bee:pre-dev-dependency-map

Dependency Map - Explicit Technology Choices

Foundational Principle

Every technology choice must be explicit, versioned, validated against Bee Standards, and justified.

Using vague or "latest" dependencies creates:

• Unreproducible builds across environments
• Hidden incompatibilities discovered during implementation
• Security vulnerabilities from unvetted versions

The Dependency Map answers: WHAT specific products, versions, packages, and infrastructure we'll use. The Dependency Map never answers: HOW to implement features (that's Tasks/Subtasks).

---

⛔ HARD BLOCK: Standards Loading (Step 0)

This is a HARD GATE. Do NOT proceed without loading Bee Standards and TRD decisions.

Step 0.1: Read Technology Decisions from TRD

Read docs/pre-dev/{feature-name}/trd.md and extract: deployment.model, tech_stack.primary, project_technologies[]

If TRD metadata missing: BLOCKER → Go back to TRD (Gate 3) and complete Step 0.4

Step 0.2: Load Bee Standards via WebFetch

Standard	URL	Purpose
typescript.md	https://raw.githubusercontent.com/luanrodrigues/ia-frmwrk/master/dev-team/docs/standards/typescript.md	TypeScript patterns
frontend.md	https://raw.githubusercontent.com/luanrodrigues/ia-frmwrk/master/dev-team/docs/standards/frontend.md	Frontend patterns
sre.md	https://raw.githubusercontent.com/luanrodrigues/ia-frmwrk/master/dev-team/docs/standards/sre.md	Observability, logging

Bee Standards = coding patterns, observability, logging, error handling (shared across ALL projects) PROJECT_RULES.md = specific technologies, versions, database choices (specific to THIS project)

Step 0.3: Generate PROJECT_RULES.md (OUTPUT)

Using TRD project_technologies[], create docs/PROJECT_RULES.md with: deployment model, tech stack, per-category decisions (PRD requirement, technology, version, rationale, cloud service, on-premise alternative), version matrix, security/compliance.

Pressure Resistance for Step 0

Pressure	Response
"TRD doesn't have technology decisions"	"Go back to TRD (Gate 3) and complete Step 0.4 (PRD analysis)."
"Bee Standards are optional"	"Bee Standards define coding patterns. PROJECT_RULES.md defines technologies. Both needed."
"Just use defaults"	"Defaults come from PRD analysis in TRD. Read TRD first."
"Skip to save time"	"PROJECT_RULES.md is the output. Cannot skip the output."

---

Mandatory Workflow

Phase	Activities
1. Evaluation	Bee Standards loaded (Step 0); PROJECT_RULES.md loaded; Data Model (Gate 5), API Design (Gate 4), TRD (Gate 3) passed; map TRD components to tech candidates; validate against Bee Standards; map Data Model to storage; map API contracts to protocols; check team expertise; estimate costs
2. Selection	Per technology: check Bee Standards (mandatory/prohibited), check PROJECT_RULES.md overrides, specify exact version, list alternatives with trade-offs, verify compatibility, check security (CVEs), validate licenses, calculate costs
3. Gate 6 Validation	All dependencies explicit, no conflicts, no critical CVEs, licenses compliant, team expertise, costs documented, all components mapped

Explicit Rules

✅ DO Include

Exact package names with versions (laravel/framework@^11.0), tech stack with constraints (PHP 8.3+, PostgreSQL 16), infrastructure specs (Valkey 8, MinIO), external SDKs, dev tools, security deps, monitoring tools, compatibility matrices, license summary, cost analysis

❌ NEVER Include

Implementation code, how to use dependencies, task breakdowns, setup instructions, architectural patterns (TRD), business requirements (PRD)

Version Rules

1. Explicit: @v1.27.0 not @latest or ^1.0.0
2. Justified ranges: If using >=, document why
3. Lock file referenced: composer.lock, package-lock.json, etc.
4. Upgrade constraints: Document why locked/capped
5. Compatibility: Document known conflicts

Rationalization Table

Excuse	Reality
"Latest version is always best"	Latest is untested in your context. Pick specific, validate.
"I'll use flexible version ranges"	Ranges cause non-reproducible builds. Lock versions.
"Version numbers don't matter much"	They matter critically. Specify or face build failures.
"We can update versions later"	Document constraints now. Future you needs context.
"The team knows the stack already"	Document it anyway. Teams change, memories fade.
"Security scanning can happen in CI"	Security analysis must happen before committing. Do it now.
"We'll figure out costs in production"	Costs must be estimated before building. Calculate now.
"Compatibility issues will surface in tests"	Validate compatibility NOW. Don't wait for failures.
"License compliance is legal's problem"	You're responsible for your dependencies. Check licenses.
"I'll just use what the project template has"	Templates may be outdated/insecure. Validate explicitly.

