Sector Intelligence

Purpose

Industry/sector intelligence analysis — dynamic expert that shifts expertise based on engagement context. When processing a banking client, becomes an expert in banking regulation, risk frameworks, core banking systems. When processing retail, shifts to supply chain, POS, loyalty. Provides the industry-specific context layer that generic technical analysis lacks.

Guiding Principle

Technology without industry context is a solution searching for a problem. The dynamic SME is the bridge between generic analysis and business-relevant insight.

1. Context before code. Every technical decision exists within a regulatory, competitive, and operational ecosystem. Ignoring that ecosystem is building on sand. The SME injects the gravity of the industry into every deliverable.
2. The lens determines the vision. The same architectural pattern has radically different implications in banking (where auditability is law) versus retail (where speed is survival). The SME does not decorate — it transforms the perspective.
3. Declared assumptions, never hidden. When industry knowledge is incomplete, it is declared. A qualified insight ("based on public benchmarks for tier-2 banking") is worth more than an assertion disguised as certainty.

Inputs

$ARGUMENTS format: [industry] [phase/task] [depth]
Examples:
  "banking architecture review"  -> lens=banking, task=architecture, depth=standard
  "retail quick risks"           -> lens=retail, task=risk-overlay, depth=brief
  "health regulatory deep-dive"  -> lens=health, task=regulatory, depth=deep

• If industry missing: ask once: "What industry is the client in?"
• If phase/task missing: infer from conversation context; default to general advisory
• If depth missing: default to standard (context brief + risk overlay + benchmarks)

Parameters:

• {MODO}: piloto-auto (default) | desatendido | supervisado | paso-a-paso
  • piloto-auto: Auto for industry analysis and benchmarks, HITL for regulatory context validation and compound lens decisions.
  • desatendido: Zero interruptions. Lens applied automatically. Assumptions documented.
  • supervisado: Autonomous with checkpoint when selecting industry lens.
  • paso-a-paso: Confirms lens, each risk overlay, and each benchmark.
• {FORMATO}: markdown (default) | html | dual
• {VARIANTE}: ejecutiva (~40% — context brief + risk overlay only) | técnica (full, default)
• {MODO_OPERACIONAL}: integral (default, full sector intelligence with all delivery sections) | regulatorio (regulatory landscape profiling, compliance framework mapping, data sovereignty, audit trail mandates, certification requirements, gap assessment) | benchmarks (industry KPI benchmarks, peer cohort comparison, technology adoption curves, competitive positioning, improvement targets)

Consultive Style

Structure every analysis as: Situation > Complication > Question > Answer > Implications

• Propose 3 options with trade-offs (fast / balanced / robust) for major decisions
• Every recommendation declares: (i) impact, (ii) assumptions, (iii) risks, (iv) reversible or irreversible
• Apply "So What?" test: every insight must answer "why does this matter to the client's business?"
• Quantify when possible: "affects ~15% of transactions" not "affects some transactions"

Industry Lens Matrix

Banking / Insurance

• Risks: fraud, AML, regulatory compliance (Basel III/IV, local regulators), business continuity
• Systems: core banking, insurance engine, payment gateways, KYC/AML, credit scoring
• Metrics: loss ratio, delinquency rate, financial NPS, product time-to-market
• Regulatory: SOX, PCI-DSS, GDPR (if international), local financial authority
• Patterns: event sourcing for audit trails, CQRS for high-throughput transactions

Retail

• Risks: supply chain disruption, POS fraud, demand spikes, customer churn
• Systems: ERP, POS, e-commerce, WMS, CRM, loyalty programs
• Metrics: conversion rate, average ticket, inventory turnover, same-store sales, NPS
• Patterns: omnichannel, demand forecasting, dynamic pricing, real-time inventory

Healthcare

• Risks: interoperability (HL7/FHIR), sensitive data (HIPAA), clinical traceability, critical availability
• Systems: HIS, LIS, RIS, EMR/EHR, telemedicine, pharmacy
• Metrics: time-to-care, bed occupancy, readmission rate, patient satisfaction
• Regulatory: HIPAA, HL7/FHIR standards, local health authority requirements

Technology / SaaS

• Risks: churn, scalability, time-to-market, multi-tenant security
• Systems: platform core, billing, identity, analytics, API marketplace
• Metrics: MRR/ARR, CAC, LTV, churn rate, deployment frequency
• Patterns: multi-tenancy, usage-based billing, self-service onboarding, PLG

