Skill

retro

Facilitates structured sprint retrospectives with Start/Stop/Continue, 4Ls, or Sailboat formats. Analyzes team feedback and performance to generate prioritized action items with owners and deadlines.

devops

code-quality

From pm-execution

Install

Run in your terminal

npx claudepluginhub jupitermoney/pm-superic-skills --plugin pm-execution

Tool Access

This skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.

Skill Content

Similar Skills

cache-components

Guides Next.js Cache Components and Partial Prerendering (PPR) with cacheComponents enabled. Implements 'use cache', cacheLife(), cacheTag(), revalidateTag(), static/dynamic optimization, and cache debugging.

cache-components

138.6k

claude-opus-4-5-migration

2 files

Migrates code, prompts, and API calls from Claude Sonnet 4.0/4.5 or Opus 4.1 to Opus 4.5, updating model strings on Anthropic, AWS, GCP, Azure platforms.

claude-opus-4-5-migration

83.2k

evaluation-methodology

1 file

Details PluginEval's skill quality evaluation: 3 layers (static, LLM judge), 10 dimensions, rubrics, formulas, anti-patterns, badges. Use to interpret scores, improve triggering, calibrate thresholds.

plugin-eval

32.9k

Stats

Parent Repo Stars0

Parent Repo Forks0

Last CommitMar 3, 2026

Actions

View Source View Plugin View on GitHub View README

Sprint Retrospective Facilitator

Run a structured retrospective that surfaces insights and produces actionable improvements.

Context

You are facilitating a retrospective for $ARGUMENTS.

If the user provides files (sprint data, velocity charts, team feedback, or previous retro notes), read them first.

Instructions

Choose a retro format based on context (or let the user pick):

Format A — Start / Stop / Continue:
- Start: What should we begin doing?
- Stop: What should we stop doing?
- Continue: What's working well that we should keep?
Format B — 4Ls (Liked / Learned / Lacked / Longed For):
- Liked: What did the team enjoy?
- Learned: What new knowledge was gained?
- Lacked: What was missing?
- Longed For: What do we wish we had?
Format C — Sailboat:
- Wind (propels us): What's driving us forward?
- Anchor (holds us back): What's slowing us down?
- Rocks (risks): What dangers lie ahead?
- Island (goal): Where are we trying to get to?
If the user provides raw feedback (e.g., sticky notes, survey responses, Slack messages):
- Group similar items into themes
- Identify the most frequently mentioned topics
- Note sentiment patterns (frustration, energy, confusion)
Analyze the sprint performance:
- Sprint goal: achieved or not?
- Velocity vs. commitment (over-committed? under-committed?)
- Blockers encountered and how they were resolved
- Collaboration patterns (what worked, what didn't)
Generate prioritized action items:

Priority Action Item Owner Deadline Success Metric
1 [Specific, actionable improvement] [Name/Role] [Date] [How we'll know it worked]
- Limit to 2-3 action items (more won't get done)
- Each must be specific, assignable, and measurable
- Reference previous retro actions if available — were they completed?

Priority	Action Item	Owner	Deadline	Success Metric
1	[Specific, actionable improvement]	[Name/Role]	[Date]	[How we'll know it worked]

Create the retro summary:

## Sprint [X] Retrospective — [Date]

### Sprint Performance
- Goal: [Achieved / Partially / Missed]
- Committed: [X pts] | Completed: [Y pts]

### Key Themes
1. [Theme] — [summary]

### Action Items
1. [Action] — [Owner] — [By date]

### Carry-over from Last Retro
- [Previous action] — [Status: Done / In Progress / Not Started]

Save as markdown. Keep the tone constructive — the goal is improvement, not blame.