Red Flags - STOP

If you catch yourself writing any of these in a Dependency Map, STOP:

• Version placeholders: @latest, @next, ^X.Y.Z without justification
• Vague descriptions: "latest stable", "current version", "newest"
• Missing version numbers: Just package names without versions
• Unchecked compatibility: Not verifying version conflicts
• Unvetted security: Not checking vulnerability databases
• Unknown licenses: Not documenting license types
• Estimated costs as "TBD" or "unknown"
• "We'll use whatever is default" (no default without analysis)

When you catch yourself: Stop and specify the exact version after proper analysis.

Gate 6 Validation Checklist

Category	Requirements
Standards Compliance (HARD BLOCK)	Bee Standards loaded; PROJECT_RULES.md loaded; mandatory deps included (or justified); no prohibited choices (or justified); version constraints respected; deviations documented
Compatibility	All deps have explicit versions; version matrix complete; no known conflicts; runtime requirements specified; upgrade path documented
Security	All deps scanned for vulnerabilities; no critical (9.0+) or high (7.0-8.9) CVEs; security update policy documented; supply chain verified
Feasibility	Team has expertise or learning path; tools available; licensing allows commercial use; costs fit budget
Completeness	Every TRD component mapped; dev environment specified; CI/CD deps documented; monitoring stack complete
Documentation	License summary; cost analysis; known constraints; alternatives with rationale

Gate Result: ✅ PASS (all checked) → Task Breakdown | ⚠️ CONDITIONAL (standards not loaded) → Complete Step 0 | ❌ FAIL (critical CVEs, incompatibilities, standards not loaded)

Common Violations

Violation	Wrong	Correct
Vague Versions	laravel/framework (latest), PostgreSQL (current), monolog (newest stable)	laravel/framework@^11.0 with purpose, alternatives considered, trade-offs; doctrine/dbal@^3.6 with constraint; monolog/monolog@^3.5 with rationale
Missing Security	JWT Library: firebase/php-jwt@^6.0 (no analysis)	Package + purpose + security (CVE check date, OWASP compliance, update history) + alternatives
Undefined Infrastructure	Some database (probably Postgres), Cache (Redis or Valkey), Storage for files	Per component: product + version + rationale + configuration + cost (managed vs self-hosted)

Dependency Resolution Patterns

Standards-Driven Validation

If language cannot be auto-detected, use AskUserQuestion with tech stack options (PHP Backend, TypeScript Backend, TypeScript Frontend, Full-Stack TypeScript).

Selection	Standards to Load
TypeScript Backend	typescript.md + sre.md
TypeScript Frontend	frontend.md
Full-Stack TypeScript	typescript.md + frontend.md + sre.md

Validation Flow: Standards loaded → Extract mandatory/prohibited/constraints → Check PROJECT_RULES.md → Validate each selection → Document compliance or justified deviations

Best Practices

Prefer: Semantic versioned packages, well-maintained (commits within 6 months), minimal dependency trees, standard library when sufficient Avoid: Deprecated packages (>1 year unmaintained), single-maintainer critical deps, >100 transitive deps, GPL unless compliance certain

Authentication Dependencies (Mandatory for Auth Features)

If TRD specifies authentication/authorization requirements, include these dependencies:

Authentication dependencies are defined per tech stack in the appropriate language standards.

Implementation Requirement (from TRD):

• Every protected endpoint MUST have route middleware for authorization
• Middleware is applied per-route, not globally
• See the appropriate language standards for implementation patterns

Licensing Dependencies (Mandatory for Licensed Products)

If TRD specifies this is a licensed product/plugin, include these dependencies:

Licensing dependencies are defined per tech stack in the appropriate language standards.

