From thinking-frameworks-skills
Establishes stakeholder alignment using RACI/DACI/RAPID decision matrices, working agreements, and conflict resolution protocols for resolving governance ambiguities and team conflicts.
npx claudepluginhub lyndonkl/claude --plugin thinking-frameworks-skillsThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Copy this checklist and track your progress:
Generates design tokens/docs from CSS/Tailwind/styled-components codebases, audits visual consistency across 10 dimensions, detects AI slop in UI.
Records polished WebM UI demo videos of web apps using Playwright with cursor overlay, natural pacing, and three-phase scripting. Activates for demo, walkthrough, screen recording, or tutorial requests.
Delivers idiomatic Kotlin patterns for null safety, immutability, sealed classes, coroutines, Flows, extensions, DSL builders, and Gradle DSL. Use when writing, reviewing, refactoring, or designing Kotlin code.
Copy this checklist and track your progress:
Negotiation Alignment Governance Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Map stakeholders and tensions
- [ ] Step 2: Choose governance approach
- [ ] Step 3: Facilitate alignment
- [ ] Step 4: Document agreements
- [ ] Step 5: Establish monitoring
Step 1: Map stakeholders and tensions
Identify all stakeholders, their interests and concerns, current tensions or conflicts, and decision points needing clarity. See Common Patterns for typical stakeholder configurations.
Step 2: Choose governance approach
For straightforward cases with clear stakeholders → Use resources/template.md for RACI/DACI and working agreement structures. For complex cases with multiple conflicts or nested decisions → Study resources/methodology.md for negotiation techniques, conflict mediation, and advanced governance patterns.
Step 3: Facilitate alignment
Create negotiation-alignment-governance.md with: stakeholder map, decision rights matrix (RACI/DACI/RAPID), working agreements (communication, quality, processes), conflict resolution protocols, and escalation paths. Facilitate structured dialogue to negotiate and reach consensus. See resources/methodology.md for facilitation techniques.
Step 4: Document agreements
Self-assess using resources/evaluators/rubric_negotiation_alignment_governance.json. Check: decision rights are unambiguous, all key stakeholders covered, agreements are specific and actionable, conflict protocols are clear, escalation paths defined. Minimum standard: Average score ≥ 3.5.
Step 5: Establish monitoring
Set up regular reviews of governance effectiveness (quarterly), define triggers for updating agreements, establish metrics for decision velocity and conflict resolution, and create feedback mechanisms for stakeholders.
RACI (Most Common):
DACI (Better for Decisions):
RAPID (Best for Complex Decisions):
Advice Process (Distributed Authority):
Product vs Engineering:
Business vs Legal/Compliance:
Centralized vs Decentralized Teams:
Communication Norms:
Decision-Making Norms:
Conflict Resolution Norms:
Decision Rights:
Working Agreements:
Conflict Resolution:
Facilitation:
Red Flags:
Resources:
resources/template.md - RACI/DACI/RAPID templates, working agreement structures, conflict resolution protocolsresources/methodology.md - Negotiation techniques (principled negotiation, BATNA analysis), conflict mediation, facilitation patterns, governance design for complex scenariosresources/evaluators/rubric_negotiation_alignment_governance.json - Quality criteriaOutput: negotiation-alignment-governance.md with stakeholder map, decision rights matrix, working agreements, conflict protocols, escalation paths
Success Criteria:
Quick Decisions:
Common Mistakes:
Key Insight: Explicit governance reduces coordination costs over time. Initial investment in alignment pays dividends through faster decisions, less rework, and lower conflict.