Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From dh
Orchestrates parallel agent teams for coordinating 2+ workers, running SAM task waves, relaying discoveries between waves, handling blockers, and synthesizing results. Supports SAM structured and ad-hoc dispatch.
npx claudepluginhub jamie-bitflight/claude_skills --plugin development-harnessHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/dh:dispatchThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
The orchestrator's job is experience sharing and team health, not prompt engineering.
Dispatches persistent agent teams to execute tasks from a shared task list after cw-plan. Coordinates parallel execution with lead oversight using Teammate tools (requires experimental env vars).
Use when a task benefits from multiple Claude instances collaborating with peer-to-peer messaging - parallel research, multi-module features, cross-layer changes, or competing hypothesis debugging. Not for simple independent tasks (use parallel-execution) or sequential tasks (use delegated-execution).
Guides coordination of parallel agent teams (Implementer, Reviewer, Architect) for complex plans, cross-cutting concerns, and communicating work streams.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
The orchestrator's job is experience sharing and team health, not prompt engineering. Workers are specialists. Trust them. Relay what they learn. Unblock them when stuck. Synthesize what they produce.
For the delegation prompt template and pre-send verification, activate the /agent-orchestration:agent-orchestration skill.
flowchart TD
Start(["Work to dispatch"]) --> Q{"Is there a SAM task file<br>for this work?"}
Q -->|"Yes — SAM plan exists"| SAM["SAM Dispatch<br>Minimal prompt — task file has everything"]
Q -->|"No — ad-hoc work"| AdHoc["Ad-Hoc Dispatch<br>Use delegation template from<br>/agent-orchestration:agent-orchestration"]
SAM --> SAMPrompt["Agent prompt:<br>'You are working on P{N}/T{M}'<br>Agent loads task via sam_task (deprecated: sam_read) —<br>acceptance criteria, context, verification steps all there"]
AdHoc --> AdHocPrompt["Write OBSERVATIONS + DEFINITION OF SUCCESS +<br>CONTEXT per agent-orchestration template"]
SAMPrompt --> Team["TeamCreate and spawn workers"]
AdHocPrompt --> Team
TeamCreate(team_name="feature-slug-wave-1")
Name the team after the work and wave number. One team per parallel wave.
Fetch-once rule: Before spawning any workers, call backlog_view once per issue that will be worked in this session. Store each result in context keyed by issue number. Do NOT call backlog_view again for any issue already fetched — use the stored data for all wave iterations, prompt construction, and relay building. If a backlog_update changes an item's state mid-session, replace the cached value with a single new backlog_view call for that issue only.
Each worker gets exactly the context needed — no more.
SAM dispatch (task file is the delegation):
Agent(
team_name="feature-slug-wave-1",
name="T42-worker",
prompt="Your ROLE_TYPE is sub-agent. You are working on P500/T42."
)
The agent calls sam_task (deprecated: sam_read) to load the task. All acceptance criteria, verification steps, and context live in the task file.
Ad-hoc dispatch: follow the delegation template from /agent-orchestration:agent-orchestration — OBSERVATIONS, DEFINITION OF SUCCESS, CONTEXT.
Workers learn things during execution. Relay those discoveries to the next wave — this is experience sharing.
flowchart TD
Wave1(["Wave 1 workers complete"]) --> Collect["Collect discoveries:<br>- APIs that behaved unexpectedly<br>- Files that needed changes<br>- Constraints discovered during work<br>- Patterns found"]
Collect --> Q{"Are any discoveries<br>relevant to Wave 2 tasks?"}
Q -->|"Yes"| Inject["Inject as OBSERVATIONS into Wave 2 prompts<br>Label source: 'T42 worker reported: ...'"]
Q -->|"No"| Skip["Spawn Wave 2 with original task context"]
Inject --> Wave2(["Spawn Wave 2 workers"])
Skip --> Wave2
Workers report what they observed — relay facts, not interpretations, to the next wave.
When a worker sends a blocker message:
flowchart TD
Blocker(["Worker sends blocker"]) --> Classify{"What is blocking them?"}
Classify -->|"Missing information the orchestrator has"| Relay["SendMessage with the missing context<br>Worker resumes"]
Classify -->|"Conflict with another worker's changes"| Resolve["Read both workers' summaries<br>Decide which approach wins<br>SendMessage resolution to affected workers"]
Classify -->|"Scope question — out of task boundaries"| Bound["Confirm scope in task file via sam_task (deprecated: sam_read)<br>SendMessage: stay within T{M} boundaries or<br>create a new task for the discovered work"]
Classify -->|"Hard blocker — cannot proceed"| Escalate["SendMessage shutdown<br>Capture blocker as backlog item<br>Adjust wave plan"]
When all workers return:
File pointer pattern: instruct workers to write findings to ~/.dh/projects/{slug}/reports/ (resolved via dh_paths.reports_dir()) and return the path. Read reports, not inline summaries, to keep orchestrator context lean.
TeamDelete()
Shut workers down via SendMessage before deleting the team.
Dispatch when:
sam_plan — deprecated: sam_ready)Explore first, then dispatch when:
Micromanaging — "Use sed to edit line 42, then grep to verify." Workers are specialists. Describe what success looks like; let them determine how.
No discovery relay — Wave 2 workers miss context Wave 1 workers discovered. Always check if Wave 1 output changes what Wave 2 needs to know.
Ignoring blocker messages — Workers go idle waiting for a response. Check messages between waves.
Pre-gathering data — Running diagnostics before delegating wastes orchestrator context. Workers gather their own data.