Implementation Requirement (from TRD):

• License middleware applied globally, early in the chain
• Graceful shutdown MUST include license manager cleanup
• See the appropriate language standards for implementation patterns

License & Cost Templates

License Summary: Document count by type (MIT, Apache 2.0, BSD-3-Clause, Commercial), compliance actions (attribution file, legal notification, GPL verification)

Cost Analysis: Monthly breakdown by category (Compute: containers × cost, Storage: managed DB + cache + object, Network: transfer + load balancer, Third-Party: auth + email + monitoring), grand total, scaling cost per additional users, budget validation

Confidence Scoring

Factor	Points	Criteria
Technology Familiarity	0-30	Used before: 30, Similar: 20, Novel: 10
Compatibility Verification	0-25	All verified: 25, Most checked: 15, Limited: 5
Security Assessment	0-25	Full CVE scan: 25, Basic check: 15, No review: 5
Cost Analysis	0-20	Detailed breakdown: 20, Rough estimates: 12, None: 5

Action: 80+ autonomous generation | 50-79 present alternatives | <50 ask about expertise/constraints

Output & After Approval

Output to: docs/pre-dev/{feature-name}/dependency-map.md

1. ✅ Lock all versions - update only with documented justification
2. 🎯 Create lock files (composer.lock, package-lock.json, etc.)
3. 🔒 Set up Dependabot or equivalent for security updates
4. 📋 Proceed to task breakdown with full stack context

The Bottom Line

If you skipped loading Bee Standards, STOP and go back to Step 0.

If you wrote a Dependency Map without explicit versions, add them now or start over.

Two non-negotiable requirements:

1. Bee Standards MUST be loaded - Technology choices validated against organizational baseline
2. Every dependency MUST be explicit - No @latest, no vague versions, no "we'll figure it out"

Load standards first. Be explicit. Be specific. Lock your versions.

---

Blocker Criteria - STOP and Report

Condition	Action	Severity
Data Model (Gate 5) not validated	STOP and complete Gate 5 first	CRITICAL
Bee Standards not loaded via WebFetch	STOP and load required standards	CRITICAL
TRD metadata missing technology decisions	STOP and complete TRD Step 0.4	CRITICAL
Version uses @latest or vague range	STOP and specify exact version	HIGH
Critical CVE (9.0+) found in dependency	STOP and find alternative or document risk	CRITICAL
License incompatible with commercial use	STOP and find compliant alternative	HIGH

---

Cannot Be Overridden

These requirements are NON-NEGOTIABLE:

• MUST complete Step 0 (Standards Loading) before selecting technologies
• MUST NOT use @latest, @next, or vague version ranges
• MUST specify exact versions for ALL dependencies
• MUST scan for CVEs before finalizing selections
• MUST verify license compatibility for commercial use
• MUST include appropriate auth libraries for services requiring authentication
• MUST include appropriate license libraries for services requiring licensing
• CANNOT proceed to Gate 7 with missing versions or unresolved CVEs

---

Severity Calibration

Severity	Definition	Example
CRITICAL	Cannot proceed with dependency selection	Standards not loaded, critical CVE found
HIGH	Dependency violates explicitness rules	@latest used, license unclear
MEDIUM	Dependency incomplete but acceptable	Missing alternative documentation
LOW	Minor documentation gaps	Cost analysis could be more detailed

---

Pressure Resistance

User Says	Your Response
"Latest version is always best"	"Cannot use @latest. Latest is untested in this context. I'll specify exact version after validation."
"Flexible version ranges are fine"	"Cannot use ranges. Ranges cause non-reproducible builds. I'll lock to specific versions."
"Security scanning can happen in CI"	"Cannot defer security. CVE analysis must happen before committing. I'll scan now."
"Skip Bee Standards, we know our stack"	"Cannot skip standards. Standards validate against organizational baseline. I'll load them first."
"License compliance is legal's problem"	"Cannot ignore licenses. You're responsible for your dependencies. I'll verify now."

---

When This Skill Is Not Needed

• Small Track workflow (skip to Task Breakdown)
• Technologies already locked and validated
• Data Model (Gate 5) not validated → complete Gate 5 first
• Dependency Map already exists and versions are current
• No new technology decisions needed for this feature