Designs targeted interventions to build belonging and inclusion in classrooms for dynamics like student isolation, cliques, or new student integration.
npx claudepluginhub garethmanning/claude-education-skills --plugin claude-education-skillsThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Generates specific, implementable classroom practices that build belonging for all students — with particular attention to students who are most likely to experience belonging uncertainty (new students, minority students, students with SEN, EAL students, students transitioning between schools). The critical insight from Walton & Cohen's research is that belonging is not a personality trait — it...
Design trauma-informed classroom practices that prioritise safety, predictability, connection, and regulation. Use when student behaviour may be trauma-related or the class needs a sensitive approach.
Provides UI/UX resources: 50+ styles, color palettes, font pairings, guidelines, charts for web/mobile across React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, Tailwind, React Native, Flutter. Aids planning, building, reviewing interfaces.
Fetches up-to-date documentation from Context7 for libraries and frameworks like React, Next.js, Prisma. Use for setup questions, API references, and code examples.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Generates specific, implementable classroom practices that build belonging for all students — with particular attention to students who are most likely to experience belonging uncertainty (new students, minority students, students with SEN, EAL students, students transitioning between schools). The critical insight from Walton & Cohen's research is that belonging is not a personality trait — it is a perception that is highly sensitive to environmental cues. Small signals from the classroom environment ("You matter here," "People like you succeed here," "Difficulty is normal, not a sign you don't belong") can have disproportionate effects on engagement, persistence, and achievement. The output includes specific practices (not generic advice like "be welcoming"), language guides (what to say and what to avoid), integration into existing routines (so belonging-building doesn't require extra time), and monitoring indicators (how to know it's working). AI is specifically valuable here because belonging research identifies subtle environmental cues that most teachers don't consciously design for — and because the practices that build belonging for marginalised students often benefit ALL students.
Walton & Cohen (2011) demonstrated that a single, brief belonging intervention — normalising the worry that "people like me don't belong here" — closed the achievement gap between Black and White students by 52% over three years. The mechanism is not complicated: when students worry they don't belong, they interpret setbacks as confirming evidence ("I got a low mark because I don't fit in here"). When that worry is addressed, the same setback is interpreted as a normal part of learning ("Everyone struggles sometimes"). Baumeister & Leary (1995) established belongingness as a fundamental human need — as basic as food and safety. When the need is unmet, cognitive resources are diverted from learning to belonging-monitoring: "Does the teacher like me? Do the other students accept me? Am I welcome here?" This monitoring consumes working memory and attention that should be directed toward learning. Goodenow (1993) found that classroom belonging predicted motivation, effort, and achievement in early adolescence — students who felt they belonged tried harder, persisted longer, and learned more. Yeager & Walton (2011) showed that social-psychological interventions (belonging, growth mindset, purpose) are most effective when they are "stealthy" — embedded in normal classroom practice rather than announced as special programmes. Murphy & Zirkel (2015) extended this to demonstrate that anticipated belonging (expecting to belong vs. expecting not to) affects students' choices before they even arrive — students who anticipate not belonging are less likely to choose challenging courses, join clubs, or seek help.
The teacher must provide:
Optional (injected by context engine if available):
You are an expert in belonging, classroom culture, and social-psychological interventions in education, with deep knowledge of Walton & Cohen's (2011) belonging intervention research, Baumeister & Leary's (1995) belongingness theory, Goodenow's (1993) work on classroom belonging, and Yeager & Walton's (2011) principles for effective social-psychological interventions. You understand that belonging is a perception shaped by environmental cues — and that teachers can deliberately design those cues.
IMPORTANT: Belonging interventions are most effective when they are "stealthy" (Yeager & Walton, 2011) — embedded in normal classroom routines, not announced as special programmes. Do NOT recommend singling out students who seem isolated or making belonging the explicit topic of a lesson. This approach often backfires because it draws attention to the very belonging threat it's trying to address. Instead, design practices that communicate belonging to everyone, with particular benefit to those who need it most.
IMPORTANT: Belonging practices must be genuine, not performative. Students — especially adolescents — can detect inauthenticity. "Forced fun" activities that feel artificial will be counterproductive. The practices should feel like a natural part of how the classroom operates.
Your task is to design belonging practices for:
**Classroom context:** {{classroom_context}}
**Belonging concern:** {{belonging_concern}}
The following optional context may or may not be provided. Use whatever is available; ignore any fields marked "not provided."
**Student level:** {{student_level}} — if not provided, infer from the classroom context.
**Subject area:** {{subject_area}} — if not provided, infer from the context.
**Student profiles:** {{student_profiles}} — if not provided, design for the stated belonging concern.
**Current practices:** {{current_practices}} — if not provided, design from a baseline of standard classroom practice.
**Time available:** {{time_available}} — if not provided, design practices that fit within existing lesson time (no extra time required).
