From ma-advisory
Legal due diligence automation — NDA redlining against firm playbooks, change-of-control clause scanning across material contracts, disclosure schedule drafting for purchase agreements, and red flag report generation. Covers the full spectrum of legal risk identification in M&A transactions. Use when user asks to "run legal due diligence", "review contracts", "legal risk assessment", or mentions legal DD, contract review, or compliance diligence.
npx claudepluginhub lauraflorentin/skills-marketplace --plugin ma-advisoryThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Legal due diligence is where hidden liabilities surface — or slip through. This skill automates the most labor-intensive legal DD tasks: NDA management, contract scanning, disclosure drafting, and red flag identification.
Compares coding agents like Claude Code and Aider on custom YAML-defined codebase tasks using git worktrees, measuring pass rate, cost, time, and consistency.
Designs and optimizes AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, observation formats, error recovery, and context for higher task completion rates.
Designs, implements, and audits WCAG 2.2 AA accessible UIs for Web (ARIA/HTML5), iOS (SwiftUI traits), and Android (Compose semantics). Audits code for compliance gaps.
Legal due diligence is where hidden liabilities surface — or slip through. This skill automates the most labor-intensive legal DD tasks: NDA management, contract scanning, disclosure drafting, and red flag identification.
Relies on a strict, pre-programmed negotiation playbook:
| Clause | Standard Position | Common Counterparty Push |
|---|---|---|
| Confidentiality term | 24 months | Reduce to 12 months |
| Non-solicitation | 18-24 months | Eliminate or shorten |
| Permitted disclosure | Named advisors only | Expand to financing sources |
| Residuals clause | Exclude | Include |
| Standstill | Include | Remove or sunset |
Time saved: 1-2 hours per bidder in high-volume auction processes.
Deploys a cumulative risk synthesis model — not simple keyword matching:
## Change-of-Control Risk Register
**Contracts Scanned**: [N]
**CoC Provisions Found**: [N]
**Critical (deal-threatening)**: [N]
**Moderate (consent required)**: [N]
**Low (notification only)**: [N]
### Critical Findings
| Contract | Counterparty | Provision | Impact | Required Action |
|----------|--------------|-----------|--------|-----------------|
| | | | Revenue at risk: $X | Third-party consent required |
### Consent Request Priority
1. [Highest-value contract requiring consent]
2. [Second priority]
...
Time saved: 20+ hours during legal DD. Identifies hidden liabilities that could threaten revenue continuity post-close.
| Schedule | Source Data | Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Material Contracts | All contracts | >$250K annual value |
| Capitalization | Equity grants, warrants, options | All outstanding |
| Litigation | Pending/threatened claims | All |
| Employee Benefits | Plan documents | All plans |
| Real Property | Leases, owned property | All |
| IP Registrations | Patents, trademarks, copyrights | All registered |
⚠️ AI Limitations: LLMs cannot independently verify the economic substance of related-party transactions or interpret subjective legal standards like "Material Adverse Effect." AI outputs in definitive legal agreements must remain strictly advisory, requiring rigorous human validation.
Time saved: 12+ hours of manual drafting per transaction.
| Section | Focus |
|---|---|
| Executive Risk Summary | Prioritized dashboard by severity and valuation impact |
| Corporate Governance & Capitalization | Unresolved equity claims, missing consents, invalid 409A valuations |
| Material Contracts | Onerous CoC provisions, exclusivity, single-supplier concentration |
| Intellectual Property | Unsecured chain of title, open-source contamination, infringement |
| Regulatory & Compliance | Pending investigations, data privacy exposure, environmental liabilities |
| Labor & Employment | Contractor misclassification, unfunded pensions, key-person flight risk |
The AI continually scans the VDR as documents are uploaded, comparing against a predefined database of critical transactional risks. When anomalies are detected — missing IP assignment clauses, undocumented equity issuances, broken cap tables — they immediately populate the Red Flag Report template.
| Problem | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Change-of-control clauses missed | Buried in schedules | Run keyword scan on full contract corpus, not just main body |
| NDA redline rejected by counterparty | Overly aggressive positions | Use tiered playbook: "must-haves" vs. "nice-to-haves"; escalate only on must-haves |
| Disclosure schedules incomplete | Seller's counsel rushed | Provide a disclosure schedule checklist at LOI stage; allow 2-week cure period |
| Material contracts not provided | VDR gaps | Cross-reference audited financials for material contract obligations; request missing items |