Skill

regulatory-screening

Cross-border regulatory risk assessment for M&A transactions. Screens target revenue footprints against global antitrust and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) thresholds. Flags jurisdictions requiring mandatory pre-close filings to prevent deal delays, fines, or forced unwinding. Use when user asks to "check regulatory requirements", "antitrust screening", "regulatory risk", or mentions HSR filing, competition law, or regulatory approval.

Install

npx claudepluginhub lauraflorentin/skills-marketplace --plugin ma-advisory

Tool Access

This skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.

Preview

Cross-border M&A is fraught with overlapping regulatory regimes. Failing to file for antitrust clearance or FDI approval in a tertiary jurisdiction can lead to massive fines, mandated divestitures, or forced deal unwinding.

SKILL.md

Similar Skills

agent-harness-construction

Designs and optimizes AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, observation formats, error recovery, and context for higher task completion rates.

everything-claude-code

157.7k

agent-eval

Compares coding agents like Claude Code and Aider on custom YAML-defined codebase tasks using git worktrees, measuring pass rate, cost, time, and consistency.

everything-claude-code

157.7k

accessibility

Designs, implements, and audits WCAG 2.2 AA accessible UIs for Web (ARIA/HTML5), iOS (SwiftUI traits), and Android (Compose semantics). Audits code for compliance gaps.

everything-claude-code

157.7k

Stats

Parent Repo Stars0

Parent Repo Forks0

Last CommitMar 10, 2026

Actions

View Source View Plugin View on GitHub View README

Regulatory Screening

When to Use

Evaluating a cross-border acquisition for regulatory hurdles
Initial assessment of antitrust filing requirements across jurisdictions
FDI screening for foreign acquirers
Timeline forecasting for regulatory approvals
Risk allocation planning in definitive agreements

The /screen-fdi Protocol

How It Works

Ingest the target's geographic revenue breakdown, physical asset locations, and customer distribution
Cross-reference against the latest global thresholds for:
- Mandatory merger control filings (HSR in US, CMA in UK, EC in EU, SAMR in China, etc.)
- FDI notification requirements (CFIUS, EU FDI Screening Regulation, etc.)
- Sector-specific reviews (defense, critical infrastructure, healthcare, telecoms)
Flag jurisdictions requiring mandatory pre-close filings
Estimate review timelines and potential remedies

Output Format

## Regulatory Screening Report

### Deal Parameters
- **Acquirer jurisdiction**: [Country]
- **Target jurisdictions**: [List]
- **Combined revenue**: $[X]M
- **Sector(s)**: [Industry classification]

### Filing Requirements

| Jurisdiction | Regime | Threshold | Status | Est. Timeline | Risk Level |
|-------------|--------|-----------|--------|---------------|------------|
| United States | HSR Act | Size-of-transaction >$[X]M | FILING REQUIRED | 30-60 days | 🟡 |
| European Union | EC Merger Reg | Combined turnover >€5B | FILING REQUIRED | 25-90 working days | 🟡 |
| United Kingdom | CMA | UK turnover >£70M or >25% share | REVIEW LIKELY | 40-60 working days | 🟡 |
| China | SAMR | [Thresholds] | TO BE ASSESSED | 30-180 days | 🔴 |

### FDI-Specific Risks
| Jurisdiction | Trigger | Required Action |
|-------------|---------|-----------------|
| [Country] | [Critical infrastructure / national security] | Mandatory pre-close notification |

### Structural Recommendations
- [Strategies to avoid/mitigate regulatory triggers]
- [Suggested risk allocation in purchase agreement]

### Timeline Impact
- **Earliest possible close**: [Date estimate]
- **Critical path**: [Longest regulatory review]

⚠️ Explicit Limitation: This tool provides preliminary screening only and does not replace formal antitrust legal counsel. Thresholds change annually. Always verify current filing requirements with qualified competition lawyers.

Operating Guidelines

This is a preliminary screening tool — always verify with qualified legal counsel
Thresholds are jurisdiction and year-specific — flag if data may be outdated
Consider both target-side and acquirer-side revenue for combined thresholds
Sector-specific reviews (defense, telecoms, critical infrastructure) have lower thresholds
For Chinese (SAMR) filings, timeline can extend to 180+ days — plan accordingly
FDI screening is increasingly aggressive globally post-2020 — err on the side of filing
Include regulatory risk allocation in the SPA (who bears risk of non-approval, break fees)

Time saved: 8+ hours of preliminary legal research per transaction.

Examples

Input: "$450M acquisition of a US target with EU revenues of €320M."

Filing flag output:

Jurisdiction	Threshold	Status	Action Required
United States (HSR)	Transaction >$119.5M	🔴 FILING REQUIRED	File within 10 days of signing
European Union (EUMR)	Combined turnover >€5B	✅ Below threshold	No filing
United Kingdom (CMA)	UK turnover >£70M	🟡 BORDERLINE	Assess UK revenue split
Germany (GWB)	German turnover >€17.5M	✅ Likely below	Confirm with local counsel

Recommended timeline: Flag HSR filing to deal team immediately — 30-day waiting period affects closing timeline.

Troubleshooting

Problem	Cause	Fix
Filing thresholds are outdated	Annual threshold adjustments	Cross-reference official agency websites; thresholds update each year
FDI screening missed	Focus only on antitrust	Run separate CFIUS/FDI screen for any foreign acquirer or sensitive sector
Closing delayed by unexpected filing	Filing flagged late	Run regulatory screen at LOI stage, not post-signing
Local counsel gives conflicting advice	Jurisdictional complexity	Use coordinating international antitrust counsel for multi-jurisdiction review