Multi-Format Deliverable Production

TL;DR: Produces project deliverables in multiple formats (Markdown, HTML, Mermaid diagrams) while maintaining brand consistency, evidence tagging, and quality standards. Manages the deliverable production pipeline from draft through review to approved final versions.

Principio Rector

Un entregable de calidad es invisible en su formato y visible en su contenido. El formato debe servir al contenido, no al revés. Markdown-first asegura versionabilidad; HTML agrega interactividad y branding; PDF asegura distribución fiel. El pipeline de producción aplica quality checks consistentes independientemente del formato.

Assumptions & Limits

• Assumes content is authored in Markdown as primary format [SUPUESTO]
• Assumes APEX branding tokens are available in canonical-tokens.md [SUPUESTO]
• Breaks if content lacks evidence tags — output engineering cannot add evidence post-hoc [PLAN]
• Scope limited to format production and quality enforcement; content creation is handled by domain skills [PLAN]
• Does not generate content — transforms and formats content produced by other skills [PLAN]

Usage

/pm:output-engineering $SOURCE_FILE --format=html --brand=apex
/pm:output-engineering $SOURCE_FILE --format=markdown,html --status=WIP
/pm:output-engineering $PROJECT_DIR --batch --format=html --quality-check

Parameters:

Parameter	Required	Description
$SOURCE_FILE	Yes	Path to source Markdown file or project directory
--format	No	markdown / html / both (default: markdown)
--brand	No	apex / minimal (default: apex)
--status	No	WIP / Aprobado (default: WIP)
--batch	No	Process all deliverables in directory
--quality-check	No	Run Excellence Loop validation

Service Type Routing

{TIPO_PROYECTO}: All project types produce deliverables. Format selection depends on audience (technical = Markdown, executive = HTML/PDF, regulatory = PDF with signatures).

Before Producing Output

1. Read source content — verify completeness and evidence tagging [PLAN]
2. Read references/ontology/canonical-tokens.md — load design tokens for HTML production [PLAN]
3. Check naming convention — apply {fase}_{entregable}_{proyecto}_{status}.{ext} [PLAN]
4. Verify approval status — only {Aprobado} after governance approval [PLAN]

Entrada (Input Requirements)

• Draft content in Markdown
• Target format(s) required
• Branding requirements (APEX tokens)
• Evidence tags for content verification
• Approval workflow requirements

Proceso (Protocol)

1. Content review — Verify draft content completeness and accuracy
2. Evidence tagging — Ensure all assertions have evidence tags
3. Format selection — Determine target format(s) based on audience
4. Template application — Apply appropriate template per format
5. Brand compliance — Verify brand colors, fonts, and layout
6. Diagram rendering — Render Mermaid diagrams to appropriate format
7. Quality check — Apply Excellence Loop criteria
8. Version tagging — Apply {WIP} or {Aprobado} naming convention
9. Slug naming — Apply {fase}_{entregable}_{proyecto}_{status}.{ext} convention
10. Distribution — Deliver to appropriate channels per communication plan

Edge Cases

1. Format conversion losing content or structure — Validate output against source; flag any content loss; provide both formats if conversion is lossy.
2. Evidence tags missing from content — Return to content author; do not produce final format without evidence compliance.
3. Deliverable blocked in approval workflow — Maintain {WIP} tag; do not allow {Aprobado} without governance sign-off.
4. Batch processing with mixed quality levels — Produce quality report per deliverable; do not batch-approve inconsistent quality.

Example: Good vs Bad

Good Output Engineering:

Attribute	Value
Naming	03_Schedule_ProyectoAlfa_{WIP}.md — correct convention [PLAN]
Evidence	Every assertion tagged: [PLAN], [METRIC], [SCHEDULE], [STAKEHOLDER]
Brand compliance	APEX tokens applied; zero green indicators; correct fonts [PLAN]
Quality check	10/10 Excellence Loop criteria passed
Format	Markdown source + HTML branded version produced simultaneously

Bad Output Engineering: File named "schedule_v3_final_FINAL.docx" with no evidence tags, random colors, no branding, and "final" version that is actually still in draft. No naming convention, no quality check, no version control.

Salida (Deliverables)

• Formatted deliverable in target format(s)
• Quality check report
• Version history
• Distribution confirmation

Validation Gate

• All content assertions have evidence tags — zero untagged claims
• No formatting errors — HTML renders correctly, Markdown parses cleanly
• All sections present in output — no content loss during conversion
• Brand compliance verified — APEX colors, fonts, and layout tokens only
• Naming convention followed: {fase}_{entregable}_{proyecto}_{status}.{ext}
• {WIP}/{Aprobado} status matches actual approval state
• Version history maintained — changes traceable between versions
• Format serves audience — technical gets Markdown, executives get HTML/PDF
• Quality check (Excellence Loop) passed with documented results
• Deliverable self-contained — no broken links or missing dependencies

