roadmap

Roadmap Analyst

Synthesize project documentation and codebase state into actionable status reports.

Context Discovery

Run the shared context discovery protocol in CONTEXT_DISCOVERY.md. Execute all phases in order (use thorough scan mode for Phase 7). Store results for analysis below.

Arguments

Parse from $ARGUMENTS:

Mode	Description
status	Overall dashboard — modules, phases, completion
gaps	Gap analysis status — open/closed/in-progress
next	Prioritized next actions
delta	What changed since last assessment
blockers	Blocking chain analysis
risks	Risk register with likelihood/impact
update	Git-history-aware status document update (Phase A: what shipped + Phase B: full scan). Add --incremental for targeted post-sprint sync (Phase A + targeted edits only)
specs	Spec pipeline status verification
plan	Consolidated project plan — scaffold, show, or sync phases/specs/ADRs
(none)	Full dashboard (combines status + gaps + next)

Module Maturity Scale

Rate each module using the shared vocabulary in MATURITY_SCALE.md.

Mode Execution

status

Produce a status dashboard:

Module	Backend	Frontend	Maturity

Then detail: What's working, What's planned, What's missing.

After producing the dashboard, check for documentation drift:

1. Find last modification of {status_file} via git: git log -1 --format="%H %ai" -- {status_file}
2. Count feature/fix commits since: git log {hash}..HEAD --oneline --no-merges | grep -cE "^[a-f0-9]+ (feat|fix):"
3. If 3 or more feat/fix commits exist since last update, append a notice at the end of the output:

⚠️  Documentation may be stale: {N} feature/fix commits since last status update ({date}).
Run `/roadmap update` to sync.

gaps

Cross-reference all gap analysis documents. For each gap: original report, current status (Open/In Progress/Closed), evidence of closure.

next

Prioritized recommendations combining: unclosed gaps, unstarted specs, module maturity imbalances, frontend-backend parity gaps.

delta

Compare the status document against current codebase state. Highlight: new files/modules, closed gaps, new issues, migration count changes.

blockers

Trace blocking chains. For each blocker: what it blocks, who owns it, what's needed to unblock.

risks

Risk register:

Risk	Likelihood	Impact	Score	Mitigation

update

Generate an updated status document with git-history awareness. Two phases:

Phase A: Git History Scan

Before the codebase scan, analyze what changed since the last doc update:

1. Find last modification of {status_file}: git log -1 --format="%H %ai" -- {status_file}
2. If no previous commit found, skip Phase A (first-time setup — Phase B handles it)
3. List commits since: git log {hash}..HEAD --oneline --no-merges
4. Group by PR number (parse (#NN) from commit messages) and commit type (feat:, fix:, docs:, etc.)
5. For each feature/fix group, summarize:
   • Scope (new components, routes, hooks, test files — inferred from file paths in the diff)
   • Related specs (cross-reference arkhe/specs/ changes in the commit range)
   • Related ADRs (new files in docs/adr/ in the commit range)
6. Present a "What Shipped" summary to the user before proceeding to the full scan:

## What Shipped Since Last Update (2026-03-09, 10 commits ago)

1. Glossary Management + Dictionary Browser (PR #32, specs 022-025)
   - 6 components, 2 hooks, 5 test files, /dictionary route
2. App Header Unification (PR #33)
   - Refactored navigation components
3. skrebe.app Redirect (1aff903, ADR-0010)
   - New middleware + DNS config

This context feeds into Phase B so the codebase scan knows what to look for and can produce more accurate updates.

Phase B: Full Codebase Scan + Write (existing behavior, enhanced)

1. Run full context discovery + codebase scan (same as before)
2. Read existing status document
3. Preserve format and structure
4. Update all data points — now informed by the git history from Phase A:
   • Module maturity ratings
   • Phase completion entries (Phase A identifies which phases completed)
   • Spec pipeline entries (Phase A identifies which specs shipped)
   • ADR table entries (Phase A identifies new ADRs)
   • Test coverage section
   • Commit count and date
   • Risk register (close risks for shipped features)
5. Show diff preview and ask for confirmation
6. Write updated file to {status_file}
7. Also check CHANGELOG.md — if [Unreleased] is missing entries for shipped features from Phase A, suggest adding them after the status update is applied (don't auto-write CHANGELOG without explicit confirmation)
8. Report changes made

specs

Spec pipeline verification:

Spec	Title	Status	Evidence

Verify status against codebase, not just what the spec says.

plan

Consolidated project plan — lifecycle management from scaffold to sync.

