From xlfg-engineering
Internal xlfg phase skill. Use only during /xlfg runs to run proportional multi-lens review and capture only net-new findings or residual risk.
npx claudepluginhub flrngel/xlfg --plugin xlfg-engineeringThis skill is limited to using the following tools:
Use only during `/xlfg` orchestration.
Runs parallel reviews from 6 reviewers (security, UX/DX, external Codex/Gemini CLIs, domain experts) on code, plans, or requirements for quality gates. Invoke via /review --mode code/plan/clarify.
Verifies phase builds match plans with automated checks against must-haves and interactive UAT walkthroughs. For PBR workflows; supports --auto-fix, --teams, model overrides.
Mandates invoking relevant skills via tools before any response in coding sessions. Covers access, priorities, and adaptations for Claude Code, Copilot CLI, Gemini CLI.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Use only during /xlfg orchestration.
Input: $ARGUMENTS (RUN_ID or latest)
Run proportional review after verification, not cleanup theater before it.
RUN_ID, DOCS_RUN_DIR, and DX_RUN_DIR.spec.mdverification.mdworkboard.mdrisk.md, review-summary.md, proof-map.mddocs/xlfg/knowledge/current-state.mdxlfg-architecture-reviewerxlfg-security-reviewerxlfg-performance-reviewerxlfg-ux-reviewerarchitecture-R1.md, architecture-R2.md) so each reviewer still gets one clear input and one clear output.DOCS_RUN_DIR/reviews/ before the conductor synthesizes review-summary.md. If a reviewer returns only a chat summary or setup note, use SendMessage with the returned agent ID to resume the same reviewer once instead of accepting the lane. If no agent ID is available, re-dispatch the exact same packet once.review-summary.md from the reviewer artifacts. Do not treat an empty or missing reviewer artifact as a clean review.review-summary.md only when there are real findings or non-trivial residual risks.spec.md and workboard.md with must-fix findings or accepted residual risk.PRIMARY_ARTIFACT with Status: IN_PROGRESS, the scoped mission, and a short checklist so the specialist is resuming a concrete work item instead of starting from an empty chat turn.PRIMARY_ARTIFACT: <exact path>
FILE_SCOPE: <bounded files or paths>
DONE_CHECK: <single honest check or NONE>
RETURN_CONTRACT: DONE|BLOCKED|FAILED <artifact-path> only
CONTEXT_DIGEST block in each review packet that embeds:
spec.mdverification.mdLS or Glob instead of Read on directories; use Grep plus chunked Read windows instead of loading an oversized file in one shot.