From clay-pack
Guides migration from ZoomInfo, Apollo, Clearbit, Lusha, or custom scripts to Clay, auditing stacks with TypeScript and consolidating enrichment workflows.
npx claudepluginhub jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --plugin clay-packThis skill is limited to using the following tools:
Comprehensive guide for migrating from standalone enrichment tools (ZoomInfo, Apollo, Clearbit, Lusha) to Clay, or consolidating multiple tools into a single Clay-based pipeline. Clay replaces the need for individual provider subscriptions by aggregating 150+ providers into waterfall enrichment workflows.
Designs production Clay enrichment pipelines using table schemas, waterfall patterns, and CRM sync flows. Useful for new integrations, data flow reviews, or pipeline standards.
Guides Klaviyo migrations from v1/v2 APIs, Mailchimp/SendGrid, or full re-platforming via strangler fig pattern. Includes complexity tables, API mappings, and TypeScript SDK examples.
Designs B2B lead enrichment waterfalls, ICP scoring frameworks with firmographic/technographic/intent signals, and contact verification pipelines using Clay, Apollo, ZoomInfo.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Comprehensive guide for migrating from standalone enrichment tools (ZoomInfo, Apollo, Clearbit, Lusha) to Clay, or consolidating multiple tools into a single Clay-based pipeline. Clay replaces the need for individual provider subscriptions by aggregating 150+ providers into waterfall enrichment workflows.
| Migration | Complexity | Duration | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single provider -> Clay | Low | 1-2 weeks | Low |
| Multiple providers -> Clay | Medium | 2-4 weeks | Medium |
| Custom scripts -> Clay | Medium | 2-4 weeks | Medium |
| Full GTM stack migration | High | 1-2 months | High |
// migration/audit.ts — document your current enrichment setup
interface EnrichmentAudit {
provider: string;
monthlyVolume: number;
monthlyCoost: number;
dataFields: string[];
hitRate: number; // % of lookups that return data
integrationMethod: string; // API, CSV, Zapier, native CRM
canExportHistory: boolean;
}
const currentStack: EnrichmentAudit[] = [
{
provider: 'ZoomInfo',
monthlyVolume: 5000,
monthlyCoost: 15000, // ZoomInfo is expensive
dataFields: ['email', 'phone', 'title', 'company', 'revenue'],
hitRate: 75,
integrationMethod: 'API + Salesforce native',
canExportHistory: true,
},
{
provider: 'Apollo.io',
monthlyVolume: 3000,
monthlyCoost: 400,
dataFields: ['email', 'title', 'company', 'linkedin'],
hitRate: 65,
integrationMethod: 'API',
canExportHistory: true,
},
{
provider: 'Custom Python scripts',
monthlyVolume: 1000,
monthlyCoost: 0, // Just developer time
dataFields: ['email', 'company_data'],
hitRate: 40,
integrationMethod: 'Cron job + DB',
canExportHistory: true,
},
];
function generateMigrationReport(stack: EnrichmentAudit[]): void {
const totalCost = stack.reduce((s, p) => s + p.monthlyCoost, 0);
const totalVolume = stack.reduce((s, p) => s + p.monthlyVolume, 0);
console.log(`Current stack: ${stack.length} providers`);
console.log(`Total monthly cost: $${totalCost}`);
console.log(`Total monthly volume: ${totalVolume} lookups`);
console.log(`Average hit rate: ${(stack.reduce((s, p) => s + p.hitRate, 0) / stack.length).toFixed(0)}%`);
console.log(`\nClay equivalent (Growth plan): $495/mo + provider API keys`);
}
# migration/field-mapping.yaml
field_mapping:
# Your current field -> Clay enrichment column
email: "Work Email (Waterfall: Apollo > Hunter)"
phone: "Phone Number (Apollo)"
job_title: "Job Title (Apollo/PDL)"
company_name: "Company Name (Clearbit)"
company_revenue: "Revenue (Clearbit)"
employee_count: "Employee Count (Clearbit)"
industry: "Industry (Clearbit)"
tech_stack: "Technologies (BuiltWith via Claygent)"
linkedin: "LinkedIn URL (Apollo)"
# Fields that don't have direct Clay equivalents:
intent_signals: "Use Clay's Web Intent feature (Growth plan)"
custom_research: "Claygent AI research column"
Run Clay alongside your existing tools to validate data quality:
// migration/parallel-run.ts
interface ComparisonResult {
field: string;
oldValue: string | null;
clayValue: string | null;
match: boolean;
}
async function compareEnrichment(
email: string,
oldData: Record<string, unknown>,
clayData: Record<string, unknown>,
): Promise<ComparisonResult[]> {
const fieldsToCompare = ['company_name', 'job_title', 'employee_count', 'industry'];
return fieldsToCompare.map(field => ({
field,
oldValue: (oldData[field] as string) || null,
clayValue: (clayData[field] as string) || null,
match: String(oldData[field]).toLowerCase() === String(clayData[field]).toLowerCase(),
}));
}
// Run on a sample of 500 contacts from your CRM
// Compare Clay's enrichment with your current provider's data
// Target: Clay should match or exceed current hit rates
# Clay table configuration to replace multi-provider stack
replacement_table:
name: "Outbound Leads (Migrated)"
sources:
- webhook (replaces API calls to ZoomInfo/Apollo)
- CRM import (replaces native CRM enrichment)
- CSV upload (replaces manual processes)
enrichment_columns:
1_company_lookup:
provider: clearbit
replaces: "ZoomInfo company data"
own_api_key: true # 0 Clay credits
2_email_waterfall:
providers: [apollo, hunter]
replaces: "ZoomInfo email + Apollo email"
own_api_keys: true
3_person_enrichment:
provider: apollo
replaces: "Apollo person data"
own_api_key: true
4_ai_research:
type: claygent
replaces: "Custom Python research scripts"
prompt: "Research {{Company Name}} for recent news and tech stack"
5_icp_scoring:
type: formula
replaces: "Custom scoring in Python/SQL"
// migration/traffic-shift.ts
interface MigrationConfig {
clayPercentage: number; // 0-100, gradually increase
legacyEnabled: boolean;
}
class MigrationRouter {
constructor(private config: MigrationConfig) {}
shouldUseClay(): boolean {
return Math.random() * 100 < this.config.clayPercentage;
}
async enrichLead(lead: Record<string, unknown>): Promise<Record<string, unknown>> {
if (this.shouldUseClay()) {
return this.enrichViaClay(lead);
}
return this.enrichViaLegacy(lead);
}
}
// Migration schedule:
// Week 4, Day 1: 10% to Clay, 90% legacy
// Week 4, Day 3: 25% to Clay, 75% legacy
// Week 4, Day 5: 50% to Clay, 50% legacy
// Week 5, Day 1: 100% to Clay, legacy disabled
After full migration and 2-week monitoring:
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Lower hit rate on Clay | Different provider coverage | Adjust waterfall order, add providers |
| Missing fields | Clay uses different field names | Update field mapping |
| Data format mismatch | Different date/number formats | Add transformation in webhook handler |
| CRM duplicates during parallel | Both systems writing | Deduplicate on email in CRM |
For advanced troubleshooting, see clay-advanced-troubleshooting.