Escalation Triggers

• Format conversion losing content or structure
• Brand compliance failures
• Deliverable blocked in approval workflow
• Format not supported by recipient platform

Additional Resources

Resource	When to Read	Location
Body of Knowledge	When applying deliverable production best practices	references/body-of-knowledge.md
State of the Art	When implementing automated deliverable pipelines	references/state-of-the-art.md
Knowledge Graph	When mapping output to pipeline deliverable requirements	references/knowledge-graph.mmd
Use Case Prompts	When producing deliverables for specific project types	prompts/use-case-prompts.md
Metaprompts	When adapting output for non-APEX branding	prompts/metaprompts.md
Sample Output	When reviewing expected deliverable quality	examples/sample-output.md

Output Configuration

• Language: Spanish (Latin American, business register)
• Evidence: [PLAN], [SCHEDULE], [METRIC], [INFERENCIA], [SUPUESTO], [STAKEHOLDER]
• Branding: #2563EB royal blue, #F59E0B amber (NEVER green), #0F172A dark

---

---

Sub-Agents

Format Converter

Format Converter Agent

Core Responsibility

Converts markdown to HTML, DOCX, XLSX formats. This agent operates autonomously, applying systematic analysis and producing structured outputs.

Process

1. Gather Inputs. Collect all relevant data, documents, and stakeholder inputs needed for analysis.
2. Analyze Context. Assess the project context, methodology, phase, and constraints.
3. Apply Framework. Apply the appropriate analytical framework or model.
4. Generate Findings. Produce detailed findings with evidence tags and quantified impacts.
5. Validate Results. Cross-check findings against related artifacts for consistency.
6. Formulate Recommendations. Transform findings into actionable recommendations with owners and timelines.
7. Deliver Output. Produce the final structured output with executive summary, analysis, and action items.

Output Format

• Analysis Report — Structured findings with evidence tags and severity ratings.
• Recommendation Register — Actionable items with owners, deadlines, and success criteria.
• Executive Summary — 3-5 bullet point summary for stakeholder communication.

Ghost Menu Injector

Ghost Menu Injector Agent

Core Responsibility

Injects navigation ghost menus into deliverables. This agent operates autonomously, applying systematic analysis and producing structured outputs.

Process

1. Gather Inputs. Collect all relevant data, documents, and stakeholder inputs needed for analysis.
2. Analyze Context. Assess the project context, methodology, phase, and constraints.
3. Apply Framework. Apply the appropriate analytical framework or model.
4. Generate Findings. Produce detailed findings with evidence tags and quantified impacts.
5. Validate Results. Cross-check findings against related artifacts for consistency.
6. Formulate Recommendations. Transform findings into actionable recommendations with owners and timelines.
7. Deliver Output. Produce the final structured output with executive summary, analysis, and action items.

Output Format

• Analysis Report — Structured findings with evidence tags and severity ratings.
• Recommendation Register — Actionable items with owners, deadlines, and success criteria.
• Executive Summary — 3-5 bullet point summary for stakeholder communication.

Multi Format Packager

Multi Format Packager Agent

Core Responsibility

Packages deliverables in multiple formats for distribution. This agent operates autonomously, applying systematic analysis and producing structured outputs.

Process

1. Gather Inputs. Collect all relevant data, documents, and stakeholder inputs needed for analysis.
2. Analyze Context. Assess the project context, methodology, phase, and constraints.
3. Apply Framework. Apply the appropriate analytical framework or model.
4. Generate Findings. Produce detailed findings with evidence tags and quantified impacts.
5. Validate Results. Cross-check findings against related artifacts for consistency.
6. Formulate Recommendations. Transform findings into actionable recommendations with owners and timelines.
7. Deliver Output. Produce the final structured output with executive summary, analysis, and action items.

Output Format

• Analysis Report — Structured findings with evidence tags and severity ratings.
• Recommendation Register — Actionable items with owners, deadlines, and success criteria.
• Executive Summary — 3-5 bullet point summary for stakeholder communication.

Template Processor

Template Processor Agent

Core Responsibility

Processes templates with project data. This agent operates autonomously, applying systematic analysis and producing structured outputs.

Process

1. Gather Inputs. Collect all relevant data, documents, and stakeholder inputs needed for analysis.
2. Analyze Context. Assess the project context, methodology, phase, and constraints.
3. Apply Framework. Apply the appropriate analytical framework or model.
4. Generate Findings. Produce detailed findings with evidence tags and quantified impacts.
5. Validate Results. Cross-check findings against related artifacts for consistency.
6. Formulate Recommendations. Transform findings into actionable recommendations with owners and timelines.
7. Deliver Output. Produce the final structured output with executive summary, analysis, and action items.

Output Format

• Analysis Report — Structured findings with evidence tags and severity ratings.
• Recommendation Register — Actionable items with owners, deadlines, and success criteria.
• Executive Summary — 3-5 bullet point summary for stakeholder communication.