social-media-footprint

Map the public social media footprint for $ARGUMENTS.

[!IMPORTANT] For people (not organisations): this skill requires the investigator agent's full authorisation gate before invocation.

Step 1: Platform search

Search for the subject on each platform. For organisations, look for official accounts. For individuals, look for public profiles.

Platform	Search method
LinkedIn	Name search; for organisations, company page search
Twitter/X	twitter.com/search?q=[name] or name search
Facebook	Name/page search — public content only
Instagram	Username search — public accounts only
TikTok	Username search
YouTube	Channel search
GitHub	Username or organisation search
Reddit	Username search (for individuals who post publicly under their name)

Record: account URL, handle, follower/subscriber count, account creation date if visible, posting cadence (active / occasional / dormant).

Step 2: Username patterns

Once a username is found on one platform, search the same username across others.

Tools: Namechk (public availability search), manual search on major platforms.

Consistent usernames across platforms are a strong identity signal. Inconsistent ones may indicate separate accounts for different contexts (professional vs personal).

Step 3: Content assessment

For each active account, review public posts to establish:

• Primary topics and themes
• Tone and audience (professional, community, personal expression)
• Posting frequency and recency
• Notable public statements or positions
• Engagement patterns (comments, shares, replies from others)

Scope: public content only. Do not attempt to view locked, private, or friends-gated content by any means.

Step 4: Organisational accounts (organisations only)

For organisation investigations, map:

• Official verified accounts vs unofficial fan/community pages
• Employee accounts that post about work publicly
• Executive accounts (often the most informative signal of direction and culture)
• Product-specific sub-accounts

Rules

• Public content only. No access to locked, private, or friends-gated content — this is a hard limit with no exceptions.
• Don't screen-scrape, don't attempt to infer private content, don't attempt to bypass platform access controls.
• For individuals: scope to public professional presence unless the gate record explicitly expands to personal accounts.
• Content assessment produces observations, not character conclusions. "Posts frequently about [topic]" is an observation. "This person is [character judgement]" is not your call.
• A well-curated, private social presence is a finding. It means the subject is intentional about their public footprint.

Output format

### Social media footprint: [Name]

**Gate record (if individual):** [link or copy]
**Date:** [today]

#### Accounts found

| Platform | Account/URL | Followers | Cadence | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|

#### Username pattern

[Consistent handle across platforms — or variation noted]

#### Content themes

[Per active platform: primary topics, tone, notable content — public only]

#### Organisational accounts (if applicable)

[Official vs unofficial, executive accounts, product accounts]

#### Accounts not found

[Platforms searched with no results — absence noted as finding]

#### Observations

[Patterns, gaps, anomalies worth noting]