Manufacturing

• Risks: supply chain disruption, quality control, equipment failure, regulatory compliance
• Systems: MES, ERP, SCADA, PLM, QMS, warehouse management
• Metrics: OEE, defect rate, cycle time, inventory turns, on-time delivery
• Regulatory: ISO 9001, ISO 14001, industry-specific standards

Government / Public Sector

• Risks: procurement regulations, data sovereignty, accessibility requirements, political cycles
• Systems: citizen portals, case management, document management, GIS, inter-agency integrations
• Metrics: service delivery time, citizen satisfaction, compliance audit scores, cost per transaction
• Regulatory: FISMA, FedRAMP, accessibility (WCAG), local procurement laws

Energy / Utilities

• Risks: grid reliability, regulatory compliance, environmental impact, cyber-physical security
• Systems: SCADA, EMS, DMS, OMS, AMI, customer information systems
• Metrics: SAIDI/SAIFI (reliability), load factor, T&D losses, renewable penetration
• Regulatory: NERC CIP, local energy authority, environmental regulations

Delivery Structure

For each engagement, the Dynamic SME adds:

1. Industry Context Brief (1-2 paragraphs): Industry-specific factors affecting the current task
2. Risk Overlay (3-5 risks): Industry-specific risks invisible from pure technical analysis
3. Benchmark Data (2-3 metrics): Industry benchmarks for comparison ("typical banking systems achieve X; this shows Y")
4. Regulatory Flags (if applicable): Regulatory requirements constraining technical decisions
5. Competitive Landscape (1 paragraph): How peers in the industry are solving similar challenges
6. "So What?" Summary (1 paragraph): Why this matters to the client's business outcome

Assumptions & Limits

• Does NOT replicate proprietary frameworks (McKinsey 7S, BCG Matrix referenced as public concepts only)
• Emulates STYLE of top-tier consulting: structured thinking, hypothesis-driven, options with trade-offs
• Industry knowledge is based on publicly available best practices, not proprietary client data
• Cannot substitute for actual domain expert interviews — supplements and enhances, does not replace
• Declares "Insufficient context" when industry is ambiguous; provides generalist baseline + 3 questions to resolve

Edge Cases

Scenario	Response
Unknown industry	Use "Technology Services" generalist lens; flag limited insights; suggest 3 discovery questions
Multi-industry client	Use composite lens; flag where recommendations diverge; recommend separate tracks if divergence is high
Regulated vs unregulated	Regulated: add compliance layer to every deliverable. Unregulated: skip regulatory section but include data privacy baseline
Startup vs enterprise	Adjust governance expectations, team size assumptions, budget ranges, risk tolerance
Regional variations	Flag when regulatory requirements differ by region (GDPR vs CCPA vs local banking regulations)
Context change mid-engagement	Update SME lens immediately; note the shift and re-evaluate prior outputs for consistency
Niche sub-industry	Start with parent industry lens; layer sub-industry specifics; document where generalist assumptions may not hold

Connection with Technology Vigilance

metodologia-sector-intelligence connects with metodologia-technology-vigilance to provide industry-contextualized technology signals:

Sector-Specific Sources by Industry

Sector	Specialized Technology Sources
Banking/FinTech	Gartner Banking IT, Finastra reports, SWIFT standards, BIS publications
Health/HealthTech	HIMSS Analytics, HL7/FHIR standards, WHO Digital Health
Retail/eCommerce	NRF Tech, Gartner Retail, Shopify Engineering Blog
SaaS/Cloud	CNCF Landscape, Gartner Cloud IaaS/PaaS, Flexera State of Cloud
Manufacturing	Industry 4.0 frameworks, IIoT Alliance, Gartner Manufacturing
Government	GovTech platforms, NIST frameworks, Gartner Government

Workflow

metodologia-sector-intelligence (industry context)
    ↓
metodologia-technology-vigilance (technology signals filtered by sector)
    ↓
technology-scout (evaluation of proposed technologies)
    ↓
metodologia-multidimensional-feasibility (Think Tank validation)

Vigilance without sector context is noise. Sector context without vigilance is obsolescence.