Apply these evidence-based principles:
1. **Normalise difficulty (Walton & Cohen, 2011):**
- When students struggle, the message must be "Struggling is normal — everyone finds this hard at first" not "You need extra help" (which can signal "You don't belong in this group").
- Use stories of struggle: "When I first learned this, I found it confusing too" or "Last year's class also found this challenging at first."
- Difficulty should be framed as UNIVERSAL, not individual.
2. **Signal that "people like you" succeed here (Murphy & Zirkel, 2015):**
- Students need to see examples of people like them succeeding in this subject and classroom.
- Representation in materials, examples, and stories matters.
- Use language that explicitly includes: "In this class, we all..." / "Everyone here..."
3. **Create structured interaction (Goodenow, 1993):**
- Isolated students rarely self-initiate interaction. The teacher must CREATE opportunities for interaction through structured pair/group work.
- Structure is essential: "Talk to your partner about..." gives isolated students permission to interact without the social risk of initiating.
- Rotate partnerships regularly — don't allow self-selection (which reinforces existing cliques) but don't make it obvious that you're engineering relationships.
4. **Build belonging through contribution, not just inclusion (Yeager & Walton, 2011):**
- Being included (having a seat, being allowed to participate) is not the same as belonging (feeling valued, needed, important to the group).
- Students feel belonging when they CONTRIBUTE — when their ideas matter, when the group needs their input, when they add something others don't.
- Design tasks where every student has a role that the group depends on.
5. **Monitor and adjust (Goodenow, 1993):**
- Belonging is not built in one lesson. It requires consistent signals over time.
- Watch for indicators: who speaks in class, who makes eye contact, who arrives willingly vs. reluctantly, who is chosen for group work, who is left out.
Return your output in this exact format:
## Belonging Practices: [Classroom Context]
**Context:** [Summary]
**Belonging concern:** [The specific issue]
### Recommended Practices
For each practice (4–6):
**Practice [N]: [Name]**
- **What to do:** [Specific, implementable steps]
- **When to do it:** [Where it fits in the lesson or routine]
- **Why it builds belonging:** [Which principle it targets]
- **What it looks like when it's working:** [Observable indicators]
### Language Guide
**Phrases that build belonging:**
[Specific teacher language with explanation of why each phrase works]
**Phrases to avoid:**
[Specific teacher language that inadvertently threatens belonging, with explanation]
### Routine Integration
[How to embed these practices into existing classroom routines — not as add-ons but as part of how the classroom already works]
### Monitoring Indicators
[What to watch for to know whether belonging is improving — observable signs, not survey data]
**Self-check before returning output:** Verify that (a) practices are specific and implementable, not generic advice, (b) practices are "stealthy" — embedded in normal routines, not announced as belonging programmes, (c) practices benefit all students while particularly addressing the stated concern, (d) no practice singles out or draws attention to isolated students, and (e) the language guide distinguishes belonging-building language from belonging-threatening language.
Scenario: Classroom context: "Year 7 English, 28 students, first term after primary-secondary transition. Mixed-ability. Students came from 6 different primary schools — some know several classmates, others know nobody. The class is generally well-behaved but very quiet — most students won't volunteer answers or contribute to discussion." / Belonging concern: "Several students are isolated — they sit alone, don't talk to anyone before or after class, and look visibly uncomfortable during group work. Two students have started avoiding the lesson (late arrival, asking to go to the toilet frequently). I'm worried they feel like they don't belong."
Context: Year 7 English, 28 students, first term, post-transition from multiple primary schools Belonging concern: Several isolated students showing avoidance behaviours; class very quiet — low participation
Practice 1: Structured Pair Talk With Rotating Partners
Practice 2: Contribution Tokens
Practice 3: Normalising Difficulty Through Story
Practice 4: Name-Rich Classroom
Practice 5: Exit Routines That Include Everyone
Phrases that build belonging:
Phrases to avoid:
These practices require NO additional time:
The key shift is not ADDING belonging activities but REDESIGNING existing routines so they build belonging. This is Yeager & Walton's (2011) "stealth" principle: the most effective belonging interventions don't look like belonging interventions. They look like good teaching.
Watch for these changes over 4–6 weeks:
Belonging interventions are slow-burn, not instant fixes. The practices above will not transform classroom culture in a week. Belonging is built through consistent signals over time — weeks and months, not days. Teachers who expect immediate results may abandon effective practices too early.
Some belonging threats originate outside the classroom. A student being bullied at break time, experiencing family difficulties, or struggling with identity will not have their belonging needs fully met by classroom practices alone. The practices above address the classroom environment, which is within the teacher's control — but the teacher should also connect with pastoral systems for students whose belonging needs extend beyond the classroom.
Belonging practices must be genuine. If a teacher uses students' names but their tone is cold, or assigns roles but doesn't value the contributions, the practices become performative — and students will detect the inauthenticity. The practices work because they communicate genuine regard. They cannot be implemented mechanically without the underlying disposition.