Build business cases, ROI analyses, and financial models for consulting recommendations — cost-benefit analysis, NPV/IRR calculations, sensitivity analysis, scenario modeling, and investment justification. Use whenever business case, ROI, financial model, cost-benefit, NPV, IRR, payback period, scenario analysis, or investment justification come up. Use when user asks to "build a financial model", "revenue forecast", "DCF analysis", or mentions financial projections, valuation, scenario modeling, or sensitivity analysis.
npx claudepluginhub lauraflorentin/skills-marketplace --plugin management-consultingThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
A rigorous financial model is the foundation of credible recommendations. It forces clarity on assumptions, quantifies impact, enables trade-off analysis, and builds confidence that recommendations are justified. Poor financial models make consulting recommendations questionable and undermine implementation. This skill covers building business cases, financial analyses, and models that drive de...
Compares coding agents like Claude Code and Aider on custom YAML-defined codebase tasks using git worktrees, measuring pass rate, cost, time, and consistency.
Designs and optimizes AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, observation formats, error recovery, and context for higher task completion rates.
Designs, implements, and audits WCAG 2.2 AA accessible UIs for Web (ARIA/HTML5), iOS (SwiftUI traits), and Android (Compose semantics). Audits code for compliance gaps.
A rigorous financial model is the foundation of credible recommendations. It forces clarity on assumptions, quantifies impact, enables trade-off analysis, and builds confidence that recommendations are justified. Poor financial models make consulting recommendations questionable and undermine implementation. This skill covers building business cases, financial analyses, and models that drive decisions.
A complete business case has five components:
What:
Example (insufficient): "We need to implement a new ERP system."
Example (strong): "Current order processing takes 3 days and costs $200K annually in manual labor. We're constrained in handling growth: scaling current process would require +15 FTE. New market entrants can process orders in 4 hours. We need to reduce cycle time to <4 hours and automate exception handling to support 25% volume growth without proportional labor increase. This is a growth enabler and a cost reducer."
Develop 2-3 realistic options. Avoid straw men.
Option A: Status Quo (baseline)
Option B: Improve Current Process
Option C: Implement New Cloud System (Recommended)
Present options with equal weight (avoid leading language like "Option A (risky)" vs. "Option B (good)").
Quantify costs and benefits over a defined period (3-5 years typical for IT investments).
Costs (Year 1 vs. Ongoing):
Benefits:
Net impact: Benefits - Costs = Net Benefit
Identify key risks and mitigation strategies.
Risks (examples):
Mitigations:
High-level timeline showing:
Implementation Costs (Year 1):
Ongoing Costs (Year 2+):
Types of Costs to Include:
| Cost Type | Examples | How to Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| Direct Labor | Consulting fees, internal PM time, training delivery | Hourly rates × hours needed |
| Software/Licenses | System cost, tools, infrastructure | Vendor quotes; industry benchmarks |
| Hardware | Servers, network, equipment | Vendor quotes; IT capital standards |
| Travel | Implementation team travel, training | Per diem rates × travel days |
| Contingency | Unforeseen costs | 10-15% of direct costs |
| Indirect/Hidden | IT support time, business interruption | Survey or estimate hours required |
Avoid these mistakes:
Hard Savings (directly reduce costs):
| Benefit Type | Mechanism | Quantification | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Labor reduction | Fewer people needed for task | Hours/people saved × loaded labor cost | Save 1 FTE = $80K (salary) + $20K (benefits) = $100K/year |
| System consolidation | Eliminate redundant systems | Old system cost - new system cost | Eliminate 2 legacy systems = $60K licenses + $30K maintenance |
| Efficiency improvement | Same output, less time | Hours saved × loaded labor cost | Reduce order processing from 3 days to 1 day = 2 days × headcount × loaded rate |
| Defect/rework reduction | Fewer errors, less rework | Error frequency × cost per error | Reduce order errors from 5% to 0.5% = 450 fewer errors/month × $40/error = $216K/year |
Revenue Impact (increase sales/margin):
| Benefit Type | Mechanism | Quantification | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volume growth | Capability enables new business | Additional volume × margin per unit | Faster order processing enables 20% growth = 500 additional orders/month × $100 margin = $600K/year |
| Price realization | Better data/insight enables pricing power | Price increase × volume | Improved visibility enables 2% price increase = 2% × $10M revenue = $200K/year |
| Customer retention | Better service reduces churn | Churn reduction × customer lifetime value | Reduce churn 1% = 50 customers × $4K LTV = $200K/year |
Soft Benefits (harder to quantify but real):
How to handle soft benefits:
Simple formula:
Net Benefit (Year X) = Benefits (Year X) - Costs (Year X)
Multi-year example:
| Year | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implementation Costs | ($520K) | — | — | — | — | ($520K) |
| Ongoing Costs | ($100K) | ($205K) | ($205K) | ($205K) | ($205K) | ($920K) |
| Labor Savings | $50K | $350K | $350K | $350K | $350K | $1,450K |
| System Consolidation | — | $90K | $90K | $90K | $90K | $360K |
| Efficiency Gains | — | $200K | $200K | $200K | $200K | $800K |
| Revenue (volume growth) | — | $300K | $600K | $600K | $600K | $2,100K |
| Net Benefit | ($570K) | $735K | $1,035K | $1,035K | $1,035K | $3,270K |
Year 1 is negative (investment year); breaks even Year 2.
Concept: Value of future cash flows discounted to today's dollars.
Why it matters: $1 today is worth more than $1 in 3 years (because you could invest it and earn returns). NPV adjusts for time value of money.
Formula:
NPV = Σ [Cash Flow(t) / (1 + discount rate)^t] - Initial Investment
Where:
Example with 10% discount rate:
| Year | Net Cash Flow | Discount Factor (10%) | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | ($520K) | 1.000 | ($520K) |
| 1 | ($100K) | 0.909 | ($91K) |
| 2 | $735K | 0.826 | $607K |
| 3 | $1,035K | 0.751 | $777K |
| 4 | $1,035K | 0.683 | $707K |
| 5 | $1,035K | 0.621 | $643K |
| NPV | $2,123K |
Interpretation:
Discount rate selection:
Concept: The discount rate at which NPV = 0. Think of it as the "return on investment."
Formula: Solve for discount rate where: Σ [Cash Flow(t) / (1 + IRR)^t] = 0
Easiest to calculate in Excel using =IRR() function.
Example continuing above:
Using Excel IRR function on the cash flows: IRR = 68%
Interpretation:
When to use NPV vs. IRR:
IRR limitations:
Concept: How long until the investment is recovered?
Calculation: Find the year when cumulative cash flow becomes positive.
Using the example above:
Payback Period ≈ 1.8 years (breaks even early in Year 2)
More precise calculation:
When to use:
Limitations:
Use payback as a secondary metric alongside NPV/IRR.
For detailed templates, frameworks, and field-level guidance, read:
references/financial-modeling-reference.md — Complete framework details, templates, and examplesRead this file when the task requires: