Staged learning path for clarc — Day 1 survival commands, Week 1 workflow integration, Month 1 advanced agents. Includes solo, team, and role-specific paths.
From clarcnpx claudepluginhub marvinrichter/clarc --plugin clarcThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Designs and optimizes AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, observation formats, error recovery, and context for higher task completion rates.
Enables AI agents to execute x402 payments with per-task budgets, spending controls, and non-custodial wallets via MCP tools. Use when agents pay for APIs, services, or other agents.
Compares coding agents like Claude Code and Aider on custom YAML-defined codebase tasks using git worktrees, measuring pass rate, cost, time, and consistency.
Use this skill when:
Get value within the first 30 minutes. Learn exactly these commands in order:
| Command | Why first |
|---|---|
/quickstart | Interactive setup — installs the right rules for your stack |
/context | See which clarc components matter for your project |
/plan | Turn a feature request into a concrete plan |
/code-review | Immediate code quality feedback |
/tdd | Write your first feature the right way |
Day 1 goal: Complete one real task (a small feature or bug fix) using /plan → /tdd → /code-review in sequence.
Integrate clarc into your daily workflow. Add these:
| Command/Agent | When to use it |
|---|---|
/guide <task> | Any time you start a new task — get the right workflow |
/security-review | Before every PR that touches auth, APIs, or user data |
/e2e | For any feature with a critical user flow |
code-reviewer agent | After every significant code change (or use the nudge hook) |
/doctor | Weekly — verify clarc installation is healthy |
Week 1 goal: Run /guide <task> for every task this week. Notice which skills get recommended.
Unlock the full workflow OS. Add these:
| Component | When it pays off |
|---|---|
/orchestrate | Complex tasks needing 3+ independent analyses |
architect agent | Any architectural decision |
tdd-guide agent | For disciplined TDD on complex features |
/debt-audit | Monthly — identify where to invest refactoring time |
/instinct-report | See what clarc has learned about your codebase |
/skill-create | Extract patterns from your git history into skills |
Month 1 goal: Have a personal set of project-local instincts in ~/.clarc/instincts/.
Priority order:
/plan + /tdd + /code-review — your core loop/security-review — catch vulnerabilities before they reach production/guide <task> — get the right tool for every job/instinct-report — review what clarc has learned after 30 sessionsWhat to skip initially:
/team-sync (no team to sync with)Week 1 team setup:
/quickstart and commits .clarc/ config to the reponpx github:marvinrichter/clarc in the project root/onboard to generate CONTRIBUTING.md and setup scripts/setup-ci to wire clarc into the CI pipelineShared conventions to establish:
.clarc/hooks-config.json).clarc/skills/ for project-local skills/doctor health check (runs weekly)Team commands that matter:
| Command | Team value |
|---|---|
/code-review | Consistent review quality across all PRs |
/security-review | Security standards enforced on every PR |
/e2e | Shared E2E test suite that everyone runs |
/onboard | New hires set up independently in < 5 minutes |
/agent-stats | See which agents the team uses most |
Start with: /context → /e2e → /a11y-audit → /web-perf
Key skills: frontend-patterns, state-management, accessibility-patterns, e2e-testing
Example session — frontend developer, Day 1:
User: /context
clarc: Detected React + TypeScript project. Relevant skills: frontend-patterns, state-management, e2e-testing.
User: /e2e add checkout flow test
clarc: [e2e-runner] Generated Playwright test: checkout-flow.spec.ts — 3 critical paths covered.
User: /a11y-audit
clarc: [design-system-reviewer] Found 2 issues: missing aria-label on cart button, colour contrast ratio 3.2:1 (min 4.5:1).
User: /web-perf
clarc: [performance-analyst] LCP 3.8s (target <2.5s) — ProductImage not lazy-loaded. Fix: add loading="lazy".
Start with: /context → /tdd → /database-review → /security-review
Key skills: api-design, auth-patterns, database-migrations, observability
Start with: /context → /iac-review → /gitops-review → /finops-audit
Key skills: kubernetes-patterns, terraform-patterns, gitops-patterns, observability
Start with: /plan → /explore → /arc42 → /debt-audit
Key agents: architect, planner, modernization-planner
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
Using /help instead of /guide <task> | /guide gives you a workflow, /help gives you a list |
Running /code-review on every line | Use the code-review-nudge hook — it suggests automatically |
| Ignoring the TDD guard nudge | The nudge fires for a reason — write the test first |
| Not reading the suggested skill | Skills contain the patterns Claude will use — read them |
Using /orchestrate for simple tasks | Reserve it for tasks needing 3+ independent analyses |
New task? → /guide <task description>
New project? → /context
Implementing? → /plan → /tdd → /code-review
Before PR? → /security + /code-review
Architecture? → /explore → /arc42
Build broken? → say "fix the build" (build-error-resolver auto-triggers)
Performance issue? → /profile
Stuck? → /clarc-way
A new developer joining a Python/FastAPI project:
# Day 1 — first 30 minutes
User: /quickstart
clarc: Detected Python project (FastAPI). Installing rules/python/ and core skills.
Nudge hooks enabled. Run `/context` next to see what matters for this codebase.
User: /context
clarc: Found 3 relevant skills for this project:
- fastapi-patterns (FastAPI routing, dependency injection, Pydantic v2)
- python-patterns (PEP 8, type hints, dataclasses)
- postgres-patterns (async SQLAlchemy, migrations)
Run /plan before implementing, /tdd to write tests first.
User: /plan add user authentication with JWT
clarc: [planner agent] Breaking down: JWT token generation, login endpoint,
dependency for protected routes, refresh token flow...
Task list created in TODO.md.
User: /tdd implement the login endpoint
clarc: [tdd-guide agent] Writing test first:
test_login_returns_jwt_on_valid_credentials
test_login_returns_401_on_wrong_password
RED: tests fail. Now implement login_router.py...
User: /code-review
clarc: [python-reviewer agent] Found 2 issues:
HIGH: Password compared without constant-time comparison (timing attack)
MEDIUM: JWT secret read directly from os.environ — use pydantic Settings instead.
What happened: 30 minutes, one real feature shipped, two security issues caught before PR.