This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a pitch", "build a business case", "justify the investment", "present to executives", or mentions ROI analysis, NPV, IRR, payback period, or C-level presentation. [EXPLICIT] It generates executive pitch decks with quantified problem statements, 4-pillar value propositions, 3-option comparison analysis, investment summaries with financial models, and PAS persuasion architecture. [EXPLICIT] Use this skill whenever the user needs to persuade decision-makers with data-driven narratives, even if they don't explicitly ask for "executive pitch". [EXPLICIT]
From jm-adknpx claudepluginhub javimontano/jm-adk-alfaThis skill is limited to using the following tools:
agents/guardian.mdagents/lead.mdagents/specialist.mdagents/support.mdevals/evals.jsonknowledge/body-of-knowledge.mdknowledge/knowledge-graph.mdprompts/meta.mdprompts/primary.mdprompts/variations/deep.mdprompts/variations/quick.mdreferences/domain-knowledge.mdtemplates/output.docx.mdtemplates/output.htmlGenerates C-level presentations with quantified problem statements, 4-pillar value propositions, 3-option comparison analysis, investment summaries with financial models (NPV, IRR, payback), and decision frameworks. Uses Problem-Agitate-Solve (PAS) persuasion architecture. [EXPLICIT]
Un pitch sin números es una opinión. Un pitch sin urgencia es un informe. El executive pitch transforma meses de análisis técnico en una narrativa de decisión que un C-level puede aprobar en 30 minutos. Cada slide, cada dato, cada visual tiene un solo propósito: que el decisor diga "sí" con confianza.
$1 — Decision-maker type: cfo, cto, ceo, board (default: ceo)$2 — Budget range indicator: under1m, 1m-5m, over5m (default: 1m-5m)Parse from $ARGUMENTS. Adapts emphasis based on audience. [EXPLICIT]
Parameters:
{MODO}: piloto-auto (default) | desatendido | supervisado | paso-a-paso
{FORMATO}: markdown (default) | html | dual{VARIANTE}: ejecutiva (~40% — S1 hero + S5 investment + S6 call to action) | técnica (full 7 sections, default)IF decision-maker is CFO:
-> Lead with financial case: NPV, IRR, payback, cost avoidance
-> Minimize technical detail; focus on financial metrics
IF decision-maker is CTO:
-> Lead with technical modernization and risk reduction
-> Include architecture summary; tech debt elimination path
IF decision-maker is CEO:
-> Lead with strategic alignment and competitive advantage
-> Market positioning, capability expansion, board-ready narrative
IF decision-maker is Board:
-> Lead with governance, fiduciary responsibility, risk-adjusted ROI
-> Include sensitivity analysis and worst-case scenarios
IF budget > $1M:
-> Add sensitivity analysis: +/-20% cost, +/-10% timeline variance
-> Include phased funding gates
IF budget > $5M:
-> Add board-level governance section
-> Quarterly re-calibration gates mandatory
-> Kill criteria explicit per phase
Every financial input must cite its source or state its assumption explicitly. [EXPLICIT]
Anchoring: Show worst-case first (inaction cost), then recommended option. Social proof: Industry benchmarks, peer company results. Urgency: Cost of delay quantified per month.
3-4 hero KPIs: Cost Savings, Timeline, ROI Payback, Risk Reduction. 150-word narrative: opportunity, urgency, recommendation. [EXPLICIT]
Business impact metrics table (current vs target vs gap vs annual impact). Pain points severity-rated (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM). Root cause analysis (technical, process, resource). Cost of inaction table (3-year projection). [EXPLICIT]
Four value cards: Cost Reduction, Revenue Acceleration, Risk Mitigation, Technical Modernization. Each with metric, mechanism, ROI timeline, Year 1 impact. Cumulative 3-year financial metrics (TCO, NPV, IRR, payback). [EXPLICIT]
Comparison matrix: Do Nothing vs Alternative vs Recommended. Dimensions: upfront cost, annual cost, 3-year TCO, payback, risk reduction, tech debt, scalability, compliance, velocity, implementation risk. Each option with pros/cons/outcome/financial impact. [EXPLICIT]
Timeline and team table. Budget breakdown card (services, infrastructure, contingency, monthly burn). Phased investment table with gates. [EXPLICIT]
What we ask for (approach, budget range, timeline, decision deadline). Approval checklist (CFO, CTO, business sponsor, steering). Next steps timeline (week-by-week post-approval). Cost of delay (monthly consequences). [EXPLICIT]
Risk table: probability, impact, mitigation, owner. Linked to findings from prior analysis phases. [EXPLICIT]
| Decision | Option A | Option B | When to Choose A | When to Choose B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 3-page executive summary | 15-page full business case | Time-constrained C-level; board pre-read | CFO deep-dive; formal procurement process |
| Projections | Aggressive (best-case) | Conservative (worst-case) | Competitive pitch; need to win mindshare | Risk-averse board; regulated industry |
| Tone | Push (prescriptive "do this") | Pull (consultative options) | Single decision-maker; clear mandate | Multiple stakeholders; consensus culture |
| Financial depth | Summary metrics (NPV, payback) | Full model (sensitivity, Monte Carlo) | CEO/CTO audience; budget < $1M | CFO/Board audience; budget > $5M |
06_Pitch_Ejecutivo_Deep.{md|html} — Executive pitch narrative (7-section or variante ejecutiva)06b_Business_Case_Deep.{md|html} — Detailed financial analysis with full sensitivity model{FORMATO} parameter; default is Markdown| Format | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
markdown | ✅ | Rich Markdown + Mermaid diagrams. Token-efficient. |
html | On demand | Branded HTML (Design System). Visual impact. |
dual | On demand | Both formats. |
Default output is Markdown with embedded Mermaid diagrams. HTML generation requires explicit {FORMATO}=html parameter. [EXPLICIT]
Author: Javier Montano | Last updated: March 18, 2026
Example invocations:
Searches, retrieves, and installs Agent Skills from prompts.chat registry using MCP tools like search_skills and get_skill. Activates for finding skills, browsing catalogs, or extending Claude.