From bee-default
Evidence-first completion gate - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims.
npx claudepluginhub luanrodrigues/ia-frmwrk --plugin bee-defaultThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.
Generates design tokens/docs from CSS/Tailwind/styled-components codebases, audits visual consistency across 10 dimensions, detects AI slop in UI.
Records polished WebM UI demo videos of web apps using Playwright with cursor overlay, natural pacing, and three-phase scripting. Activates for demo, walkthrough, screen recording, or tutorial requests.
Delivers idiomatic Kotlin patterns for null safety, immutability, sealed classes, coroutines, Flows, extensions, DSL builders, and Gradle DSL. Use when writing, reviewing, refactoring, or designing Kotlin code.
Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.
Core principle: Evidence before claims, always.
Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- If NO: State actual status with evidence
- If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
Skip any step = lying, not verifying
EVERY completion message structure:
Example structure:
Let me verify the implementation:
$ npm test
[PASTE FULL OUTPUT]
The tests show 15/15 passing. Implementation is complete.
Wrong structure (violation):
Implementation is complete! Let me verify:
[This is backwards - claimed before verifying]
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
|---|---|---|
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
NEVER use these without evidence:
Using these = lying, not verifying
About to say "all tests pass"?
Check:
No to any = you're lying
"I ran them earlier" = NOT verification "They should pass now" = NOT verification "The previous output showed" = NOT verification
Run. Paste. Then claim.
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
| "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
| Type | ✅ CORRECT | ❌ WRONG |
|---|---|---|
| Tests | Run command, see "34/34 pass", then claim | "Should pass now" |
| Regression (TDD) | Write → pass → revert → MUST FAIL → restore → pass | "Written regression test" (no red-green) |
| Build | Run build, see exit 0, then claim | "Linter passed" (linter ≠ compiler) |
| Requirements | Re-read plan → checklist → verify each | "Tests pass, phase complete" |
| Agent delegation | Check VCS diff → verify changes | Trust agent report |
This skill uses these universal patterns:
skills/shared-patterns/state-tracking.mdskills/shared-patterns/failure-recovery.mdskills/shared-patterns/exit-criteria.mdskills/shared-patterns/todowrite-integration.mdApply ALL patterns when using this skill.
| Violation | Detection | Recovery |
|---|---|---|
| Claimed complete without verification | "complete" with no command output, "should work" | Run verification → paste output → then claim |
| Ran command but didn't paste | Mentioned running tests, no output shown | Re-run → copy FULL output → paste → then claim |
| Used banned phrases | "appears to work", "Great!", "Done!" before evidence | Stop → run verification → paste output → evidence-based claim |
Why recovery matters: Claims without evidence = false confidence. Silent failures go undetected until production.
From 24 failure memories:
ALWAYS before:
Rule applies to:
STOP and report if:
| Decision Type | Blocker Condition | Required Action |
|---|---|---|
| No verification command identified | Cannot determine what command proves the claim | STOP and identify verification command first |
| Verification command fails to run | Command errors, times out, or is unavailable | STOP and report infrastructure issue |
| Verification output contradicts claim | Tests fail but claiming success | STOP and state actual status with evidence |
| Banned phrase detected | About to use "should work", "appears to", etc. | STOP and run verification before continuing |
| Evidence is stale | Verification was from previous message or session | STOP and re-run verification fresh |
The following requirements CANNOT be waived:
| Severity | Condition | Required Action |
|---|---|---|
| CRITICAL | Claimed complete without any verification | MUST immediately run verification and correct claim |
| CRITICAL | Used banned phrase with no evidence | MUST run verification and restate with evidence |
| HIGH | Verification from previous message used for current claim | MUST re-run verification fresh |
| HIGH | Partial verification used (linter for build, etc.) | MUST run correct verification command |
| MEDIUM | Output pasted but incomplete | Should re-run and paste full output |
| LOW | Claim made then verified (wrong order) | Restate with verification first in future |
| Rationalization | Why It's WRONG | Required Action |
|---|---|---|
| "I ran it earlier, it passed" | Stale evidence is not evidence. Code may have changed. | MUST run verification fresh THIS message |
| "It should work now after my change" | Prediction is not verification | MUST execute command and paste output |
| "I'm confident the tests pass" | Confidence without evidence is lying | MUST run tests and show actual output |
| "Previous output showed success" | Each claim needs fresh verification | MUST re-run command for each claim |
| "The linter passed so build works" | Linter ≠ compiler ≠ tests | MUST run the specific verification for each claim |
| "Agent reported success" | Agent reports MUST be independently verified | MUST check VCS diff and run verification |
| "Just this once, I'll skip it" | No exceptions. Every claim needs evidence. | MUST verify before ANY completion claim |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing. Silent failures remain hidden. | MUST run FULL verification command |
| User Says | Your Response |
|---|---|
| "Just say it's done, we're in a hurry" | "CANNOT claim completion without verification - false claims waste more time" |
| "I trust you, no need to verify" | "Verification is non-negotiable - I MUST show evidence before claiming success" |
| "The tests probably pass, move on" | "MUST run tests and paste output before claiming they pass" |
| "Skip verification, commit now" | "CANNOT commit without verification - will run commands first" |
No shortcuts for verification.
Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.
This is non-negotiable.