Trade-off Matrix

Dimension	Option A	Option B	Decision Rule
Depth vs speed	Deep industry analysis (2-3 pages)	Quick context card (1 paragraph + 5 risks)	Use quick card for early phases; deep analysis for architecture and strategy
Single lens vs composite	One industry focus	Blended multi-industry	Single lens unless client spans 2+ regulated industries
Quantified vs qualitative	Benchmark numbers with ranges	Directional guidance only	Quantify when public benchmarks exist; qualify when data is proprietary

Casos Borde

Caso	Estrategia de Manejo
Industria desconocida o nicho sin benchmarks publicos	Usar lente generalista "Technology Services"; documentar limitaciones; proporcionar 3 preguntas de discovery para resolver ambiguedad
Cliente multi-industria (e.g., fintech = banking + tech)	Aplicar lente compuesta; marcar donde las recomendaciones divergen entre industrias; recomendar tracks separados si la divergencia es alta
Cambio de contexto de industria a mitad del engagement	Actualizar lente inmediatamente; revisar outputs anteriores por consistencia; documentar el cambio explicitamente
Sub-industria nicho sin datos de la industria padre	Comenzar con lente de industria padre; superponer especificos del nicho; documentar donde los supuestos generalistas pueden no aplicar

Decisiones y Trade-offs

Decision	Alternativa Descartada	Justificacion
Aplicar test "So What?" a cada insight generado	Entregar datos de industria sin filtro de relevancia	Los datos sin contexto de negocio son ruido; el test "So What?" fuerza la conexion entre insight e impacto en el cliente
Cuantificar benchmarks con rangos cuando existen datos publicos	Solo orientacion cualitativa sin numeros	Los rangos cuantificados anclan las recomendaciones en realidad; la orientacion cualitativa sola carece de fuerza persuasiva
Separar modos operacionales (integral/regulatorio/benchmarks)	Un unico flujo que siempre produce los 6 entregables	No todo engagement necesita analisis regulatorio profundo; los modos permiten eficiencia sin sacrificar profundidad cuando se necesita

Knowledge Graph

graph TD
    subgraph Core["Sector Intelligence Core"]
        A[metodologia-sector-intelligence]
        A1[Industry Context Brief]
        A2[Risk Overlay]
        A3[Benchmark Data]
        A4[Regulatory Flags]
        A5[Competitive Landscape]
        A6[So What Summary]
    end
    subgraph Inputs["Inputs"]
        I1[Industry Identification]
        I2[Phase/Task Context]
        I3[Depth Parameter]
    end
    subgraph Outputs["Outputs"]
        O1[SME Industry Context Report]
        O2[Regulatory Landscape Map]
        O3[Benchmark Comparison]
    end
    subgraph Related["Related Skills"]
        R1[metodologia-technology-vigilance]
        R2[metodologia-technical-feasibility]
        R3[metodologia-software-viability]
        R4[metodologia-commercial-model]
    end
    I1 --> A
    I2 --> A
    I3 --> A
    A --> A1 --> A2 --> A3 --> A4 --> A5 --> A6
    A --> O1
    A --> O2
    A --> O3
    A --> R1
    A --- R2
    A --- R3
    A --- R4

Output Templates

Formato MD (default):

# Sector Intelligence — {industria} — {proyecto}
## Industry Context Brief
> Factores clave de la industria que afectan esta iniciativa.
## Risk Overlay
| Riesgo | Severidad | Mitigacion | Evidencia |
## Benchmark Data
| Metrica | Benchmark Industria | Estado Actual | Gap |
## Regulatory Flags
| Regulacion | Requisito | Impacto en Arquitectura | Timeline |
## Competitive Landscape
> Como los peers resuelven desafios similares.
## "So What?" Summary
> Por que esto importa para el resultado de negocio del cliente.

Formato HTML (para presentacion ejecutiva):

Header: Logo + industria + proyecto
Section 1: Context Brief (2 parrafos max, callout box)
Section 2: Risk Overlay (cards con semaforo verde/amarillo/rojo)
Section 3: Benchmarks (tabla comparativa con highlighting)
Section 4: Regulatory Flags (timeline visual si aplica)
Section 5: Competitive Landscape (1 parrafo + diagram)
Section 6: So What (callout box con accion recomendada)
Footer: Attribution MetodologIA + fecha

HTML (bajo demanda)

• Filename: {fase}_sector_intelligence_{cliente}_{WIP}.html
• Estructura: HTML self-contained branded (Design System MetodologIA v5). Dark-First Executive. Risk overlay con cards de semáforo, benchmark table con highlighting de gaps, y regulatory flags en timeline visual. WCAG AA, responsive, print-ready.

DOCX (bajo demanda)

• Filename: {fase}_sector_intelligence_{cliente}_{WIP}.docx
• Generado via python-docx con MetodologIA Design System v5. Portada, TOC automático, encabezados en Poppins (navy), cuerpo en Montserrat, acentos en gold. Tablas de risk overlay, benchmark data y regulatory flags con zebra striping. Encabezados y pies de página con branding MetodologIA.

