[], function_names[]}
• strategy, total_test_cases, total_files

The script handles:

• Grouping TCs by category
• Generating file paths based on strategy
• Generating function names from TC titles
• Checking for existing test files

DO NOT manually create /tmp/*.json files, read existing test files, or generate file paths yourself. Use the script output directly.

Present the mapping table to user and ask for confirmation before proceeding to Step 5.

Step 5: Generate Test Code

CRITICAL: Invoke /test-plan-generate-test-file sub-agents in parallel (one per file) - do NOT generate code yourself.

Identify common setup requirements:

(cd $(git -C ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} rev-parse --show-toplevel) && uv run python scripts/analyze_common_setup.py "$feature_dir")

Returns JSON array of preconditions used by 2+ TCs (for fixture generation).

Ensure these variables are in context (sub-agents inherit them):

• file_mapping - Array from Step 4
• test_cases - Array from Step 3.3
• framework - From Step 1.1
• conventions_file - Path to conventions (from Step 1.2)
• pattern_guide - Content from Step 1.2b (or null)
• repo_instructions - Content from Step 1.2b (or null)
• common_setup_requirements - From analyze_common_setup.py above
• code_repo_path - Repository path
• feature_dir - Feature directory path

Invoke sub-agents in parallel using Agent tool (one per file in file_mapping):

For each file index i, build prompt with all needed data:

Agent(
  subagent_type="test-plan-generate-test-file",
  description="Generate test file {i}",
  prompt="""Generate test file from this data:

```json
{
  "file_index": {i},
  "file_path": "{file_mapping[i].file_path}",
  "test_cases": {json array of TCs for this file},
  "function_names": {file_mapping[i].function_names},
  "framework": "{framework}",
  "conventions_file": "{conventions_file}",
  "pattern_guide": "{pattern_guide or null}",
  "repo_instructions": "{repo_instructions or null}",
  "common_setup_requirements": {common_setup_requirements},
  "code_repo_path": "{code_repo_path}",
  "feature_dir": "{feature_dir}"
}

Write result to /tmp/test_plan_results/file_{i}.json Return: {{"status": "complete", "file_index": {i}, "result_file": "/tmp/test_plan_results/file_{i}.json"}}""" )

**All invocations in one message** for parallel execution. Sub-agents have `context: fork` (isolated, returns clean).

**Read result files** after all agents complete:

```bash
for i in $(seq 0 $((${#file_mapping[@]} - 1))); do
  result=$(cat /tmp/test_plan_results/file_${i}.json)
  # Parse: file_path, content, tc_ids, functions[], quality_summary, draft_files[], errors[]
done
rm -rf /tmp/test_plan_results/

Collect into files_to_write array. Proceed immediately to Step 6.

Step 6: Write Tests to Repositories

CRITICAL: Write the files from files_to_write array. Do NOT generate or modify test code - just write what the sub-agents returned.

6.1 Write test files

For each entry in files_to_write:

1. Create parent directories: mkdir -p <dirname>
2. Write file content
3. Run syntax check: python -m py_compile <file_path>
4. If syntax check fails, warn user but continue

6.2 Validate imports in repo context

For each written file:

1. Try importing in the target repo's Python environment:

   cd <target_repo_path>
   python -c "import sys; sys.path.insert(0, '.'); exec(open('<file_path>').read())"
   

2. If import fails, warn user with error message but do not block

6.3 Container validation (optional)

If validate_in_container == True:

1. Start container:

   podman run -d --name test-context-<repo_name>-validation \
     -v <target_repo_path>:/app:Z \
     -w /app \
     <validation_recipe.base_image> \
     sleep infinity
   

2. Install system dependencies:

   podman exec test-context-<repo_name>-validation bash -c \
     "apt-get update && apt-get install -y <system_deps>"
   

3. Run setup commands from validation_recipe.setup_commands

4. Run lint on generated files: Report lint results (pass/fail)

5. Run tests on generated files: For each generated test file, run pytest and report results

6. Cleanup container:

   podman rm -f test-context-<repo_name>-validation
   

Present validation summary to user.

Step 7: Update Test Case Frontmatter and Present Summary

Build updates array from sub-agent results (ONLY for successfully implemented TCs):

For each sub-agent result:

• For each entry in functions array (these scored 4+): Create update entry
• Skip TCs in draft_files (scored 0-3, need manual review)
• Skip TCs in errors (generation failed)

Update frontmatter in bulk:

# updates.json: [{"tc_id": "TC-API-001", "automation_status": "Implemented", "file": "...", "function": "..."}]
echo "$updates_json" | (cd $(git -C ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} rev-parse --show-toplevel) && uv run python scripts/update_tc_frontmatter.py "$feature_dir" -)

Returns JSON with updated_count, updated_tcs, errors. Show any errors to user.

If feature source is a GitHub branch, commit updated TC files:

git add <feature_dir>/test_cases/*.md
git commit -m "test-plan(<source_key>): mark TCs as implemented"
git push origin <branch_name>

7.2 Present Summary Report

Aggregate quality data from all sub-agent results:

• Sum quality_summary metrics (ready_count, good_count, revised_count, flagged_count)
• Collect all draft_files (TCs scored 0-3)
• Collect all errors (TCs that failed generation)

Display implementation summary:

• Feature name, source key, total TC count
• Successfully implemented: TC count, files created with TC mapping
• Test quality distribution (Ready/Good/Revised/Flagged)
• Draft files requiring manual review (if any): List TC IDs with scores and reasons
• Failed TCs (if any): List TC IDs with error messages
• Suggested fixtures (if common setup found)
• Next steps (review, run tests, create PR)

$ARGUMENTS