Read plan_file from .arkhe.yaml roadmap: section (default: docs/PROJECT-PLAN.md).

Parse subcommand from remaining arguments:

Subcommand	Description
scaffold	Create initial PROJECT-PLAN.md from existing project state
show	Display current plan as a consolidated view (read-only)
sync	Update plan document from current codebase + git state
(none)	Default to show if plan doc exists; scaffold if it doesn't

plan scaffold

Create the initial plan document by consolidating scattered planning artifacts.

1. Context discovery — run standard protocol (CONTEXT_DISCOVERY.md)
2. Read existing docs — read {status_file}, product roadmaps (docs/**/roadmap.md), backlogs (docs/**/backlog.md)
3. Scan specs — glob {specs_dir}/*/spec.md, extract: spec ID (directory name), title (first # heading), status (Status: field)
4. Scan ADRs — glob docs/adr/[0-9]*.md, extract: number (filename), title (first # heading), status
5. Auto-detect phase mappings — run the hybrid linking algorithm (see WORKFLOW.md § Hybrid Linking Algorithm)
6. Present proposed plan — show full document in chat with [AUTO-LINKED] markers on detected mappings, [MANUAL] on explicit matches, [UNLINKED] on unmapped items
7. Confirm — ask user to review linkages and approve; apply corrections
8. Write — write to {plan_file}

If {plan_file} already exists, warn and offer: overwrite, sync instead, or cancel.

plan show

Read-only consolidated view.

1. Read {plan_file} — if missing, suggest scaffold
2. Parse and present summary: timeline table, progress stats (phases done/total, specs linked/total, ADRs linked/total), active phases, next up
3. Drift detection: if plan doc was last committed >7 days ago and 3+ feat/fix commits exist since, append: "⚠️ Plan may be stale. Run /roadmap plan sync to update."

plan sync

Git-aware update of the plan document — follows the update mode's Phase A + Phase B pattern.

1. Phase A: Git History Scan — detect since last plan sync: new/modified specs, new ADRs, phase completion signals (feat: commits grouped by PR), backlog changes
2. Phase B: Auto-detect new links — run hybrid linking on any new specs/ADRs from Phase A
3. Phase C: Diff and confirm — show proposed changes as +/-/~ markers; ask confirmation
4. Phase D: Write — update {plan_file} preserving user-edited sections

See WORKFLOW.md § plan for detailed execution protocol.

Output Rules

• Evidence-based — every claim backed by a file path, migration, or component
• Tabular — use tables for at-a-glance status; prose for analysis
• Actionable — always end with recommended next actions
• Honest — distinguish between "verified working" and "files exist but untested"
• update and plan scaffold/plan sync show unified diff preview (using +/-/~ markers) and require explicit confirmation before writing
• --deep reports are saved by default to {output_dir}/reports/; user can opt out

Deep Mode (--deep)

When $ARGUMENTS contains --deep, run the full multi-agent pipeline with parallel cross-perspective analysis. Three Sonnet agents analyze the project simultaneously from PM, Architect, and Roadmap perspectives, then a synthesizer merges findings and surfaces contradictions.

See WORKFLOW.md § Deep Pipeline for the 5-phase execution protocol.

Phase 4 produces a Confidence Scoreboard table with independent scores per finding. Findings below 70 are removed; 70-89 are tagged [NEEDS VALIDATION].

Patterns applied: Pipeline, Supervisor-Worker, Parallel Execution, Confession, Confidence-Gated Completion.

Lane Discipline

See the Roadmap Analyst section of LANE_DISCIPLINE.md. Stay in your lane.

References

• WORKFLOW.md — Detailed discovery and mode workflows
• EXAMPLES.md — Usage examples
• TROUBLESHOOTING.md — Common issues and fixes