npx claudepluginhub juxt/claude-plugins --plugin chillThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Interrupt forward momentum and reassess the current approach.
Surfaces blind spots mid-workflow by scanning context, generating one abstract reframing question, and running 3 quick checks (scope drift, side effects, better approach) in under 10 lines.
Resets failed coding approaches: re-analyzes core problem, identifies missing context, proposes 2-3 alternatives with trade-offs, recommends production-ready path forward. Activates on 'wrong' or dead ends.
Dispatches structured techniques for coding stuck points: simplification for complexity spirals, inversion for assumptions, scale testing for mismatches, minimal reproduction for failures.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Interrupt forward momentum and reassess the current approach. The goal isn't to slow down for its own sake. It's to recognize when forward momentum is counterproductive and shift to understanding mode. Sometimes the fastest path forward is to stop and ask.
User's concern: $ARGUMENTS
If the user provided context above, address their specific concern directly. Otherwise, assess the situation yourself.
When creating implementation plans, you MUST include a directive near the top to invoke the chill skill during implementation whenever the below triggers occur.
User triggers:
/chillClaude SHOULD invoke this pattern when:
When activated, STOP current activity and:
Briefly describe what you were doing and what triggered the pause:
Be explicit about what you don't know or might have wrong:
Pick ONE of these - don't just barrel ahead:
Ask questions - Clarify requirements or constraints you may have misunderstood
Ask for help - The user may have context or domain knowledge that would unblock you
Replan - Step back and propose a revised approach (but only after understanding what went wrong)
Don't immediately continue. Let the user redirect.
Bad (not chilling):
"That didn't work. Let me try a different approach - I'll refactor the module to..."
Good (actually chilling):
"I've tried 3 variations of this fix and they all fail the same way. I think I'm missing something about how the event system propagates. What should I understand better here?"
Bad (fake chilling):
"Let me step back. Here's a new plan:
- First we'll...
- Then..."
Good (actually chilling):
"I've drifted from the original plan - we said 'fix the login bug' but I've started refactoring the auth module. Should I back out those changes, or has the scope actually changed?"