From thinking-frameworks-skills
Validates symmetry hypotheses in data/models via invariance/equivariance tests, group structure verification, and transform distribution analysis before equivariant architectures.
npx claudepluginhub lyndonkl/claude --plugin thinking-frameworks-skillsThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Wrong symmetry assumptions hurt model performance -- too much symmetry over-constrains, while missing symmetry wastes capacity. Validate before committing to equivariant architecture.
Generates design tokens/docs from CSS/Tailwind/styled-components codebases, audits visual consistency across 10 dimensions, detects AI slop in UI.
Records polished WebM UI demo videos of web apps using Playwright with cursor overlay, natural pacing, and three-phase scripting. Activates for demo, walkthrough, screen recording, or tutorial requests.
Delivers idiomatic Kotlin patterns for null safety, immutability, sealed classes, coroutines, Flows, extensions, DSL builders, and Gradle DSL. Use when writing, reviewing, refactoring, or designing Kotlin code.
Wrong symmetry assumptions hurt model performance -- too much symmetry over-constrains, while missing symmetry wastes capacity. Validate before committing to equivariant architecture.
Copy this checklist and track your progress:
Symmetry Validation Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: List symmetry hypotheses to test
- [ ] Step 2: Design transformation test sets
- [ ] Step 3: Run invariance/equivariance tests
- [ ] Step 4: Verify group structure
- [ ] Step 5: Analyze data distribution under transforms
- [ ] Step 6: Document validation results
Step 1: List symmetry hypotheses to test
Gather candidate symmetries from previous discovery work. For each, document: the transformation type, whether invariance or equivariance is expected, and confidence level. Prioritize testing low-confidence hypotheses. If no hypotheses exist, work with user through domain analysis to identify candidate symmetries first.
Step 2: Design transformation test sets
For each symmetry, create test protocol: Sample representative inputs from data distribution. Define transformation sampling strategy (random rotations, all permutations, etc.). Determine appropriate sample sizes for statistical significance. Consider edge cases and boundary conditions. See Transformation Sampling for guidance. For detailed methodology, consult Methodology Details.
Step 3: Run invariance/equivariance tests
For invariance testing: Apply transformation T to input x, compute outputs f(x) and f(T(x)), measure error ||f(T(x)) - f(x)||. For equivariance testing: Compute f(T(x)) and T'(f(x)) where T' is the output transformation, measure error ||f(T(x)) - T'(f(x))||. Use Testing Protocols for implementation details. Aggregate across samples and compute statistics. For complete code examples, see Test Implementation Examples.
Step 4: Verify group structure
Check that claimed transformations form a valid group: Test closure (composition of two transforms is a transform). Test associativity. Verify identity element exists. Verify inverses exist. For Lie groups, check that generators close under commutator. See Group Structure Tests.
Step 5: Analyze data distribution under transforms
Check if transformed data stays in-distribution: Apply transforms to training data. Compare statistics of original vs transformed data. Check for distributional shift that might break assumptions. Identify transformation ranges that maintain validity. This catches "approximate symmetry" cases where symmetry holds only within bounds.
Step 6: Document validation results
Create validation report using Output Template. For each symmetry: state hypothesis, test methodology, quantitative results, pass/fail decision. Recommend whether to use hard equivariance constraint, soft constraint (regularization), data augmentation, or no symmetry at all. Quality criteria for this output are defined in Quality Rubric.
def test_invariance(model, data_samples, transform_fn, n_transforms=100):
"""
Test if model output is invariant to transformations.
Returns:
mean_error: Average ||f(T(x)) - f(x)||
max_error: Maximum error observed
pass_rate: Fraction with error < threshold
"""
errors = []
for x in data_samples:
y_orig = model(x)
for _ in range(n_transforms):
x_transformed = transform_fn(x)
y_transformed = model(x_transformed)
error = norm(y_transformed - y_orig)
errors.append(error)
return {
'mean_error': mean(errors),
'max_error': max(errors),
'std_error': std(errors),
'pass_rate': sum(e < threshold for e in errors) / len(errors)
}
def test_equivariance(model, data_samples, input_transform, output_transform):
"""
Test if f(T(x)) = T'(f(x)) for equivariance.
Returns:
mean_error: Average ||f(T(x)) - T'(f(x))||
relative_error: Error normalized by output magnitude
"""
errors = []
for x in data_samples:
# Method 1: Transform then model
x_T = input_transform(x)
y1 = model(x_T)
# Method 2: Model then transform
y = model(x)
y2 = output_transform(y)
error = norm(y1 - y2)
relative = error / (norm(y2) + eps)
errors.append({'absolute': error, 'relative': relative})
return aggregate_stats(errors)
For reliable results:
| Group | Sampling Strategy |
|---|---|
| SO(2) | Uniform random angles θ ∈ [0, 2π) |
| SO(3) | Uniform random quaternions or axis-angle |
| SE(3) | Combine SO(3) rotation + uniform translation |
| Translations | Uniform within expected data range |
| Group | Sampling Strategy |
|---|---|
| Cₙ | All n rotations |
| Dₙ | All 2n elements (rotations + reflections) |
| Sₙ | Random permutations (full enumeration if n ≤ 6) |
For random g₁, g₂ ∈ G:
Compute g₃ = g₁ · g₂
Verify g₃ ∈ G (within numerical tolerance)
For random g₁, g₂, g₃ ∈ G:
Compute (g₁ · g₂) · g₃
Compute g₁ · (g₂ · g₃)
Verify equality (within tolerance)
For random g ∈ G:
Verify g · e = e · g = g
Find g⁻¹ and verify g · g⁻¹ = e
| Error Level | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| < 1e-6 | Exact symmetry (numerical precision) |
| 1e-6 to 1e-3 | Strong approximate symmetry |
| 1e-3 to 0.01 | Weak approximate symmetry |
| > 0.01 | Symmetry likely doesn't hold |
| Validation Result | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Exact symmetry confirmed | Use hard equivariant constraint |
| Strong approximate | Use equivariant architecture |
| Weak approximate | Consider soft constraint or augmentation |
| Symmetry broken | Don't enforce this symmetry |
| Partial symmetry | Use conditional/local equivariance |
SYMMETRY VALIDATION REPORT
==========================
Tested Symmetries:
1. [Transformation]: [Invariance/Equivariance]
- Sample size: [N samples × M transforms]
- Mean error: [value]
- Max error: [value]
- Pass rate: [%] at threshold [value]
- RESULT: [PASS/FAIL/PARTIAL]
- Recommendation: [Hard constraint/Soft/Augmentation/None]
2. [Transformation]: [Invariance/Equivariance]
...
Group Structure:
- Closure: [PASS/FAIL]
- Associativity: [PASS/FAIL]
- Identity/Inverse: [PASS/FAIL]
Distribution Analysis:
- Transform range where symmetry holds: [bounds]
- Detected breaking factors: [list]
SUMMARY:
- Confirmed symmetries: [list]
- Rejected symmetries: [list]
- Proceed to architecture design with: [group specification]