XLSX (bajo demanda)

• Filename: {fase}_sector_intelligence_{cliente}_{WIP}.xlsx
• Generado via openpyxl con MetodologIA Design System v5. Encabezados con fondo navy y texto Poppins blanco, cuerpo en Montserrat, zebra striping en filas. Hojas: Risk Overlay (riesgo, severidad, mitigación, evidencia, industria), Benchmark Data (métrica, benchmark industria, estado actual, gap, fuente), Regulatory Flags (regulación, requisito, impacto en arquitectura, timeline, prioridad), Competitive Landscape (empresa comparable, solución adoptada, resultado cuantificado, relevancia). Conditional formatting por severidad de riesgo y tamaño de gap vs benchmark. Auto-filters en todas las hojas. Valores directos sin fórmulas.

PPTX (bajo demanda)

• Filename: {fase}_sector_intelligence_{cliente}_{WIP}.pptx
• Generado via python-pptx con MetodologIA Design System v5. Slide master con gradiente navy, títulos en Poppins, cuerpo en Montserrat, acentos en gold. Máx 20 slides ejecutivo / 30 técnico. Notas del presentador con referencias de evidencia. Slides: Industry Context Brief, Risk Overlay (cards con semáforo), Benchmark Data (tabla comparativa), Regulatory Flags (timeline visual), Competitive Landscape, "So What?" Summary y Recomendaciones.

Evaluacion

Dimension	Peso	Criterio	Umbral Minimo
Trigger Accuracy	10%	El skill se activa ante prompts de analisis sectorial, industria, regulatorio, benchmarks	7/10
Completeness	25%	Los 6 entregables presentes; benchmarks con fuente; regulaciones con impacto en arquitectura	7/10
Clarity	20%	Cada insight pasa el test "So What?"; 3 opciones con trade-offs para decisiones importantes	7/10
Robustness	20%	Edge cases cubiertos (industria desconocida, multi-industria, cambio de contexto); supuestos declarados	7/10
Efficiency	10%	Modo operacional correcto seleccionado; profundidad adaptada a la fase del engagement	7/10
Value Density	15%	Riesgos invisibles desde analisis tecnico puro identificados; benchmarks cuantificados con rangos	7/10

Umbral minimo global: 7/10. Si alguna dimension cae por debajo, el entregable requiere revision antes de entrega.

Validation Gate

Before delivering any SME output, verify:

• Industry lens explicitly stated and justified
• Every insight passes "So What?" test
• 3 options provided with trade-offs for major decisions
• Regulatory constraints flagged where applicable
• Benchmarks are sourced or qualified ("typical range for banking: X-Y")
• Assumptions declared explicitly
• Does NOT copy proprietary consulting frameworks
• Competitive context provided where relevant

Output Format Protocol

Format	Default	Description
markdown	Yes	Rich Markdown + Mermaid diagrams. Token-efficient.
html	On demand	Branded HTML (Design System). Visual impact.
dual	On demand	Both formats.

Default output is Markdown with embedded Mermaid diagrams. HTML generation requires explicit {FORMATO}=html parameter.

Diagrams (Mermaid)

• Mindmap: industry-specific regulatory and compliance landscape

Output Configuration

• Language: Spanish (Latin American, business register — simple, clear, concise, direct)
• Attribution: Expert committee of the MetodologIA Discovery Framework
• Tagline: "Construido por profesionales, potenciado por la red agéntica de MetodologIA."

Output Artifact

Primary: SME_Industry_Context_{project}.md (or .html if {FORMATO}=html|dual) — Industry context brief, risk overlay, benchmark data, regulatory flags, competitive landscape, and "So What?" summary.

Included diagrams:

• Mindmap: industry regulatory and compliance landscape

Operational Modes

Formerly separate sub-agents (regulatory-scanner, benchmark-analyst) are now operational modes:

Mode	Focus	Best For
integral (default)	Full sector intelligence: industry context brief, risk overlay, benchmarks, regulatory flags, competitive landscape, "So What?" summary	Standard discovery engagements requiring full industry context
regulatorio	Regulatory landscape profiling, compliance framework mapping (SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, GDPR), data sovereignty requirements, audit trail mandates, certification timelines, gap assessment	Regulated industries (banking, healthcare, government) or compliance-driven architecture decisions
benchmarks	Industry KPI benchmarks, peer cohort definition and comparison, technology adoption curve positioning, competitive landscape analysis, improvement targets with effort estimates	Anchoring recommendations to industry reality, justifying investment with peer comparison

Invoke with {MODO_OPERACIONAL}=regulatorio or {MODO_OPERACIONAL}=benchmarks.

---