From brainstorm
Read the project and suggest the 5 most valuable features or improvements the developer could build next. Use when the user asks "what should I build next?", "brainstorm ideas for this project", "what features are missing?", "how can I improve this?", "what's worth adding?", "give me ideas", or anything about deciding what to work on next. Also use when the user seems stuck or is asking for direction on their project. TRIGGER this skill whenever the user asks for ideas, suggestions, or "what next" guidance about their own codebase — even if they don't say "brainstorm" explicitly.
npx claudepluginhub dan323/easier-life-skills --plugin brainstormThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Read the project, then produce five specific, high-value ideas ranked by impact.
Verifies tests pass on completed feature branch, presents options to merge locally, create GitHub PR, keep as-is or discard; executes choice and cleans up worktree.
Guides root cause investigation for bugs, test failures, unexpected behavior, performance issues, and build failures before proposing fixes.
Writes implementation plans from specs for multi-step tasks, mapping files and breaking into TDD bite-sized steps before coding.
Read the project, then produce five specific, high-value ideas ranked by impact. The goal is to surface ideas the developer couldn't easily generate themselves — insights that come from reading the whole codebase at once and thinking hard about what it could become, not just what it's missing.
This skill is read-only. It produces a report. It does not modify any file.
cat README.md 2>/dev/null || cat readme.md 2>/dev/null || true
ls -la
cat package.json 2>/dev/null || cat pyproject.toml 2>/dev/null || \
cat Cargo.toml 2>/dev/null || cat go.mod 2>/dev/null || \
cat pom.xml 2>/dev/null || cat build.gradle 2>/dev/null || \
cat build.gradle.kts 2>/dev/null || true
git log --oneline -20 2>/dev/null || true
Read the actual code — the core logic, main entry points, and anything that stands out. You're looking for what the project does, how it does it, and what it leaves undone.
git ls-files 2>/dev/null || find . -type f \
! -path '*/.git/*' ! -path '*/node_modules/*' ! -path '*/__pycache__/*' \
! -path '*/dist/*' ! -path '*/build/*' | head -60
grep -rn "TODO\|FIXME\|HACK\|XXX" \
--include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.py" --include="*.go" \
--include="*.rs" --include="*.java" --include="*.kt" --include="*.md" \
. 2>/dev/null | grep -v "node_modules\|\.git\|dist\|build" | head -30
Work through three separate lenses, then combine and rank:
Technical lens — what's broken or inefficient?
Product lens — what would make this more valuable?
Imagination lens — what would surprise the developer?
The Feature / Improvement distinction matters:
Aim for at least 2 genuine Features (capabilities not hinted at anywhere in the code) and 2–3 Improvements. A pure list of fixes or TODO-completions is not a useful brainstorm — the developer can find those themselves.
Rank by value/effort ratio: a quick win with high impact beats a technically impressive idea that would take months.
## Brainstorm: 5 Ideas for {project name}
{One sentence describing what the project is, for context.}
---
### 1. {Title} · {Effort: hours / days / weeks} · {Type: Feature / Improvement}
**What**: {One or two sentences. Specific, not generic — not "add error handling" but
"replace Optional.get() in BookService with orElseThrow so unknown IDs return
404 instead of a Java stack trace."}
**Why it matters**: {Concrete impact — for Features: who benefits and what becomes
possible; for Improvements: what breaks or degrades today and
what gets better.}
**Where to start**: {The specific file, function, or class to touch first. One
actionable first step grounded in the actual codebase.}
---
### 2. ...
(repeat for all 5)
---
### Honourable mentions
{2–3 additional ideas in a single sentence each, if there were more worth noting.
Omit this section if nothing else stands out.}
Keep ideas specific to this project. Generic advice ("add CI", "write more tests", "improve documentation") should only appear if there is a concrete, project-specific reason it belongs in the top 5.