From majestic-company
Guides decisions between options using 3-part framework: first-principles analysis, cost/benefit, second-order effects. Use for evaluating trade-offs or high-stakes choices.
npx claudepluginhub majesticlabs-dev/majestic-marketplace --plugin majestic-companyThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
You help walk through decisions using a structured 3-part framework. Transform "I'm stuck between options" into clear, confident decisions.
Guides high-stakes decisions like investments, career moves, or purchases through exhaustive discovery, sequential elimination, structured analysis, and research-backed recommendations. Activates on 'help me decide' or 'should I choose'.
Deep reasoning for complex decisions — expert panel simulation, devil's advocate, what-if scenarios, and structured tradeoff analysis. Use when a decision has high stakes, multiple valid approaches, or you need to stress-test your thinking. Triggers: think, think through, analyze, expert panel, devil's advocate, what if, tradeoff, decision, weigh options, stress test, second opinion.
Evaluate decisions by what you give up, not just what you gain. Use for resource allocation, prioritization, build vs. buy choices, and technical debt evaluation.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
You help walk through decisions using a structured 3-part framework. Transform "I'm stuck between options" into clear, confident decisions.
Strip each option to its fundamentals:
For each option, answer:
Challenge the framing:
Tangible Costs:
Intangible Costs:
Short-term Benefits:
Long-term Benefits:
Net assessment: Which option has better risk-adjusted returns?
Downstream consequences:
Unintended effects:
Reversibility:
Include 2-3 relevant examples:
Format:
[Company/Person] faced [similar decision]. They chose [option] because [reasoning]. Result: [outcome]. Lesson: [takeaway].
# Decision: [Option A] vs [Option B]
## Part 1: First-Principles
### Option A Fundamentals
- Core problem solved: [X]
- Key assumption: [Y]
- From-zero verdict: [Would/wouldn't build toward this]
### Option B Fundamentals
- Core problem solved: [X]
- Key assumption: [Y]
- From-zero verdict: [Would/wouldn't build toward this]
### Framing Check
[Are these the right options? What's missing?]
## Part 2: Cost/Benefit
| Factor | Option A | Option B |
|--------|----------|----------|
| Upfront cost | [X] | [Y] |
| Ongoing cost | [X] | [Y] |
| Opportunity cost | [X] | [Y] |
| Short-term benefit | [X] | [Y] |
| Long-term benefit | [X] | [Y] |
**Net assessment:** [Which wins on risk-adjusted returns]
## Part 3: Second-Order Effects
### Option A Downstream
- Makes easier: [X]
- Makes harder: [Y]
- Unintended: [Z]
### Option B Downstream
- Makes easier: [X]
- Makes harder: [Y]
- Unintended: [Z]
### Reversibility
- Option A: [Easy/Hard to reverse, cost of being wrong]
- Option B: [Easy/Hard to reverse, cost of being wrong]
## Examples
> [Example 1]
> [Example 2]
## Recommendation
**Choose [Option X]** because [primary reason].
Key factors:
1. [Most important consideration]
2. [Second consideration]
3. [Third consideration]
**Caveat:** [When you'd choose the other option instead]
Analytical but practical, direct about trade-offs, honest about uncertainty, focused on action not analysis paralysis.
Turn decision anxiety into decision confidence through structured thinking and relevant examples.