From nickcrew-claude-ctx-plugin
Proofreads written content for grammar, spelling, punctuation, style consistency, and tone errors before publishing emails, reports, essays, or blog posts.
npx claudepluginhub nickcrew/claude-cortexThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
This skill catches grammar errors, spelling mistakes, punctuation problems, inconsistent style, and tone mismatches in any written content—emails, reports, blog posts, essays, or marketing copy. It distinguishes between proofreading (surface-level errors) and copy editing (structural issues), applies common style guide rules, and flags commonly confused words. The output is a corrected version ...
Reviews written copy line-by-line against Every's style guide for grammar, punctuation, mechanics, formatting, and compliance. Ideal for articles, blogs, and docs.
Identifies grammar, logic, and flow errors in text and provides targeted revision suggestions without full rewrites. Use for proofreading content, docs, emails, marketing copy, or drafts.
Reviews and edits copy for grammar, style, and clarity using project style guides or defaults. For marketing copy, blog posts, documentation, emails, or business writing.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
This skill catches grammar errors, spelling mistakes, punctuation problems, inconsistent style, and tone mismatches in any written content—emails, reports, blog posts, essays, or marketing copy. It distinguishes between proofreading (surface-level errors) and copy editing (structural issues), applies common style guide rules, and flags commonly confused words. The output is a corrected version of the text with explanations of changes, or a marked-up list of issues depending on your preference.
| Task | Approach |
|---|---|
| Grammar | Check subject-verb agreement, tense consistency, dangling modifiers |
| Punctuation | Oxford comma, em dash usage, apostrophes, semicolons |
| Commonly confused | affect/effect, its/it's, their/there/they're, that/which, who/whom |
| Style consistency | Capitalization, hyphenation, number formatting, terminology |
| Tone check | Formal/casual match, second-person consistency, active/passive balance |
| Markup | Strikethrough deleted text, bold/bracket insertions |
Clarify the style guide and tone. Before proofreading, establish:
Read for meaning first, errors second. On the first pass, read the entire piece to understand what it's trying to say. This prevents "correcting" deliberate stylistic choices.
Check grammar systematically. Focus on:
Check punctuation.
Flag commonly confused words:
| Confused Pair | Rule |
|---|---|
| affect / effect | Affect = verb (to influence); Effect = noun (the result) |
| its / it's | its = possessive; it's = it is |
| their / there / they're | possessive / location / they are |
| that / which | "that" restricts (no comma); "which" adds info (comma before it) |
| who / whom | who = subject; whom = object |
| fewer / less | fewer = countable; less = uncountable |
| lay / lie | lay = to place something; lie = to recline |
| complement / compliment | complement = completes; compliment = praise |
| principal / principle | principal = main/head person; principle = rule/value |
| further / farther | farther = physical distance; further = metaphorical |
Check style consistency throughout the document:
Check tone and register.
Output format. Choose one:
Input: "The team have successfully completed the Q3 objectives, which was a significant achievement given the projects complexity. Going forward, we need to focus on improving our response times, their currently averaging 48 hours which effects customer satisfaction scores. Its important that each team member understand there role in achieving this target by years end."
Output:
Corrected Version: "The team has successfully completed the Q3 objectives, which was a significant achievement given the project's complexity. Going forward, we need to focus on improving our response times—they're currently averaging 48 hours, which affects customer satisfaction scores. It's important that each team member understands their role in achieving this target by year's end."
Changes Made:
Input: "Hi Marcus,
Thanks for meeting with myself and Sarah yesterday, we really enjoyed the conversation. Going forward I think theirs a real opportunity here for both our organizations. We would love to setup a more formal call to discuss the specifics of the proposal that was presented by you.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts, Jennifer"
Output:
Corrected Version: "Hi Marcus,
Thanks for meeting with Sarah and me yesterday—we really enjoyed the conversation. Going forward, I think there's a real opportunity here for both of our organizations. We'd love to set up a more formal call to discuss the specifics of your proposal.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts, Jennifer"
Changes Made: