Applies systematic techniques to marketing challenges: simplification cascades for campaign complexity, collision-zone thinking for creative blocks, pattern recognition for recurring issues, and more.
From agentkits-marketingnpx claudepluginhub mikefefergrad-art/marketingThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
references/attribution.mdreferences/collision-zone-thinking.mdreferences/inversion-exercise.mdreferences/meta-pattern-recognition.mdreferences/scale-game.mdreferences/simplification-cascades.mdreferences/when-stuck.mdExecutes pre-written implementation plans: critically reviews, follows bite-sized steps exactly, runs verifications, tracks progress with checkpoints, uses git worktrees, stops on blockers.
Verifies tests pass on completed feature branch, presents options to merge locally, create GitHub PR, keep as-is or discard; executes choice and cleans up worktree.
Dispatches parallel agents to independently tackle 2+ tasks like separate test failures or subsystems without shared state or dependencies.
Systematic techniques for solving complex marketing challenges, breaking through creative blocks, and optimizing campaigns.
CRITICAL: Respond in the same language the user is using. If Vietnamese, respond in Vietnamese. If Spanish, respond in Spanish.
Standards: Token efficiency, sacrifice grammar for concision, list unresolved questions at end.
Apply problem-solving techniques when facing:
Problem: Campaign complexity spiraling out of control
When to use:
How it works:
Marketing example:
Problem: Product launch campaign across 8 channels, 15 assets, 4 segments
↓ Simplification Round 1
Focus: Top 3 channels (email, LinkedIn, blog), 6 core assets, 2 key segments
↓ Simplification Round 2
Core: Email + LinkedIn, 3 assets (landing page, case study, email sequence), 1 primary segment
Result: Focused execution, better results, manageable workload
See: ./references/simplification-cascades.md
Problem: Creative blocks, conventional approaches not working
When to use:
How it works:
Marketing example:
Challenge: B2B SaaS email campaign feels boring
Collision: "What if enterprise software marketing met sneaker drops?"
Insights: Scarcity, hype, exclusive access, community building
Application: Limited beta access campaign, waitlist with perks, exclusive Slack community
Result: 3x higher engagement, viral social sharing
See: ./references/collision-zone-thinking.md
Problem: Same issues recurring across campaigns
When to use:
How it works:
Marketing example:
Surface problems:
- Email campaign: Low open rates
- Social campaign: Low engagement
- Content campaign: Low traffic
Meta-pattern discovered: Weak audience understanding
Root cause: No buyer persona research or validation
Solution: Comprehensive persona development process
Prevention: Mandatory persona validation before any campaign
See: ./references/meta-pattern-recognition.md
Problem: Constrained by industry assumptions or "best practices"
When to use:
How it works:
Marketing example:
Assumption: "We must build email list before launching"
Inversion: "What if we launched with zero email list?"
Exploration: Focus on virality, referrals, paid acquisition, partnerships
Insight: Email list might be vanity metric; focus on product-led growth
Result: Skip content marketing, invest in product experience and referral program
See: ./references/inversion-exercise.md
Problem: Uncertain how strategy scales across audience sizes
When to use:
How it works:
Marketing example:
Current: 100 customers via founder-led sales
10x smaller (10 customers):
- Works: Personal outreach, custom demos, high-touch
- Breaks: Can't justify any paid marketing
10x larger (1,000 customers):
- Works: Content marketing, paid ads, self-service onboarding
- Breaks: Founder-led sales, custom demos
10x larger again (10,000 customers):
- Works: Product-led growth, brand awareness, partnerships
- Breaks: Content marketing bandwidth, ad costs unsustainable
Insight: At 100→1,000, invest in content + paid ads + self-service
Don't optimize for 10 or 10,000; build for 1,000
See: ./references/scale-game.md
Problem: Progress completely halted, don't know next step
When to use:
How it works:
Marketing example:
Stuck: Launching new product, paralyzed by marketing plan complexity
Zoom out: Goal = validate market demand + get 10 paying customers
Constraint: 1 day + $100 budget
- Can't build full funnel
- Can't create 50 assets
- Focus: Simple landing page + $100 LinkedIn ads
Naïve approach: "Just tell people about it"
- Direct outreach to 50 ideal customers
- Simple email explaining value
Ship smallest: Landing page + email to 50 prospects + $100 ads
Result: 3 sales in week 1, validated demand, iterate from there
See: ./references/when-stuck.md
Use problem-solving techniques at these key moments:
Planning Phase:
Execution Phase:
Optimization Phase:
Review Phase:
All techniques detailed in ./references/:
simplification-cascades.md - Reducing campaign complexitycollision-zone-thinking.md - Breaking creative blocksmeta-pattern-recognition.md - Finding root causesinversion-exercise.md - Challenging assumptionsscale-game.md - Planning for audience scalewhen-stuck.md - Unblocking progressattribution.md - Framework origins and creditsComplexity overwhelm? → Simplification Cascades (cut to 20% that matters) Creative stuck? → Collision-Zone Thinking (force unexpected combinations) Same problems repeating? → Meta-Pattern Recognition (find root cause) Best practices failing? → Inversion Exercise (try opposite approach) Scaling unclear? → Scale Game (test at 10x/0.1x scale) Completely blocked? → When Stuck Protocol (zoom out, constrain, ship smallest)
Remember: These techniques are tools, not rules. Mix and combine as needed. The goal is breakthrough thinking and unblocked execution, not perfect methodology.