money-retro

/money-retro — Weekly Business Retrospective

Standard startup: before producing output, run the 4-step startup sequence per /money § Standard Skill Startup (resolve slug → telemetry write → /money-retro reads from telemetry rather than auto-loading learnings, since it's analyzing usage patterns themselves).

Your job is to read the week's accumulated state from disk and produce a sharp, evidence-based retrospective. This is not a pep talk. It surfaces what actually happened, what stalled, and what should change for the coming week.

The retro is informed entirely by what's on disk — sessions, learnings, skill-usage telemetry, and any revenue data the user provides. Do not improvise narrative beyond what the evidence supports.

---

Triggers

Command	Behavior
/money-retro	Retro for the past 7 days, current project
/money-retro --days N	Custom window (e.g., --days 30 for monthly)
/money-retro --slug <project>	Retro for a different project
/money-retro --portfolio	Aggregate retro across ALL projects in ~/.smtm/sessions/

Natural-language equivalents:

• "Weekly retro", "Business retro", "What did we ship", "How's the week going"
• "周复盘", "业务回顾", "本周怎么样"

---

What to load

For the time window (default 7 days, sliding from now):

1. Snapshots at ~/.smtm/sessions/{slug}/ — filter by filename timestamp ≥ window start
2. Learnings added at ~/.smtm/projects/{slug}/learnings.jsonl — filter by captured_at ≥ window start
3. Skill-usage telemetry at ~/.smtm/analytics/skill-usage.jsonl — filter by ts ≥ window start, group by skill
4. Optional: revenue data — if user provides numbers (e.g., "MRR went from $X to $Y"), incorporate. Otherwise omit revenue section.
5. Prior retros at ~/.smtm/projects/{slug}/retros/ — for trend comparison

If the window is empty (no snapshots, no learnings, no skill usage), say so plainly:

No activity recorded in {project} for the past {N} days. Either you weren't running money-* skills with ~/.smtm/ enabled, or this project was dormant. Either is fine — but there's nothing to retro.

---

Workflow

Step 1 — Aggregate the week

For the time window, compute:

• Snapshots in window: count, with each snapshot's title and status
• Decisions made: pull from each snapshot's Confirmed conclusions section
• Things ruled out: pull from each snapshot's Ruled out section
• Open hypotheses: pull from each snapshot's Open hypotheses section
• Stalled hypotheses: open hypotheses from snapshots ≥14 days old without a follow-up snapshot
• Learnings added: count + categories
• Skills used: histogram, sorted by frequency

Step 2 — Identify "stalled" items

A hypothesis is "stalled" if:

• It was opened in a snapshot ≥14 days ago
• No subsequent snapshot in the same project has either confirmed it or ruled it out
• No learning has been added that addresses it

These are the highest-value findings — usually founders forget about hypotheses they meant to test.

Step 3 — Find unused skills

From skill-usage.jsonl, list skills the user has NEVER run for this project, OR has run but not in the past 30 days. These are activation candidates.

Don't preach about every unused skill — pick the 1-2 most relevant given the current project state. If they have a shipped product but never run /money-ads, that's a candidate. If they have no product yet, /money-ads is correctly unused; don't surface it.

Step 4 — Output

# Weekly Business Retro — {project}

**Window**: {start date} → {end date} ({N} days)
**Generated**: {now}

---

## What you decided this week

{For each snapshot's "Confirmed conclusions" — list with snapshot title and date.}

If no snapshots: "No new decisions checkpointed. Either nothing was decided, or `/money-save` wasn't run."

---

## What you ruled out

{Aggregated from snapshots' "Ruled out" sections, deduplicated.}

If empty: "Nothing was explicitly ruled out this week."

---

## Stalled hypotheses (action required)

These hypotheses were opened ≥14 days ago and never tested:

| Opened | Days stalled | Hypothesis | From |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-15 | 18 | Reddit r/SaaS will convert at >2% | snapshot:wedge-locked |
| ... | | | |

For each stalled item, suggest the cheapest test to resolve it.

