ollama-coder

Ollama Coder - When to Use It

The rule is simple: Only use Ollama when the OUTPUT will be significantly longer than your prompt.

Writing a prompt to Ollama costs Claude tokens. If you can just write the code yourself in fewer tokens than the prompt would take, do it yourself.

Token Economics

Task	Prompt Length	Output Length	Use Ollama?
"Write isPrime function"	~5 tokens	~50 tokens	✅ Yes
"Write a Dockerfile with multi-stage build"	~10 tokens	~200 tokens	✅ Yes
"Write rate limiter class with semaphore"	~15 tokens	~300 tokens	✅ Yes
"Reverse a string"	~5 tokens	~10 tokens	❌ No, just write s[::-1]
"Add 1 to x"	~5 tokens	~5 tokens	❌ No, just write x + 1
"Fix this typo in line 5"	~20 tokens	~10 tokens	❌ No, just fix it

Use Ollama For

Boilerplate-heavy tasks (high output:input ratio):

• Dockerfiles, CI configs, package.json
• TypeScript interfaces/types from descriptions
• SQL queries from natural language
• Test file scaffolding
• API endpoint handlers
• Class implementations from specs

Tasks where model knows patterns you'd have to look up:

• Regex patterns
• Bash find/xargs/awk combinations
• Framework-specific boilerplate
• Algorithm implementations

Do NOT Use Ollama For

Quick fixes (low output:input ratio):

• One-line changes
• Variable renames
• Import additions
• Simple math/logic

Context-dependent tasks:

• Anything requiring knowledge of your codebase
• Multi-file refactors
• Bug fixes that need to understand surrounding code

High-stakes code:

• Security-sensitive logic
• Complex async/concurrency
• Anything you can't quickly verify

Quick Reference

http://192.168.1.79:11434/api/generate

curl -s http://192.168.1.79:11434/api/generate \
  -d '{"model": "qwen2.5-coder:14b", "prompt": "YOUR_PROMPT. Code only.", "stream": false}' \
  | jq -r '.response'

Tip: Add "Code only." to prompts to reduce verbose explanations.

What It's Good At (tested)

Task Type	Quality
Single functions	✅ Excellent
Algorithms	✅ Excellent
Regex	✅ Excellent
SQL queries	✅ Excellent
TypeScript types	✅ Excellent
Dockerfiles	✅ Good
Bash one-liners	✅ Good
Code explanation	✅ Good
API design	✅ Good
Bug fixes (simple)	✅ Good
Complex async	⚠️ Can have bugs
Multi-step reasoning	⚠️ Inconsistent