Skill

flow-impl-review

Coordinates implementation reviews of current branch changes via rp-cli, gathering git diff/commit/plan context for RepoPrompt chat delegation. Use for PRs or code reviews.

Git

code-quality

Install

npx claudepluginhub gmickel/flow-next --plugin flow

Tool Access

This skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.

Preview

Conduct a John Carmack-level review of implementation changes on the current branch using RepoPrompt's context builder and chat.

Supporting Assets

rp-cli-reference.mdworkflow.md

SKILL.md

Similar Skills

using-git-worktrees

Creates isolated Git worktrees for feature branches with prioritized directory selection, gitignore safety checks, auto project setup for Node/Python/Rust/Go, and baseline verification.

superpowers

158.9k

subagent-driven-development

3 files

Executes implementation plans in current session by dispatching fresh subagents per independent task, with two-stage reviews: spec compliance then code quality.

superpowers

158.9k

dispatching-parallel-agents

Dispatches parallel agents to independently tackle 2+ tasks like separate test failures or subsystems without shared state or dependencies.

superpowers

158.9k

Stats

Parent Repo Stars562

Parent Repo Forks40

Last CommitJan 2, 2026

Actions

View Source View Plugin View on GitHub View README

Implementation Review Mode (CLI)

Conduct a John Carmack-level review of implementation changes on the current branch using RepoPrompt's context builder and chat.

Role: Code Review Coordinator (NOT the reviewer) Tool: rp-cli for context building and chat delegation

Input

Arguments: #$ARGUMENTS Format: [additional context, focus areas, or special instructions]

Example: /flow:impl-review focus on the auth changes, ignore styling

Reviews all changes on the current branch vs main/master.

FIRST: Determine Review Mode

Check: which rp-cli >/dev/null 2>&1 If NOT available: inform user rp-cli is required for this skill.

If review mode was already chosen earlier in this conversation (e.g., user answered "2a" or "2b" during /flow:plan or /flow:work setup): → Use that mode, don't ask again.

If invoked directly without prior context, ask:

Both modes use RepoPrompt for context building (builder, file selection, codemaps).
The difference is where the review happens:

Review mode:
a) RepoPrompt chat (default) — review via rp-cli chat
b) Export for external LLM — export context file for ChatGPT, Claude web, etc.

(Reply: "a", "b", "export", or just tell me)

Wait for response. Parse naturally.

Context Sources

The workflow gathers context from:

Git diff and commit messages
Plan files referenced in commits
PRD/architecture docs
Beads: If you know which issue(s) this work relates to, include via bd show

Critical Requirement

DO NOT REVIEW CODE YOURSELF – you are a coordinator, not the reviewer.

Your job is to:

Use rp-cli -e 'windows' to find the RepoPrompt window
Use rp-cli -w <id> -e 'builder ...' to build context
Use rp-cli -w <id> -e 'chat ...' to execute the review

The RepoPrompt chat conducts the actual review with full file context.

Workflow

Read workflow.md and follow each phase in order. Phases include change identification, context building, and review execution.

rp-cli Reference

Read rp-cli-reference.md for command syntax and examples.