If empty: "All open hypotheses are <14 days old. No stalls."

---

## Learnings captured

{Show recent learnings added in the window, with category and confidence.}

If empty: "No new learnings captured. If you observed any patterns this week, run `/money-learn add`."

---

## Skill activity

| Skill | Runs this week | Trend vs prior week |
|---|---|---|
| /money-discover | 3 | ↑ (was 1) |
| /money-content | 8 | → (was 7) |
| /money-ads | 0 | — (never run) |
| ... | | |

---

## Activation candidates (skills you haven't used)

Pick 1-2 high-relevance unused skills. Frame as a question:

> 💡 You've shipped the product and run `/money-content` 8 times — but never `/money-ads`. With your current MRR trajectory, paid ads might be the next leverage point. Want me to walk you through `/money-ads` next session?

---

## Revenue (only if user provided)

Show MRR/revenue if the user shared numbers. Otherwise omit.

---

## Recommended focus for next week

ONE thing. Not three. The single highest-leverage move based on what the retro surfaced.

Format: "**Focus**: {one sentence}. **First action**: {today or tomorrow specific step}."

---

## Snapshot of project state

| | |
|---|---|
| Total snapshots in project | {N} |
| Total learnings | {N} ({validated} validated, {emerging} emerging, {hypothesis} hypothesis) |
| Project age | {months since first snapshot} |
| Open hypotheses | {N} |

Step 5 — Save the retro

Write the retro itself to ~/.smtm/projects/{slug}/retros/{YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS}-retro.md. Each retro is a new file (never overwrite). This builds a longitudinal record of how the project is moving.

Confirm to the user:

✅ Retro saved to ~/.smtm/projects/{slug}/retros/{filename}.md Compare to last week's retro: ~/.smtm/projects/{slug}/retros/{prior filename}.md

---

Portfolio mode (--portfolio)

If invoked with --portfolio, aggregate across ALL projects in ~/.smtm/sessions/. Output is similar but adds a top-level "Project rollup" table:

Project	Snapshots this week	New learnings	Stalled	Status (most recent snapshot)
musicapi	3	2	0	in-progress
kolfind	0	0	4	⚠️ stalled
ccapi	1	0	1	in-progress

The "stalled" surface here is especially valuable — solo founders often have one product that's silently dying while they pour attention into the noisier one.

---

Principles

• Evidence-only narrative — If it's not in a snapshot, learning, or telemetry log, it's not in the retro. No improvised storytelling.
• Stalled hypotheses are the highest-leverage finding — Most founders will skim the activity section but stop cold at "you never tested this thing you planned to test 3 weeks ago."
• One focus, not five — Recommendations dilute as they multiply. Pick the single highest-leverage move.
• Trend over snapshot — Show comparison to prior weeks where possible. Trend reveals what point-in-time can hide.
• Don't moralize unused skills — Surface 1-2 high-relevance ones, but don't shame the user for not running everything.

---

After the retro

Always recommend one of:

• /money-learn add if the retro surfaced an obvious pattern that wasn't yet logged
• /money-save after acting on the recommended focus
• /money-panel if multiple stalled hypotheses suggest the plan itself needs re-review
• /money-diagnose if stalled items are stalled because of an execution blocker, not lack of time

---

Value Quantification (Required at End of Output)

⏱ Time saved	~1-2 hours of digging through old chats, snapshots, and trying to remember what you decided
⚠️ Risks avoided	(1) Stalled hypotheses going untested for months; (2) running the same activity (e.g., /money-content 12x) without checking ROI; (3) ignoring a quietly-dying side project while focusing on the noisy one; (4) repeating the same week-over-week without intentional course correction
✅ What you got	Decisions / ruled-out / stalled / learnings / skill activity, plus ONE recommended focus and a portfolio rollup if multi-project
🚧 Without this skill	You'd reach the end of the quarter unable to articulate what changed, and at least one hypothesis would have silently aged out without ever being tested