Stats
Actions
Tags
Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From aura-frog
Structures complex analysis into sequential thoughts with revisions, branching, and dynamic adjustments. Use for architecture design, bug debugging, performance optimization, security review, and refactoring.
npx claudepluginhub nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog --plugin aura-frogHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/aura-frog:sequential-thinkingsonnetThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
**Use When:** Complex problems requiring structured analysis
Enables structured step-by-step reasoning with revision and branching for complex problems, multi-stage analysis, design planning, problem decomposition, unclear scope, or alternative approaches.
Structured chain-of-thought problem-solving methodology for complex, multi-step reasoning. Deprecated in favor of native adaptive thinking; retained for deterministic audit/review traces.
Runs extended sequential reasoning for deep analysis, complex decisions, and fresh perspectives on difficult problems.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Use When: Complex problems requiring structured analysis
thought_structure[5]{step,format,purpose}:
1,Initial analysis,Understand the problem space
2,Build on previous,Deepen understanding
3,[REVISION],Correct earlier assumptions
4,[BRANCH],Explore alternatives
5,[FINAL],Synthesize solution
Thought 1/N: [Initial analysis of the problem]
- Key observations
- Initial assumptions
Thought 2/N: [Building on Thought 1]
- Deeper analysis
- Connections discovered
Thought 3/N [REVISION of Thought 1]: [Corrected understanding]
- What was wrong
- Corrected view
Thought 4/N [BRANCH A]: [Alternative approach]
- Different angle
- Trade-offs
Thought 5/N [FINAL]: [Solution synthesis]
- Recommended approach
- Key decisions
adjustment[3]{action,when,how}:
Expand,Complexity increases,Add more thoughts (N+1)
Contract,Simpler than expected,Skip to FINAL
Branch,Multiple valid paths,Create BRANCH A/B/C
use_cases[5]{scenario,thoughts,model}:
Architecture design,5-8,opus
Bug root cause,3-5,sonnet
Performance optimization,4-6,sonnet
Security analysis,5-7,opus
Refactoring strategy,4-6,sonnet
phase_integration[4]{phase,use,focus}:
Phase 1,Requirements analysis,Understand scope and constraints
Phase 2,Technical planning,Evaluate approaches
Phase 3,Complex implementation,Debug tricky issues
Phase 4,Code review,Deep analysis of changes
User: "The login is slow but I don't know why"
Thought 1/4: [Initial analysis]
- Login involves: UI → API → Auth → DB
- "Slow" is vague - need metrics
- Possible bottlenecks: network, DB, auth provider
Thought 2/4: [Building on observations]
- Auth provider (external) is most likely
- DB queries should be fast (indexed)
- Network latency is user-dependent
Thought 3/4 [REVISION of Thought 2]: [After checking logs]
- Actually, DB query is taking 2.3s
- Missing index on users.email
- Auth provider is fine (50ms)
Thought 4/4 [FINAL]: [Solution]
- Add index: CREATE INDEX idx_users_email ON users(email)
- Expected improvement: 2.3s → 50ms
- Verify with EXPLAIN ANALYZE
Invoke: Use for problems requiring structured exploration before solution.